Response to "blueray" by SPA - 1.24.17
You start your diatribe with pseudo kindness, then attack with
irrelevancies : You said ~ " Perhaps you feel that you should be
allowed to agenda-set, gate-keep and determine who should
and shouldn't be allowed to post here. I don't need your permission. "
Paleese ! Patrick the owner determines what is posted. If you were
trying to spank me or make a point, what you really did was expose
your fragile ego. Shallow, presumptive point ~ GRADE D minus.
Your juvenile rendition of ' the rules ' is also irrelevant. I can frigging
read. Patrick changes the rules at his pleasure, which he did recently,
allowing ingrates & smart asses like you & me to post our nonsense.
Wandering, pointless rendering ~ GRADE D+.
You said " Who is we? " WE is more than one person - Websters.
Pathetic attempt to sound on point & clever. ~ Grade D.
You said " The things you talk about go over the top of my head. "
Boy is that ever clear ! Accurate, revealing admission ~ GRADE A+
You said " The stuff you have put forth sounds like victimhood to me. "
Besides the grammatical inaccuracy, you are wrong. I'm not sure how
I could be a 'victim' if I still have my currency. The last time I was
victimized was 52 years ago when Mark stole my police whistle.
Conclusion : Psychology is clearly not your forte. ~ GRADE F.
Honestly, I just couldn't read any more of your rambling. More
words, ergo volume, doesn't make your point any more poignant.
Take away the potential for FINANCIAL gain & IN MY OPINION
many of these sites & those that visit would disappear, hence,
my focus on FINANCIAL. We, IN MY OPINION, attempt to find
accurate INFORMATION about this event, hence, the attempt to
point out liars. And those claiming to be 'gods.' { snicker }.
I'm happy to see more of us " negative " people calling out
proven liars & daring to question authority. This is my raison d'être
for being here . Faith & belief are sorry substitutes for evidence.
I hope my response didn't ' go over the top of your head.'
blueray