Abstract, refs: Toxicity of gold nanoparticles for plants in experimental aquatic system; Authors: S. A. Ostroumov, V. A. Poklonov, S. V. Kotelevtsev, S. N. Orlov,

Abstract, refs:
Toxicity of gold nanoparticles for plants in experimental aquatic system;
Authors: 
S. A. Ostroumov,
V. A. Poklonov,
S. V. Kotelevtsev,
S. N. Orlov, 

Moscow University Biological Sciences Bulletin, July 2014, Volume 69, Issue 3, pp 108–112; 

http://5bio5.blogspot.com/2017/01/abstract-refs-toxicity-of-gold.html

 Toxicity of gold nanoparticles for plants in experimental aquatic system;

• Authors
• Authors and affiliations

• S. A. OstroumovEmail author
• V. A. Poklonov
• S. V. Kotelevtsev
• S. N. Orlov

1. 1.

Ecology

First Online: 

24 September 2014

DOI: 10.3103/S0096392514030080

Cite this article as:

Ostroumov, S.A., Poklonov, V.A., Kotelevtsev, S.V. et al. Moscow Univ. Biol.Sci. Bull. (2014) 69: 108. doi:10.3103/S0096392514030080

• 100Shares
 
• 207Downloads

Abstract

Increased production and use of nanomaterials can lead to new types of pollution of the environment, including aquatic ecosystems. Pollution of the aqueous environment with nanoparticles can be a new type of pollution of the environment. This requires a more detailed study of the biological effects during exposure of nanoparticles on aquatic organisms. The interactions of gold nanoparticles (Au) with aquatic macrophytes Ceratophyllum demersum have been studied. Aquatic microcosms with these plants were used. Gold nanoparticles (Au) were added to the aqueous medium of C. demersum macrophyte containing microcosms. The state of the plants was then analyzed. Phytotoxicity of Au nanoparticles for aquatic macrophytes was shown for the first time. A new method of phytotoxicity detection was suggested and successfully approved. Phytotoxicity at a concentration of Au (in the form of nanoparticles) of 6 × 10−6 M-1.8 × 10−5 M was shown.

Keywords

hydrobiontsaquatic microcosmsmacrophytesnanoparticlesAuCeratophyllum demersum

Original Russian Text © S.A. Ostroumov, V.A. Poklonov, S.V. Kotelevtsev, S.N. Orlov, 2014, published in Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Biologiya, 2014, No. 3, pp. 19–23.

