"Directed to OWK: Informed Human" by HippoBetSource - 5.12.17

Entry Submitted by HippoBetSource at 6:23 PM EDT on May 12, 2017

RE: "Re: Informed Human" - One Who Knows - 5.9.17

OWK, I will admit that you've got me at a loss. I had the notion to respond by playing along as if I had actually been apprehended, as you claimed would happen, which, needless to say, didn't. But then I thought, no; this is too serious and important to take lightly because you have really exposed yourself now by making outlandish accusations where you have nothing to back it because it's blatantly, unequivocally, categorically false!

I had divulged the handles I'd used in the last few weeks. I don't know who the others are you've listed. And if you had REAL, benevolent intel, you would already know that. You really need to learn the difference between taunting someone and testing someone's unique instincts they claim to have.

One thing you didn't think through, though, is...what if somebody whom I've called out as being Cabal doesn't get taken into custody, as you're always told happens, because it's not true? Or have you actually seen people being picked up, if not removed from the planet altogether? I'm going to go out on a tree-trunk sized limb and guess your intel has always been via second-hand knowledge, just like I'd presume is the case concerning the April 30th child-sacrifice rescues, for starters.

Whatever the case, I haven't posted or even really read much on this board all week. Why? Because people are in such a tunnel vision haze that they cannot see the forest for the trees. So I gave up trying to help them see outside their little world because I believe in free-will.

So imagine my surprise when I see you have involved me in this snafu, of sorts. Your idle threats just proves how much pull you ACTUALLY have vs. how much you THINK you have.

My "Betman" proved my point. And, incidentally, I was done posting after you unsurprisingly didn't respond to my bet proposal I'd placed in your court shortly thereafter via my Hippo handle. That is, until I saw this post and read your incredibly serious and unfounded accusations, which are completely worthy of a libel suit, I'd think. Or didn't you consider maybe you should obtain a shred of proof before sending that out into the world? Oh, that's right! The 'awake' doesn't need proof, conveniently enough, only the asleep majority does, right?

Be that as it may, you had stated, "Frankly, you may not even see this post. They are very good and very quick in the take down."

Well, that was written, what, on Tuesday? And today is already Friday...the first day I have seen the post, much less read it, mind you. Should I leave a light on?

In any case, why would I ask the exact same Plato question, when I didn't believe your answer the first time? Where is the sense in that? Discerning something like that only takes common sense, nothing higher.

Furthermore, if I didn't say it clearly enough before, your intel is something to be desired. You've said it yourself that you have no recollection of being anyone that you've been told you were in previous lives. Yet, you have no problem believing entities through channeling. Talk about an easy target for soul scalping. Or haven't you heard of that particular phrase before? I suggest ANYONE who is channeling beings should learn what it means before their next session because you're allowing them to possess your body.

WAKE UP!

This is most likely my last post under any handle; I don't know what else I can say to convince the community, because, like I said, I do believe in free-will. Life is all about learning from lessons, some harder than others.

I will end it with this: Call it a sixth sense, or simply going off 3D instincts, without the use of any kind of channeling, magic, what have you...it is my firm belief that what you are channeling is not cabal, as we know it, but rather the malevolent beings that want to replace the cabal as boss, only they won't bother playing behind the scenes; they don't care who knows. You can think of it like 2 bounty hunters after the same outlaw. They may play nicely at first. But once they're down the homestretch, all bets are off. There can only be one boss.

Now, if saying that is enough to make me full-fledged Cabal, which you're the only person who has ever accused me of that; well, that's pathetic, not to mention, I should already be rich without any RV.

Godspeed, all!

~HippoBetSource