Anarchic update news all over the world - 4.01.2018

Today's Topics:

   

1.  [Spain] "Free Women": the anarchists who revolutionized the
      working class By ANA (pt) [machine translation] 

     (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
   

2.  Libertario Paraná: COMMUNIQUÉ about THE REPORT TITLED
      "RAM" - TERRORIST IS THE STATE (ca) [machine translation]
      (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
   

3.  Book Review From Rebel Worker*: Left of the Left: My
      Memories of Sam Dolgoff By Anatole Dolgoff (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
   

4.  France, Alternative Libertaire AL Décembre -
      CGT-Metallurgy: Towards a syndicalism of expertise ? (fr, it, pt)
      [machine translation] (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
   

5.  France, Alternative Libertaire AL Décembre - A book on
      contemporary fascism: "Dark Times" (fr, it, pt) [machine
      translation] (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
   

6.  France, Alternative Libertaire AL - logbook, A libertarian
      communist in YPG # 16: " I draw my bow, the fight goes on ! "
      (fr, it, pt) [machine translation] (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
   

7.  anarkismo.net: Where is the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK)
      heading? by Zaher Baher (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
   

8.  Britain, freedom news: Solidarity with prisoners on New
      Year's Eve (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1





At the end of the Second Republic some 21,000 anarchists grouped together to form the 
first radical feminist movement of authentic popular base in Spain. One of the precursor 
groups of claims for the liberation of gender that, so many years later, continue present 
in the present time. ---- By Beatriz Asuar Gallego ---- It is said that the story is 
written by the winners, but what is not said is that the winners, almost in their 
entirety, are men. And it is not even said that they often forget women: if we look back 
and think of the great moments of humanity's change, or of the great revolutions, no or 
almost no woman's name comes to mind. ---- The history of Spain was no less harsh with 
women, burying for many years the role they played during the country's most rebellious 
era, the Civil War. However, social organizations constantly try to fill a gap in our 
collective memory, and face forgetting. As an example, the CGT and Anarchist Women with 
the Association of "Free Women", which in this 2017 makes 80 years of its foundation. An 
organization that was then formed as the first radical feminist movement of authentic 
popular base and precursor in the struggle for claims that, so many years later, still 
present today.

How were they born? At the end of the Second Republic in a political and cultural dynamic 
that opened new possibilities for the participation of women in the social struggle. The 
CNT, National Confederation of Labor, was since 1910 the main trade union center guided by 
anarchism, from which the CGT was later derived. A union that had a large presence of 
women and recognized basic labor rights as economic freedom or equal pay, but which almost 
did not think of initiatives of specific struggles.

At this, women needed to make their own way. In Barcelona, the main nucleus of the 
anarchist movement, was founded in 1934 the Women's Cultural Group, a pioneer in the 
articulations of women within the union. But the outbreak of civil war changed the pace of 
the formations, advanced and decided to create their own organization. On May 2, 1936, 
several women published the first issue of the magazine "Mujeres Libres", which, as 
reported by Paula Ruíz Roa, responsible for the CGT Women's Secretariat "served as a basis 
for the constitution of the libertarian group and the organization of its first and the 
only congress, which they could hold in August 1937. " In a short time, there were 147 
local groups and 21,000 affiliated women.

The first autonomous group of women

Since its inception, "Mujeres Libres" has formed as a totally autonomous group. Most of 
them militants, were already part of other organizations of the libertarian movement - 
CNT, FAI, Libertadores Youth -, however, did not subordinate to any of the previous 
structures.

This was a battle of the anarchists for the rejection that generated within the 
libertarian movement a women-only organization: "It was they who showed that it was 
necessary to separate organizations of the entire working class from women's organizations 
to differentiate the claims of both, because within of the struggle of the working class 
was not given the importance they had, "explains the current secretary of the CGT, José 
Manuel Muñoz Póliz.

American writer and historian Martha Ackelsberg points out that the organization's 
greatest achievement was to be the "pioneer among feminist organizations" and to "unite 
the struggle against capitalist exploitation with patriarchal oppression." Thus, "Free 
Women" followed the ideological line of the CNT, but developed its own objective: to 
emancipate the woman from the triple slavery, "slavery of ignorance, woman slavery and 
production slavery." With the beginning of the war, they proposed another goal, "to 
collaborate with an orderly and efficient aid in the defense of the Republic".

Claims still present today

"What strikes the most in this group is how they put the problem of women. Especially at 
that time, with themes that range from the abolition of prostitution to mixed education, 
popular canteens or day care, or free love. Claims that reach the majority of the left 
much later, in the 70's, "says the Brazilian historian Thiago Lemos Silva, who studied for 
more than ten years the history of this grouping.

 From the outset, they claimed the importance of incorporating women into paid work, 
performing multiple jobs, as well as back-up activities: from literacy to job training in 
all sectors of work. And, so that this incorporation was not a double burden for women, 
they complained - as well as now - and started popular eaters and day care centers in the 
workplace.

They broke away from the idea that home and conjugal relationships were private: they 
fervently denounced control within married life from the state and the Catholic Church. 
They proclaimed free love and denounced that the traditional model of family fosters 
inequality. On the one hand, because they maintain the economic dependencies on which the 
patriarchy stands. On the other, because it supports the submission of women to men within 
the family for which they had no right to express themselves in it.

