Facts versus Conclusions/Inferences/Opinions
ubiety's post: http://inteldinarchronicles.blogspot.ca/2017/01/response-to-one-of-light-by-ubiety-12317.html
Ubiety, let me criticize your articles/posts in a few paragraphs.
Partial quote regarding Yosef: "You have self-deluded that your factless version of reality..." - were you there when this happened, to observe it, the moment that Yosef (apparently) became self-deluded? No, you concluded deluded! And just what is his "version of reality" as you term it - please tell me, if you are able to do so, so I may determine whether it is in fact also factless (your word), from my independent assessment of what are facts.
You continue to confuse facts with opinions, conclusions and/or inferences throughout your posts - so when you use the word factless, I am really unsure of what you actually mean, fact or opinion. This confusion tends, after several posts of yours, to cause me to discount what you say before I even read your posts. [I and others have written posts here on the subject of discernment.]
Quote: ~ The "exchange centers" are a sham. ~ >> this is an assertion which is apparently leveled at Yosef. My knowledge of the existence of these came from multiple unrelated sources. And, I clearly have no way of verifying this is fact, just as you have no way of verifying that it is false! Your statements are just opinions.
Clearly, you don't know what you don't know. This is true for everyone. And since, by your own admission, you know nothing about the exchange centres, you actually cannot know if they exist or not! Again, it's your opinion.
Quote: "To a lesser degree, you are also a part of the problem with Dinarland." - I believe here you have described yourself accurately. But don't ask/trust me, ask Dinarland. That should bring you the attention you crave (note: opinion is deliberately stated here as though it is fact). Please interpret the previous sentence as a fact. While it is clearly an opinion (or conclusion or inference or...), I take liberty using the manner in which you express yourself in your posts.
Now let's talk about the elephant in the room >> you are opinionated. You write extremely well, but only to express your opinions - which you confuse with facts and which are NOT facts. Are you really, as you seem to call the members of Dinarland, a liar, or just stupid? Do you actually have a purpose to your writing? And is it to raise up the dead from among us, or merely to point out how inferior/stupid all members of Dinarland are? Please explain to me what you see your role as here - curmugeon?
Quote: "yosef" has no "intel" >> corresponds to: "ubiety" has no "facts" (just opinions)
ubiety, you will be useful to Dinarland and welcomed here when you bring us some intel/facts. Opinions are still very useful when not masquerading as facts. You criticized Yosef. Where is your intel? Oh, you only have opinions? Sorry... You are not doing anyone a favour by your behaviour, nor any service to Dinarland.
Jimbabwe
[PS - being a Canuck, I use Canadian spellings, so no jingoism please, lol!!!]