New citations of research of a Moscow University scientist, Sergei Ostroumov, environmental science, aquatic toxicology, effects of chemicals (detergents, surfactants) on organisms

New citations of research of  a Moscow University scientist, Sergei Ostroumov, environmental science, aquatic toxicology, effects of chemicals (detergents, surfactants) on organisms
http://5bio5.blogspot.com/2017/02/new-citations-of-research-of-moscow.html

source of data:
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1995082916020061;

Inland Water Biology;

April 2016, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 196–199;

Comparative assessment of toxic effects of surfactants using biotesting methods;

Authors and affiliations:
E. V. Evsyunina
D. O. Taran
D. I. Stom (Email author for correspondence),
M. N. Saksonov
A. E. Balayan
M. A. Kirillova
E. N. Esimbekova
V. A. Kratasyuk;

1. 1.Irkutsk State University, Irkutsk, Russia;
2. 2.Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk Russia;
3. 3.Baikal Museum, Listvyanka, Irkutsk oblast, Russia;
4. 4.National Research Irkutsk State Technical University, Irkutsk,Russia;
5. 5.Institute of Biophysics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Krasnoyarsk, Russia;

1. 1.
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.

Aquatic Toxicology;

First Online: 

16 June 2016;

DOI: 10.1134/S1995082916020061;

Cite this article as:

Evsyunina, E.V., Taran, D.O., Stom, D.I. et al. Inland Water Biol (2016) 9: 196. doi:10.1134/S1995082916020061;

• 34Downloads

Abstract.

This study assesses the comparative sensitivity and possibility of obtaining fast results of various methods of biotesting for several surfactants: Tween 85, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), Fairy dishwashing gel, and Mif washing powder. The following test organisms are used for the study: luminescent bacteria Photobacterium phosphoreum (Beijerinck), preparation of Ecolum luminescent bacteria, unicellular algae Scenedesmus quadricauda (G.M. Smith), infusorian Paramecium caudatum (Ehrenberg), and crustacean Daphnia magna (Straus). It has been revealed that Fairy dishwashing gel possesses the strongest toxicity against the studied test objects. Daphnia and algae are most sensitive to the effects of Fairy and SDS, protozoan and luminescent bacteria are most sensitive to SDS, and Ecolum is most sensitive to Mif washing powder. The tested aquatic organisms and Ecolum are most tolerant to the effect of Tween 85.

Keywords

surfactants,biotesting,toxic , effect,survival,daphnia,algae,infusorian,bioluminescent bacteria,fluorescence of chlorophyll,

Original Russian Text © E.V. Evsyunina, D.O. Taran, D.I. Stom, M.N. Saksonov, A.E. Balayan, M.A. Kirillova, E.N. Esimbekova, V.A. Kratasyuk, 2016, published in Biologiya Vnutrennikh Vod, 2016, No. 2, pp. 89–93.

References

1. 1.
   Goryunova, S.V. and Ostroumov, S.A., The effect of anionic detergent on the green protococcal alga and seedlings of some angiosperms, Nauch. Dokl. Vyssh. Shk. Biol. Nauki, 1986, no. 7, pp. 84–86.
2. English abstract: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260188152;
3. In Russian:

   Горюнова С.В, Остроумов С.А: Воздействие анионного детергента на зеленую протококковую водоросль и проростки некоторых покрытосеменных растений. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265509244.

   Google Scholar
4. 2.
   Danilov, V.S., Yudina, T.P., and Sorokina, E.V., Extending the possibilities of a luminescent bacteria test for analyzing the toxicity of chemical compounds, Vestn. Orenb. Gos. Univ., 2007, no. 75, pp. 102–104.Google Scholar
5. 3.
   Deryabin, D.G., Bakterial’naya biolyuminestsentsiya: fundamental’nye i prikladnye aspekty (Bacterial Bioluminescence: Fundamental and Applied Aspects), Moscow: Nauka, 2009.Google Scholar
6. 4.
   Markina, Zh.V., Effects of sodium dodecyl sulfate on the growth dynamics and physiological state of the microalga Dunaliella salina (Chlorophyta), Russ. J. Mar. Biol., 2010, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 191–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. 5.
   Melekhova, O.P., Sarapul’tseva, E.I., Evseeva, T.I., et al., Biologicheskii kontrol’ okruzhayushchei sredy. Bioindikatsiya i biotestirovanie (Biological Control of the Environment: Bioindication and Biological Testing), Moscow: Akademiya, 2010.  Full list of co-authors of this book: O.P.Melehova, EI Sarapultseva, T.I.Evseeva, V.M.Glazer, S.A.Geraskin, Yu.K.Doronin, A.A.Kitashova, A.V.Kitashov, Yu.P.Kozlov, I.A.Kondrateva, G.V.Kossova, S.V.Kotelevtsev, D.N.Matorin, S.A.Ostroumov, S.I.Pogosyan, A.V.Smurov, G.N.Solovyh, A.L.Stepanov, N. A.Tushmalova, L.V.Tsatsenko.
8. 
   