Another of the themes that most stood out was child education. They ensured that in 
schools a mentality framed by bourgeois values was acquired, so it was essential that 
education should be a total turning point in the development of a school for freedom. 
Within education, moreover, they called for the need for sex education, addressing topics 
that had hitherto been taboo, such as contraceptive methods or abortion.

The repression against the anarchists

As with almost all revolutionary groups the repression during the war by the Francoist 
troops were colossal. But with the groups of women like this who assumed a double danger 
in fighting not only for the emancipation of the working class, but also for the 
emancipation of the woman.

It seems impossible to document the exact number of women who have gone through the ordeal 
of torture, murder, disappearances and sexual violence. But yes, we know that as with most 
militiamen and militants, the members of "Mujeres Libres" ended up in prison, in exile, 
or, at best, subjected to absolute silence denying that they had participated in this 
organization. Not even, from the outside, in exile, they managed to maintain organized 
structures in the clandestine, reason why at the three years, in 1939, "Free Women" ended 
up dissolving. Although they have maintained a legacy: "they have created a great desire 
in the women of freedom for all of us", affirms Ruíz Roa. And so, as Thiago also points 
out, "one must know the history of these women in order to question machismo."

Source: 
http://www.publico.es/politica/memoria-publica/80-anos-mujeres-libres-xxx-mujeres-libres-anarquistas-revolucionaron-club-obrera.html

Translation> Sol de Abril

Related Items:

https://noticiasanarquistas.noblogs.org/post/2017/12/14/espanha-a-historica-revista-mujeres-libres-1936-1938-an-established-in-internet/

https://noticiasanarquistas.noblogs.org/post/2017/12/09/espanha-lancamento-lutaram-contra-a-hidri-do-patriarcado-mulheres-livres-de-nekane-jurado/

https://noticiasanarquistas.noblogs.org/post/2017/09/26/espanha-relationship-women-free-orange-of-marath-ackelsberg/

------------------------------

Message: 2





The 27/12 was publicly released by official media, a 180-page report entitled RAM, 
prepared by the ministry of security of the nation in conjunction with the provincial 
governments of río negro, neuquén and chubut, where To criminalize, demonize and persecute 
the mapuche who organize and resist, to social activists, to the left and to anarchism. 
---- By deliberately unfounded characterizations and based on elements of judicial 
investigations which have not yet been closed but have been presented as evidence of "the 
violence and danger" of the ram group (mapuche ancestral resistance), the unacceptable 
fascist and minister bullrich states that, Called Ram is "a movement that promotes the 
struggle and does not recognize the Argentine state and the laws of the provinces". this 
report also links several groups as if they had some kind of relationship and as if, a 
priori, they had Committed some crime when their only actions were solidarity against the 
brutal repression of mapuche communities which already left a balance of 2 Dead: Santiago 
Maldonado and Rafael Nahuel.

In the reference report, 96 judicial cases are linked from 2010 onwards, all open or even 
closed due to lack of merit, and various popular demonstrations and public activities, as 
if they were developed in the The same group called ram; mixing confusedly anarchist 
political organizations and alternative media. These judicial assemblies were also driven 
by the state in Brazil, Spain and chile to libertarian and other luchadorxs.

The State again tries to demonize and divide various popular movements, with the aim of 
creating an internal enemy, a scapegoat that justifies the spiralling repression of social 
protest against the permanent anti-grassroots measures that lead. They try to install to 
criticize and organize in front of the unjust murders that their mismxs committed outside, 
in itself, a criminal act. It seems that solidarity with the Kurdish movement, which is 
facing the worst of ISIS, involves terrorism. They want a common sense where they are 
fighting for their work or education, or in solidarity for the rights of all, they are 
criminals.
At the same time, trying to tarnish the image of the mapuche people, the report accuses 
them of "Ethno-nationalists" for fighting the historical colonialism that the Argentine 
and Chilean States unleashed on the indigenous peoples in extermination campaigns and the 
dispossession of the territory They do not care for powerful businessmen and large 
international Capitals, gambling to sow confusion and contribute to strengthening racism 
still in force.

We reject, in every sense, the unfounded and malicious allegations of the ministry of 
security and the provincial governments of chubut, Río Negro and neuquén and we sympathise 
with the organizations and people of different sectors of the people. This report and its 
political intent is the re-trick of the government to change against the huge 
mobilizations felt by the life of Santiago Maldonado, for the order of justice for the 
murder of Rafael Nahuel and for the legitimate self-defence he exerted in this hot 
December and on the streets the most vulnerable working people: Jubiladxs and women who 
receive the universal child allowance, and left a balance of at least 4 popular militants 
with the loss of eye vision. Where's the showdown? It is the return that they bring us 
because they do not know how to deal with the worthy organization and repudiation of the 
peoples who, by little, begin to say enough! And to put a brake on adjustment policies. 
And it is that the repressive plan goes hand in hand with the reform package and the 
cheaper of the workforce they want to install in the Latin American region.

