Ancient fossils of a whale species thought to be found only in southern waters have been discovered at northern sites in Japan and Italy.
![]() |
| The smallest baleen whale, Caperea marginata, compared to the largest: the blue whale, Balaenoptera musculus [Credit: Carl Buell] |
Its evolutionary origins are still hotly debated. It has no close living relative and is the only major whale lineage that is entirely restricted to the Southern Hemisphere.
Fossils related to the pygmy right whale, some of them up to 10 million years old, have been found in Australia, Argentina and Peru. Together, they suggest that pygmy right whales have always been true southerners – as endemic to this part of the world as koalas and kangaroos are to Australia.
Or, at least, that’s what we thought until the northern find.
Northern find
In a paper published in Current Biology, our international team (spanning three continents) describes two Caperea-like fossils that completely turn the story of this bizarre whale on its head.
![]() |
| Ear bones of a living pygmy right whale (left, mirrored for comparison), the fossil from Italy (centre) and the fossil from Japan (right) [Credit: Tsai et al. (2017) Current Biology] |
Finding Caperea in the north was truly unexpected. Imagine stumbling across a kangaroo in Scotland, or a polar bear in Antarctica! So how did Caperea end up in northern seas? Even more intriguingly, why is it no longer there?
The age of the northern fossils provides a vital clue. Compared to their southern counterparts, the northern specimens are relatively young: they lived about 1.8 million years ago in Italy and just 500,000-900,000 years ago in Japan.
These dates coincide with a time of pronounced global cooling - the ice age - starting about 2.5 million years ago.
Cooling waters
Prior to the ice age, Caperea only lived in the south, just like today. To the north of its habitat lay warm, tropical seas that offered little in the way of food.
But these good times would not last. As glacial gave way to interglacial, the tropical seas warmed and their nutrient bounty declined. What was once a tropical gateway became an impassable barrier, leaving populations trapped on either side of the equator in a warming world.
Whereas some divided marine mammal populations evolved into separate northern and southern species, such as elephant seals and right whales, others declined to extinction in one hemisphere. Caperea in the north had the latter fate.
So how did such a substantial, geologically recent change to the distribution and ecology of whales go unnoticed until now?
Unlike their cousins on land, fossils of marine mammals from the last 2 million years are relatively rare. In fact, we know more about marine mammals living 5 million years ago than we do about their descendants living a mere 100,000 years ago.
![]() |
| Dr Felix Marx and Dr Erich Fitzgerald with pgymy right whale specimen from Museums Victoria's Collection [Credit: Museums Victoria] |
Today, there are only a few places where ice age whale fossils have nonetheless come to light, often because geological forces caused some areas to rise upwards and, once again, out of the water.
The Northern Hemisphere pygmy right whales open a rare window on this most recent phase of marine mammal evolution, and suggest interesting times and unexpected histories. What might we find in future? Tasmanian walruses? Penguins in Alaska?
Fossils are powerful messengers from the past. That such a dramatic shift in the geographic range and ecology of pygmy right whales occurred so rapidly is a reminder of the profound influence of climate change on the ocean.
Our warming world may lead to tropical seas becoming ever more inhospitable to marine mammals, with the equator halting the movement of once widely distributed species, such as rorquals.
Only time will tell if climatic division into northern and southern populations leads to more evolution or extinction of marine mammals.
Authors: Felix Georg Marx & Erich Fitzgerald | Source: The Conversation [October 10, 2017]