9. Annotation: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311743688;
   Google Scholar
10. 6.
    FR 1.39.2007.03223: Metodika opredeleniya toksichnosti vod, vodnykh vytyazhek iz pochv, osadkov stochnykh vod i otkhodov po izmeneniyu urovnya fluorestsentsii khlorofilla i chislennosti kletok vodoroslei (Method for Determination of Toxicity of Water, Water Extracts from Soils, Sewage Sludge, and Wastes by the Change in the Chlorophyll Fluorescence Level and the Number of Algal Cells), Moscow: Akvaros, 2007.
11. 7.
    PND FT14.1:2:3:4.11-04; 16.1:2.3:3.8-04: Metodika opredeleniya toksichnosti vody i vodnykh vytyazhek iz pochv, osadkov stochnykh vod i otkhodov po izmeneniyu intensivnosti bakterial’noi biolyuminestsentsii test-sistemoi “Ekolyum” (Method for Determination of Toxicity of Water, Water Extracts from Soils, Sewage Sludge, and Wastes by the Change in the Chlorophyll Fluorescence using the Ecolum Test System), Moscow: NERA-S, 2005.
12. 8.
    FR 1.39.2007.03222: Metodika opredeleniya toksichnosti vody i vodnykh vytyazhek iz pochv, osadkov stochnykh vod, otkhodov po smertnosti i izmeneniyu plodovitosti dafnii (Method for Determination of Toxicity of Water, Water Extracts from Soils, Sewage Sludge, and Wastes by the Mortality and Change in Fertility of Daphnia), Moscow: Akvaros, 2007.
13. 9.
    FR. 1.39.2006.02506, PNDF 14.1:2:3.13-06 16.1:2.3:3.10- 06: Metodika opredeleniya toksichnosti otkhodov, pochv, osadkov stochnykh, poverkhnostnykh i gruntovykh vod metodom blokirovaniya s ispol’zovaniem ravnoresnichnykh infuzorii (Paramecium caudatum Ehrenberg) (Method for determination of toxicity of wastes, soils, and sludge of sewage, surface, and ground waters by the blocking technique using holotrich ciliates (Paramecium caudatum Ehrenberg)), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 2006.
14. 10.
    Ostroumov, S.A., Biologicheskie effekty pri vozdeistvii poverkhnostno-aktivnykh veshchestv na organizm (Biological Effects of Surfactants on the Organism), Moscow: MAKS-Press, 2001.  [Библиографическая ссылка на русском языке: Остроумов С.А. Биологические эффекты при воздействии поверхностно-активных веществ на организмы. М.: МАКС-Пресс. 2001.  334 с.  ISBN 5-317-00323-7]. 
15. Аннотация на русском языке: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266193942;
    Google Scholar
16. 11.
    Ostroumov, S.A., The effect of synthetic surfactants on the hydrobiological mechanisms of water self-purification, Water Resour., 2004, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 502–510.  [Полный текст русскоязычной статьи бесплатно:
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295546994.
    Остроумов С.А. Влияние синтетических поверхностно-активных веществ на
    гидробиологические механизмы самоочищения водной среды // Водные ресурсы 2004, т. 31. №
    5. С. 546 – 555].
17. Полный текст англоязычной статьи / Full text free: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227176754;
    CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. 12.
    Prisnyi, A.V., Volynkin, Yu.L., and Kampos, N.N., Mechanisms of resistance of ciliates to chemical damage and overcoming them using lethal concentrations of synthetic surfactants, Nauch. Ved., 2009, no. 11 (66), pp. 45–54.Google Scholar
19. 13.
    Kudryasheva, N., Vetrova, T., Kuznetsov, A., et al., Bioluminescence assays: effects of guinones and phenols, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety, 2002, vol. 53, pp. 221–225.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
20. 14.
    Lewis, P.A., Differences in acute toxicity test results of three reference toxicants on daphnia at two temperatures, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 1991, vol. 10, pp. 1351–1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. 15.
    Villegas-Navarro, A., The heart of Daphnia magna: effects of four cardioactive drugs, Comp. Biochem. Physiol., 2003, vol. 136, no. 2, pp. 127–134.Google Scholar

**