Since the ministry of security agreed to form a joint commission and joint operational 
command, composed of federal and provincial forces of chubut, Río Negro and neuquen where 
they also promise to use the judicial apparatus to adjudicate before there is an 
investigation (as is indeed the case "report"), or make unconstitutional double judgments 
as in the case of Facundo Jones Huala, but endorsed media. The Color data of the report is 
that it appears as proof of the violence used by ram, the court held on August 1 for the 
freedom of facundo, photo where it is expressly viewed to Santiago Maldonado, who was then 
murdered by the bestial Repression of 130 gendarmes against 10 partners. They appear as 
evidence too, working tools like saws, screwdrivers, stones, a gross mockery.

About the report and who aims to criminalize

The list of people and organizations involved directly or indirectly with ram is long and 
tedious, outrageous because every day we put our strength to lift a world where the 
patriarchal, racist, capitalist, injustice, from originating communities like From, trade 
unions, feminists, human rights, trade unions, and social. To all of you / your fighters / 
is popular we provide our solidarity with the demonization of the government to change and 
we call on social organizations to repudiate and curb this miserable scenario they are 
preparing.

As a means of contributing to information, we disseminate what appears in the report of 
the ministry of security:

https://es.scribd.com/.../RAM-Informe-conjunto-realizado-entr...

- people who appear as prominent members of the RAM: Moira Millán (women from good 
living-community catch mahuiza); Facundo Jones Huala (pu lof in resistance)

- organizations / media that are mentioned as linked to RAM:

Argentine Libertarian Federation; regional anarchist collective la plata; Libertarian 
socialist action; Irpgf (popular revolutionary people's guerrilla force) - Syria -; 
Kurdistan Latin America (News Portal)

- organizations / media that are linked to ram for demonstrating solidarity with the 
Kurdish people who struggle for their self-determination:

FM 99.5 program Zumba the mob, (Rnma); editorial sudestada; the churqui, cultural center, 
Moreno; socialist convergence; Anarchist Federation of Rosario

- organizations that are directly linked by allegedly financing ram:

Tie; Ipes (Social Rights Promotion Institute)

- organization that is directly linked to ram, for alleged military training:

Farc-Colombia -

And a shameful list of at least 20 people, some simply by police identification, others by 
arrests in demonstrations or arbitrarily, are presented to the ministry of security as 
part of the ram's actions.

Patricia Bullrich (Minister of security), the government of Mauritius Macri and the 
provincial governments of Mariano Arcioni (Chubut), Omar Gutierrez (Neuquén) and Alberto 
Weretilneck (Río Negro), are responsible for intimidation, threats, and any danger Let 
them expose us to their repressive forces.

No more mounts!
Freedom To Facundo Jones Huala!
Justice for Santiago Maldonado and Rafael Nahuel!
The ones who fight!

https://www.facebook.com/espaciolibertarioparana/posts/894036084103466

------------------------------

Message: 3






The advent of the Trump Administration in the US has witnessed more waves of attacks on 
civil liberties, more intense police repression, more tax cuts favouring the rich, the 
beefing up of the military and a range of other onslaughts. Employers have been encouraged 
to intensify their war path against workers on the job. Whilst an important base of 
support of the Trump electoral campaign has been demoralised workers in the "rust belt" 
hard hit by de-industrialisation. Lately Trump has even been whipping up support from 
ultra right wing forces by his provocative tweets. The union bureaucracy associated with 
the AFL-CIO-CIA has typically announced its willingness to "work" with the Trump 
administration. ---- The syndicalist movement and the so called anarchist milieu is 
currently in a poor state, unable to tackle the increased tempo of the employer offensive 
associated with the Trump presidency. According to a major article in the Summer edition 
2017 of "Industrial Worker" paper of the IWW (Industrial Workers of the World) a major 
tendency in the organisation is associated with the oppression mongering and enthusiasm 
for identity politics which is such a feature of the middle class leftist subculture. 
Interwoven with this tendency is the influence of much Stalinist legacy informed "navel 
gazing" associated with "safe spaces policies" featuring in many IWW locals and the so 
called "anarchist" milieu. This tendency in the IWW, however is being confronted by an 
industrial organising approach.
A major contribution to this unwholesome influence of the former tendency must be seen in 
regard to the IWW's resurgence in the 1960s stemming from a major influx of radical 
students and workers with high levels of autonomy in their jobs associated with the 
education and the university milieu. Constituting a significant base of its membership. As 
a result, the resurgent IWW lacked the core of highly experienced militants which played 
such a dynamic role in its formation and expansion in the early 20th century.

"Incremental Shop" Versus "Strategic" Organising

The contemporary IWW pursues all manner of organising drives in diverse sectors Whilst for 
many years has engaged in a sort of incremental organising of mainly small shops oriented 
toward winning contracts which have had no-strike clauses. Where there has been success in 
this approach, the result has been a situation similar to shops organised by some sections 
of the corporate unions with a largely passive membership. Effectively in these shops the 
IWW had become a micro democratic version of the corporate unions. (1)
Whilst another focus by Wobblies and some in the so called "anarchist" milieu has been 
"solidarity networks". Where relatively small groups of workers are assisted with 
grievances. A role performed by the corporate unions on occasion, which in no way raises 
the morale of workers on a large scale and plays into the role of activoid super heroes 
and pseudo social workers. It fits neatly into middle class leftist oppression mongering 
and guilt tripping, providing excuses for social occasions and has nothing to do with 
serious syndicalist industrial organising. Again this activity is very much in the orbit 
of corporate unionism. The corporate unions are effectively having their normal work 
fanned out to leftist activoids, who do it for free.
In sharp contrast, key militants of the IWW in its early days, displayed an excellent 
grasp of strategic organising and the associated deployment of limited personnel and 
resources in key sectors. Success in this organising would facilitate the winning of major 
victories in the class struggle raising the morale of workers across industries, slowing 
the tempo of the employer offensive and turning the tide in the class struggle. 
Facilitating strike waves and the emergence of transitional steps toward mass syndicalist 
industrial unionism. This orientation is illustrated with the IWW's organising drives in 
the Philadelphia maritime sector up until the mid 20's and the Detroit auto industry in 
1937. This memoir of Sam Dolgoff throws important light on this and other organising 
issues which are critical to a resurgent mass syndicalist union movement.
This memoir by Sam Dolgoff's son, Anatole sheds light on his father's many years of 
militancy in the IWW and various socialist and anarchist groups. After initially being 
involved in the Socialist Party, he was expelled as he was critical of the careerism of 
its middle class and student members and statism. Dolgoff went on to be involved in a 
range of anarchist and syndicalist groups.
In the early to mid 1920's he joined the syndicalist IWW. The author shows he became drawn 
into its strategic organising and associated major organising controversies in the 
organisation. Dolgoff played an important role in the IWW organising drive amongst soft 
coal miners in South Illinois in the 1920's which resulted in the Progressive Mine Workers 
Union (PMWU) becoming closely associated with the IWW. Dolgoff played a very effective 
role as a soap boxer helping defeat the well funded and resourced Communist Party United 
Mine Workers Union attempt to make inroads in the base of the PMWU.

"Taft-Hartley" Pledges

A major organising controversy in the IWW involving Dolgoff discussed in the book which 
touched on the question of strategic organising versus a simplistic incremental growth in 
non strategic sectors was associated with the loss of the Cleveland Metal Shops in the mid 
1950's. A major contributing factor to a devastating IWW split in the mid 1950's. It is 
discussed in a quote from an analysis by Jeff Stein. It involves the issue of whether IWW 
shops should sign the anti-radical Taft-Hartley Act pledges. Dolgoff and others opposed 
the signing of these pledges due to the obvious contradicting of the IWW's revolutionary 
aims. According to Stein this stance propelled this huge chunk of the remaining membership 
and industrial base of the organisation to leave.
However, the Cleveland shops were all drawn into fixed term contracts in breach of the IWW 
constitution. These IWW shops were also effectively marginalised, as they were surrounded 
by the AFL-CIO business union covered shops cemented in placed by a vast web of contracts. 
Consequently the IWW had ceased to be an expanding movement based on direct action on the 
job and inspiring workers in diverse sectors to follow suit in strike waves. The IWW in 
Cleveland had effectively become a micro democratic version of the business unions and had 
effectively left the syndicalist fold. Whilst the original breakthrough in the Cleveland 
shops stemmed from a spin-off of an unsuccessful strategic organising drive in Detroit 
auto in 1937.
Sam Dolgoff is most notable in the history of US syndicalism and anarchism in the 20th 
Century apart from his soap boxing and organising activity on behalf of the IWW, his 
authorship and editorship of a series of important books and pamphlets on aspects of 
anarchism and syndicalism, is his involvement in a range of different anarchist groups and 
publications with mostly an anarcho-syndicalist orientation from the 1920's to the 1990's. 
The most notable being the Vanguard Group 1932 to 1939 with its paper "Vanguard" and the 
Libertarian League (mid 1950's to mid 1960's) with its publication "Views and Comments".

"The Vanguard Group"

"Vanguard" was one of the most outstanding on the international plane of anarchist 
publications. Dolgoff mainly focused on labour issues with his regular "On the Class War 
Front" column. It was in sharp contrast to today's exotic identity politics and oppression 
mongering obsessed (2) leftist rags. The key figure in Vanguard who wrote under the pen 
name SENEX was Mark Schmidt. The author shows how despite being extremely opposed to the 
murderous policies of the early Bolshevik regime in Russia following the October 1917 
Coup, he became drawn into the Stalinist orbit and copied their paranoid conspiratorial 
ways. Contributed by the panorama of international expanding Stalinism and the rise of 
Fascism in those years. The author shows these factors together with controversy over 
whether to support the Allied war effort against the Axis in WWII contributed to the 
demise of the group and paper. Another factor the author misses is the demoralisation of 
the international anarchist and syndicalist movements associated with the defeat of the 
Spanish Revolution of 1936-39.

"The Libertarian League"

In regard to the Libertarian League the author discusses some of the major activities of 
the group which included solidarity for overseas anarchist and syndicalist militants 
facing state repression and exposing the authoritarian nature of the Castro Regime in 
Cuba. The author outlines many of the interesting speakers who featured at the regular 
forums of the group. However due to various factors beyond the group's control it was 
unable to break out of being a small circle. The author fails to mention that it was 
finally dissolved by Dolgoff and his closest collaborators due to an influx of drugs and 
violence obsessed elements.
In Dolgoff's final years of militancy, the author shows he became involved in the 
Libertarian Labor Review, now Anarcho-Syndicalist Review group. Its origins being amongst 
a group of young militants in the IWW involved in the Rank-and-File Organising Committee. 
They were influenced by Dolgoff's ideas on industrial strategy favouring the IWW linking 
up with wildcat and grass roots workplace insurgencies. It opposed the IWW focusing on 
incremental organising of shops based on winning contracts based on the Cleveland metal 
shops experience of the 1930's-50' and NLRB (National Labor Relations Board) recognition 
for shop bargaining coverage.
In conclusion, the book provides plenty of food for thought about what serious syndicalist 
organising should look like and important organising controversies in the US which are 
also relevant to other countries in certain aspects. Whilst providing plenty of gritty and 
graphic portraits of US radicals in the 20th Century. However, the book is marred by the 
author's over indulgence with some aspects of Dolgoff s private life.
Mark McGuire

Notes:

1. See Discussion on Libcom.org of the US IWW and contracts.
2. See "Fellow Worker: The Life of Fred Thompson" Edited and Compiled by David Roediger 
Published by Charles H. Kerr. For a discussion of IWW organising in the Detroit Auto 
Industry in the 1930's.

* Paper of the Anarcho-Syndicalist Network
Vol.35 No.3 (210) Dec.2017 - Jan.2018 www.rebelworker.org

------------------------------

Message: 4





A combativity not insignificant, but no anti-capitalist project to stop 
deindustrialization ... The CGT federation of metallurgy sometimes gives the impression of 
wanting to "  advise decision makers  ". This is not our role ! ---- Mixed atmosphere at 
the 41 st congress of the CGT Federation of Metallurgy, which was held from 20 to 24 
November in Dijon. Of the 485 delegates expected, only 390 made the trip. Low 
participation that reflects the lack of investment of many unions in federal life. The 
guidance document was very little amended. The federation hopes to improve participation 
in the future by strengthening union training, and encourages elected representatives to 
use at least 50  % of their discharge time to become active outside the company, whether 
at the federal level or interpro.

Many unions sin indeed by excessive localism, the fold on their box ... which however does 
not work in autarky !

The entire metal industry is thus threatened by the introduction of a particularly 
regressive collective agreement, which could then inspire other branches. It provides for 
the implementation of the "job  quotation  " which would allow the employer to pay the 
employees no longer according to their know-how and their experience, but according to the 
nature of the task. It is therefore clearly open the possibility of wage cuts as the job 
changes. The federation demonstrated on October 13 to influence the negotiation, linking 
this mobilization to the more general struggle against the Macron ordinances.

In the movement against the Labor law, in 2016, the CGT-Metallurgy had been quite 
combative, strongly encouraging its unions to organize strikes and to forget a little sit 
in the joint bodies to participate in blocking actions.

Class struggle or "  growth  " ?
During the opening speech of the congress, the federal secretary, Frédéric Sanchez, 
advocated a "  more just society  " through the "  overtaking of capitalism  ". In a very 
internationalist posture, he summoned Greece, Brazil, Argentina, Turkey, India or Italy to 
conclude that "  whatever the country, the aspiration to fight against capitalism is the 
same  ". He also stressed the importance of welcoming migrant workers. However, when 
called for defense inch of Social Security, we could not help but wonder: from the 2 e 
conference notebook page, a pub it was for insurance ... who precisely have interest in 
the retreat of the Secu !

The congress texts are also quite disconnected from the combativity expressed in 2016. 
Consensual, not very demanding, they do not show a great ambition on the social and 
ecological transformation of society. On the contrary, they multiply references to " 
growth  " and "  purchasing power  " ... but do not cite the class struggle once. They 
also join a trend of the federation to invest in a role of trade union expertise - a 
characteristic of the refocusing of the CFDT in the 1980s. A bit like during the Assises 
de l'industrie, an initiative held by the CGT in last February, we will provide "  advice 
On public investment, research, industrial strategy ... But advising decision-makers, does 
that make sense for a trade union organization, as long as industry remains, in any case, 
the private property of capitalists ? [1]

Bernard (AL Auvergne)

[1] See the leaflet of AL produced at the time: "  To relocate the industry: that it 
changes hands  ", on Alternativelibertaire.org

http://www.alternativelibertaire.org/?CGT-Metallurgie-Vers-un-syndicalisme-d-expertise

------------------------------

Message: 5






Temps obscurs offers a didactic analysis of the major issues of modern fascism, and can 
even be a valuable tool for any activist concerned to join the fight against fascism. ---- 
The work of Matthieu Gallandier and Sébastien Ibo, proposes to return to the modern 
fascist phenomenon, with a grid of materialistic analysis. It circumscribes this 
phenomenon more than Arendt does (evoking a "  totalitarian  " principle, perhaps too 
broad), and is part of the Marxist tradition of Daniel Guérin, who has managed to link 
fascism to a socio-economic totality. and determined policy. ---- Daniel Guérin, Fascism 
and Big Capital, chronic to read in Alternative libertaire of December 2014. ---- The 
first chapter proposes a history of fascism. Specificity of fascism appear: the first 
forms fascist policies, which appeared in France at the end of the XIX th century advocate 
modernization, unlike the traditional right, conservative. Gustave Le Bon, Barrès, 
Maurras, but also Boulanger, constitute the central figures of this French pre-fascism.

Specifically, the progressive development of Italian fascism and German Nazism after the 
First World War is described in the context of national socio-political difficulties, and 
especially during the formation of anti-worker militias. It can be seen then that these 
fascisms do not develop against capital, but on the contrary that they can first serve its 
intimate interests. The horror of the concentration and extermination camps, in the 
context of the "  final solution  ", as well as the specificity of modern anti-Semitism, 
are of course envisaged, as well as the tactical and cathartic function of violence. 
fascist (which eventually becomes part of state violence).

The development of fascism and Nazism, in Italy and Germany, in the 1920s and 30s, is 
inseparable from a crisis context: these ideologies propose a Keynesian revival policy, 
and advocate an interclassist alliance. They are primarily aimed at the working classes. 
Yet fascism in power eventually leads social policies favorable to the bourgeoisie, 
develops a primary anti-communism, and finally proposes an ultra-nationalist 
altercapitalism, set around a charismatic and authoritarian leader.

The authors insist that, by definition, this fascism can not be anti-capitalist, because 
strict anti-capitalism would end up undermining its principle of interclassist national 
unity (indeed, any coherent anticapitalism ends up developing social struggles against 
bourgeoisie, and also remains internationalist).

It is also the failure of the traditional bourgeois parties in the face of the crisis that 
has brought the fascists to power.

An anti-Semitic businessman, Alain Soral is at the head of a particular trend of the 
French far right
The second chapter returns to "   the new face of fascism   ". It offers a contemporary 
panorama. The crisis of 2008 contributes to barbarization of the exploitation, and to 
favor hard austerity policies. The "   third way   " that constitutes the altercapitalist 
extreme right finds a certain increase of energy.

Anti-Muslim racism (FN) and radical anti-Semitism (Equality and Reconciliation) define how 
these extreme rights determine their principle of national unity and interclassist 
alliance. The book distinguishes the great xenophobic far-right parties (FN) from the 
small street groups (Ayoub). The latter claim more the fascist heritage. But these two 
movements can also maintain intimate relationships. It is to this extent that the book 
considers that fascism remains a current phenomenon.

The book returns to the novelties of these extreme contemporary rights: an Islamophobia 
become structural. But also the pseudo-defense of the rights of women and homosexuals, 
used to develop the rejection of Muslims deemed "   homophobic   " and "   masculinist ". 
In reality, far-right ideology remains fundamentally Petainist, patriarchal and 
homophobic, but this superficial pinkwashing is only a means of spreading a virulent 
Islamophobia. Conspiracy, and the development of the Internet, are also data that redraw 
the contours of these extreme rights.

Finally, the book ends with a panorama of the territories of the extreme right: French 
far-right localities are analyzed, as well as the regionalist ideology that these currents 
carry. Then the international and geopolitical question posed by these extreme rights is 
briefly developed. As a necessary counterpoint, an inventory of the fights against fascism 
is finally exposed.

It is a pleasant book to read, didactic, without technical vocabulary, which is addressed 
to any person anxious to understand the major issues of modern fascism, and the 
contemporary extreme right. It focuses on the key points to remember, and can even be a 
valuable tool for any activist eager to join the fight against fascism.

Benoît (AL Montpellier)

Matthieu Gallandier and Sébastien Ibo, Dark Times. Nationalism and Fascism in France and 
Europe, Acratie Publishing, 164 pages, 13 euros.

http://www.alternativelibertaire.org/?Fascisme-Temps-obscurs

------------------------------

Message: 6






"  I think we should have been more numerous and more to take the plunge. Hundreds of 
internationalist volunteers on the ground, while Daesh has managed to attract more than 
30,000 people to "jihad" ...  " ---- Libertarian Alternative reproduces the blog posts 
Kurdistan-Autogestion-Revolution , travel journal of a comrade engaged in the YPG. ---- 
Over the weeks, he will testify to the life within the fighting militias, the debates that 
take place there and the experience of the democratic confederalism in the liberated 
zones. ---- Hello to all ! ---- After a long silence, I resume the pen to draw 
(temporarily) my bow. ---- I left Syria and have been back in Europe for a few weeks. 
After having participated in the battle of Mansourah, that I related on this blog, I 
chained with that of Raqqa, capital then tomb of the caliphate. A painful, cruel, 
suffocating battle ... I will not write more, for the moment, on the subject. You have 
been able to read enough various reports to make an image of it.

I then spent several weeks in the back, with my classmates, where I participated in some 
political and social projects, but where I also not quite decompressed. And here I am 
back, after the obligatory passage by Kurdistan of Iraq, then in the middle of a tumult 
following the tragicomic referendum of independence of Barzani.

Sorry for keeping such an erratic diary. I must admit that despite my good resolutions, it 
was far from being my priority ... I also believe that I was not very satisfied with my 
first tickets. It is difficult, when one is caught in the whirlwind of a revolution, to 
produce a relevant analysis. Although the field experience is irreplaceable, it may take 
some time and distance to analyze the situation more calmly.

Do I have any regrets ?

Not to have committed anyway. I think we should have been more numerous and more to take 
the plunge. A few hundred internationalist volunteers on the ground, while Daesh has 
managed to attract more than 30,000 people to "  jihad  " ... There are plenty of excuses 
for not taking part in this fight. But to wait for the perfect revolution before acting is 
to condemn oneself to impotence.

And then, after having shared the lives of these brave and self-sacrificing militiamen, 
seen comrades fall in the fight for freedom and revolution, it is painful - it's a 
euphemism - to read comments malicious or slanderous on the Internet, by rebels living ...

Let it be said: after Raqqa, nothing is finished. The revolution has never needed the 
sincere support of the revolutionaries so much, while the future of Syria - and more 
broadly of the Middle East - is subject to inter-imperialist tensions. Of course, we must 
be critical in our support, but a criticism only comes if it is linked to a sincere and 
concrete involvement in this fight. This is what sets it apart from the dilettante commentary.

In these few lines, I closed my participation in this blog and I give the keyboard to 
another friend of Alternative Libertaire, who arrived in Rojava shortly before my departure.

I hope to meet you in the struggles, and during meetings that AL will organize during 2018.

See you soon !

Arthur Aberlin, December 27, 2017

http://www.alternativelibertaire.org/?Un-communiste-libertaire-dans-les-YPG-16-Je-tire-ma-reverence-la-lutte-continue

------------------------------

Message: 7






This article is about the direction of PKK , whether getting closer to the Idea of their 
leader , Ocalan, or not. In the same time it remind the supporters to the Kurdish in 
Rojava and Bakur, Turkey Kurdistan, the only solidarity attitude neither correct nor 
useful. They need to have a critical solidarity attitude. ---- Where is the Kurdistan 
Workers' Party (PKK) heading? ---- by Zaher Baher ---- Since the Kurdistan Workers' Party 
(PKK) formed it has gone through difficult times but never like now. The best part of PKK 
struggle was the period of unilateral ceasefire. That was the period when the PKK 
flourished and the Kurdish people in Bakur rested. It was also a very good opportunity for 
the PKK to focus on the towns and cities to organise itself better.

That was just one of the positive things that the PKK managed to achieve during the 
ceasefire. In fact during this period it managed to make more contacts outside Turkey and 
gained support and solidarity from many leftists, trade unionists, communists, socialists 
and even anarchists. In addition, the PKK exploited the period to discuss and debate among 
its members and its supporters the social movement and the idea of rejecting the nation 
state. In short the PKK was on the brink of transforming itself from a military force to a 
social force, from guerrilla war to civil resistance and from a fighting movement to a 
social movement.

All this progress worked very well and even Rojava benefited from it until Apri 2015 when 
Erdogan cut off all contact between Ocalan and the outside world. The period between April 
and June 2015, was a tumultuous and fragile period in both the Kurdish territory and the 
whole of Turkey. On 20/07/2015 there was a terrorist attack on the Youth Wing and the 
Socialist Youth Associations Federation (SGDF) gathering in Suruc that killed 33 people 
and injured 104. This was followed by the killing of a couple of police officers allegedly 
by the PKK. Erdogan and his National intelligence Organisation, MIT, welcomed this 
opportunity to force the PKK to breach its ceasefire and involve them in an unwelcome war.

Since then, the PKK has been in crisis especially when embracing the announcement of war 
by the State. Erdogan launched war not just against the PKK but, in fact, against all 
Kurds in Turkey by increasing the level of its brutality especially after the PKK started 
street fighting and resisted in many towns. The PKK announced its resistance, a positive 
self-defence resistance, but in fact it was self-defeating and self-destroying. The State 
of Turkey did not stop fighting the PKK and Kurds inside Turkey, but also extended its 
fighting to Iraqi Kurdistan.

The PKK has given a very good excuse to the State of Turkey to show its hand and destroy 
many towns and villages and kill whoever resisted its authority, by any means. It 
dismantled most of the Kurdish Municipalities that were under the control of the Peoples' 
Democratic Party, HPD, and the people. Over 2000 people were killed, 11 MPs arrested 
including the chair and co-chair of the HDP, more than 134 members of the Municipalities 
arrested, around 500,000 people displaced and evacuated and Sur, an ancient town in 
Diyarbakir, (in Kurdish Amed) was almost entirely destroyed. Internationally, the US, UK, 
France and Germany blamed the PKK and insisting that it was a terrorist organisation. 
Their media attacked the PKK and did not cover the Turkish State atrocity against the 
Kurdish people, or very little coverage. In addition, Turkish jet fighters attacked the 
PKK base in the Qandil mountains and the villages at the foot of the Qandil daily from the 
outset and once or twice weekly thereafter for months. This destroyed the villages, 
burning and poisoning the environment and killing many Kurdish villagers and animals.

This all took place before the eyes of those same European and US governments. In fact, 
they showed their support for Turkey whilst the Tory government in the UK still continued 
its arms deal with Turkey.

In the end, the PKK stopped street fighting but it was too late as the war was lost with 
the cost of enormous damage. Surprisingly, as far as I know up to this moment, nobody in 
the PKK has taken responsibility for using these wrong tactics and changing their 
strategy. And, worse than that, those so-called supporters of Rojava and Bakur were silent 
about shifting the PKK to street fighting.

In my opinion, since then, the PKK has been in deep crisis. Now it is facing a couple of 
choices. Either it needs to go back to where it was in the 1990s. In choosing this, it 
achieves absolutely nothing apart from more killing and further destruction of Kurdistan. 
Or it could simply disarm the majority of its forces and withdraw to the mountains on the 
border whilst announcing a ceasefire regardless of whether or not the State of Turkey 
agrees. This can be the first step to save their skin and then to encourage their 
supporters in the towns and cities in the whole of Turkey to become centres for struggle 
whilst building social movements. This is the only way if the PKK wants to get out of its 
crisis and do something better for Kurds.

I believe this step may be extremely difficult for the PKK because, since July 2015, it 
has gone backwards instead of going forwards and has moved away from Ocalan's principle 
and main aim of building Democratic Confederalism . Also, at present, PKK leaders, 
especially its military commanders, speak a different language to Ocalan and, maybe, from 
a tiny minority in the PKK as well who talk about a Kurdish state, uniting the Kurdish 
people and lots of nationalist rhetoric.

In Iraqi Kurdistan where the PKK has a very strong military base and is ideologically 
strong, they have not built one single local group in the last 20 years. They have not 
even worked at introducing the experiment of Rojava and Bakur to the Kurdish there. They 
did not help their supporters in that part of Kurdistan to do anything more effective than 
recruiting them as fighters. For me, the PKK action in Turkey and Iraqi Kurdistan has 
either nothing or very little to do with Ocalan's new idea.

On 23/12/2017, the top commander of the PKK, Jamil Bayik, who is also the co-chair of the 
Kurdish Community Council, Jamil Bayik, was interviewed by Ronahi TV about the current 
situation in Iraqi Kurdistan which has been in deep crisis since 2015 and saw huge 
protests and demonstrations between 18/12/17 and 20/12/17. He said the only solution to 
the crisis is " to form a new government". While it was a good opportunity for him to talk 
about the roots of the problems and solutions in line with Ocalan's new idea of Democratic 
Confederalism, he knows very well that what he said is not the solution because a new 
government can only be formed from the current political parties while all of them are 
corrupted and are agents of Iran and Turkey. They have proved that political parties 
cannot bring prosperity and equality to their own people.

On 28/12/17 Murat Karaylian, the second commander of the PKK, in his interview to Chra TV 
said, " They have suggestions for the crisis that Kurdish people in Iraqi Kurdistan are 
facing". He believes in forming a Commission from different sides, political parties and 
organisations. He suggested that the Commission could have meetings with people to find 
out what, exactly, they want. However, Mr Karaylian knows full well what the people want, 
but the problem is people do not get what they want under the KRG regime. He simply talks 
nonsense, instead of offering their help and support to people to organise themselves 
independently, just as people did in Rojava, and work towards the main gaol of Democratic 
Confederalism.

So where is the PKK heading? Answering this question is not easy but the current direction 
of the PKK neither benefits itself nor the Kurdish people. However, I am sure the future 
will answer this question, and we may not need to wait long.

Zaherbaher.com

https://www.anarkismo.net/article/30759

------------------------------

Message: 8






Tonight anarchists will gather on both sides of the Atlantic to show solidarity with 
prisoners at an often difficult time of year as they spend their time behind bars rather 
than with family or friends for the holidays. ---- In London there will be demos at 
Brixton and Pentonville prisons, continuing a tradition of several years, The rally at HMP 
Pentonville, organised this year by Prisoners Fightback, will run from 8.30pm-9.30pm. The 
larger Brixton event is being organised by the London Campaign Against Police and State 
Violence and will take place from 6pm-9pm. ---- In a statement, LCAPSV said: ---- Bring 
banners and something you can make some noise with (pots, pans, kitchen utensils, drums, 
sirens, speakers, megaphones, horns, your voices!) ---- Black people are killed by the 
state on the streets, but they are also killed under incarceration. Jimmy Mubenga was 
suffocated by racist G4S security guards on an aeroplane.
Sean Rigg was asphyxiated in Brixton police station. Ricky Bishop was also killed in 
police custody at Brixton police station. Sarah Campbell died within hours of arriving at 
Styal Prison. 15 year old Garthe Myatt was killed by security guards at Rainsbrook Secure 
Training Centre. Sarah Reed, a victim of sexual violence and police violence, died in a 
cell at Holloway Prison. Between 1990-2017 just under 6,000 people have died in prison and 
police custody. 33 people have died in immigration detention since 2000. Few have ever 
received justice.

Where they don't kill you outright, prisons take time from you, isolate you from your 
community and your family and do the same to your loved ones on the outside. This is not 
done at random, but is systematically racist in its intent and practice. It is another 
side of state racism that is elsewhere seen in the racist application of stop and search, 
immigration law, and extra-judicial killings.

The proportion of people of African-Caribbean and African descent incarcerated here is 
almost seven times greater to their share of the population. In the United States, the 
proportion of black prisoners to population is about four times greater.

Incarceration is not only destructive of the lives of black men and women, but also the 
men, women and children who make up their families, their friends, their lovers and their 
lives. Every life destroyed inside prison includes many other lives destroyed outside of it.

Noise demos outside of prisons are a continuing tradition across the world. A way of 
expressing solidarity for people imprisoned during the New Year, remembering those held 
captive by the state. A noise demo breaks the isolation and alienation of the cells our 
enemies create, but it does not have to stop at that. It is time to imagine a world 
without incarceration, without detention, without racism and injustice. Please join us to 
make noise in solidarity with those currently incarcerated and to imagine a world without 
prisons.

Across the pond, the US version is going from strength to strength, with rallies in 
Gainsville, Durham, Chicago, New York, Milwaukee, Omaha, Dallas and Quebec in Canada.

https://freedomnews.org.uk/solidarity-with-prisoners-on-new-years-eve/

------------------------------