References

1. 1.
   Nagajyoti, P.C., Lee, K.D., and Sreekanth, T.V.M., Heavy metals, occurrence and toxicity for plants: a review, Environ. Chem. Lett., 2010, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. 2.
   Ermakov, V.V. and Tyutikov, S.F., Geokhimicheskaya ekologiya zhivotnykh (Geochemical Ecology of Animals), Moscow: Nauka, 2008.Google Scholar
3. 3.
   Ostroumov, S.A., Triton X-100, Toxicol. Rev., 1999, no. 4, p. 41.Google Scholar
4. 4.
   Ostroumov, S.A., Cadmium sulphate: effect on mussels, Toxicol. Rev., 2004, no. 6, pp. 36–37.Google Scholar
5. 5.
   Ostroumov, S.A., Potassium fluotitanate (impact on water filtration mussels Mytilus galloprovincialis), Toxicol. Rev., 2007, no. 3, pp. 39–40.Google Scholar
6. 6.
   Ostroumov, S.A. and Solomonova, E.A., Synthetic detergent “aist-universal:” impact on Fontinalis antipyretica Hedw, Toxicol. Rev., 2007, no. 1, pp. 40–41.Google Scholar
7. 7.
   Ostroymov, S.A. and Solomonva, E.A., Synthetic detergent “aist-universal:” effects on seed germination and seedling elongation of buckwheat Fagopyrum esculentum, Toxicol. Rev., 2007, no. 5, pp. 42–43.Google Scholar
8. 8.
   Ostroumov, S.A. and Solomonva, E.A., Investigation of the interaction of sodium dodecyl sulfate with water macrophytes under experimental conditions, Toxicol. Rev., 2008, no. 4, pp. 21–26.Google Scholar
9. 9.
   Solomonova, E.A. and Ostroumov, S.A., Effects of sodium dodecyl sulfate on the biomass of macrophytes Najas guadelupensis L., Toxicol. Rev., 2009, no. 2, pp. 32–35.Google Scholar
10. 10.
    Strizhko, V.S. and Meretukov, M.A., Gold, in Khimicheskaya entsiklopediya (Chemical Encyclopedia), Moscow: Sov. Entsikloped., 1990, vol. 2, pp. 334–338.Google Scholar
11. 11.
    Boisselier, E. and Astruc, D., Gold nanoparticles in nanomedicine: preparations, imaging, diagnostics, therapies and toxicity, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1759–1782.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. 12.
    Dobrovol’skii, G.V., On the 80th anniversary of the publication of the book by V.I. Vernadsky “Biosphere.” Development of some important sections of the teachings about biosphere, Ekol. Khim., 2007, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 135–143.Google Scholar
13. 13.
    Moiseenko, T.I., Vodnaya ekotoksikologiya: teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty (Aquatic Ecotoxicology: Theoretical and Applied Aspects), Moscow: Nauka, 2009.Google Scholar
14. 14.
    Moiseenko, T.I. and Gashkina, N.A., Microelements in land surface waters and peculiarities of their migration, Dokl. Earth Sci., 2005, vol. 405, no. 9, pp. 1327–1332.Google Scholar
15. 15.
    Ermakov, V.V., About the book “Aquatic Organisms in Water Self-Purification and Biogenic Migration of Elements,” Water: Chem. Ecol., 2009, no. 8, pp. 25–29.Google Scholar
16. 16.
    Rand, G., Fundamentals of Aquatic Toxicology, Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis, 1995.Google Scholar
17. 17.
    Ostroumov, S.A., Aquatic Organisms in Water Self-Purification and Biogenic Migration of Elements, Moscow: MAKS Press, 2008.Google Scholar
18. 18.
    Chemical and biotic interactions. Bibliographic information. http://www.scribd.com/doc/62341906/
19. 19.
    Abakumov, V.A., New in the study of modern problems environmental science and ecology, including research on water ecosystems and organisms, Achiev. Life, 2012, no. 5, pp. 121–126.Google Scholar
20. 20.
    Abakumov, V.A., A review of some achievements in environmental sciences, general ecology and aquatic ecology: functioning of ecosystems and environmental toxicology, Ecol. Studies Hazards Solutions, 2013, vol. 18, pp. 7–15.Google Scholar
21. 21.
    Ermakov, V.V. and Gorshkova, O.M., Towards a new ecology and environmental science. (Review, bibliography of selected papers and books), Ecol. Studies Hazards Solutions, 2013, vol. 18, pp. 29–46.Google Scholar
22. 22.
    Asharani, P.V., Lianwu, Y., Gong, Z., and Valiyaveettil, S., Comparison of the toxicity of silver, gold and platinum nanoparticles in developing zebrafish embryos, Nanotoxicology, 2011, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 43–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. 23.
    Taylor, U.A., Barchanski, W., Garrels, S., Klein, W., Kues, S., and Barcikowski, D.R., Toxicity of gold nanoparticles on somatic and reproductive cells, Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 2012, vol. 733, pp. 125–133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. 24.
    Johnson, M.E., Ostroumov, S.A., Tyson, J.F., and Xing, B., Study of the interactions between Elodea canadensis and CuO nanoparticles, Russ. J. General Chem., 2011, vol. 81, no. 13, pp. 2688–2693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. 25.
    Ostroumov, S.A. and Kotevtsev, S.V., Toxicology of nanomaterials and environment, Ecologica, 2011, vol. 18, no. 61, pp. 3–10.Google Scholar
26. 26.
    Ostroumov, S.A., Biological Effects of Surfactants, Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis, 2006.Google Scholar
27. 27.
    Ostroumov, S.A. and Trety’yakova, A.N., Effect of environmental pollution with a cationic surface active substance on algae and Fagopyrum esculentum sprouts, Soviet J. Ecol., 1990, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 79–81.Google Scholar
28. 28.
    Ostroumov, S.A. and Semykina, N.A., Reaction of Fagopyrum esculentum Moench to pollution of aqueous medium with polymeric surfactants, Russ. J. Ecol., 1993, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 386–390.Google Scholar
29. 29.
    Ostroumov, S.A. and Maksimov, V.N., Bioassay of surfactants based on the disruption of seedling attachment to the substrate and rhizoderm root hair formation, Biol. Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR, 1992, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 383–386.Google Scholar
30. 30.
    Solomonova, E.A. and Ostroumov, S.A., Tolerance of an aquatic macrophyte Potamogeton crispus L. to sodium dodecyl sulphate, Moscow Univ. Biol. Sci. Bull., 2007, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 176–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. 31.
    Ostroumov, S.A. and Khoroshilov, V.S., Biological activity of waters polluted with a liquid surfactant-containing detergent, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Biol., 1992, no. 3, pp. 452–458.Google Scholar
32. 32.
    Poklonov, V.A., Kotelvtsev, S.A., Shestakova, T.V., Sheleykovsky, V.L., and Ostroumov, S.A., The study of phytoremediation potential of aquatic plants Lilaeopsis brasiliensis and Utricularia gibba, Water: Chem. Ecol., 2012, no. 5, pp. 66–69.Google Scholar
33. 33.
    Ostroumov, S.A. and Xing, B., Effects of three types of metal oxide nanoparticles (TiO2, CuO, Al2O3) on the seedlings of the higher plant Lens culinaris, Ecologica, 2012, vol. 19, no. 65, pp. 10–14.Google Scholar
34. 34.
    Ladislas, S., El-Mufleh, A., Herente, C., Chazarenc, F., Andres, Y., and Bechet, B., Potential of aquatic macrophytes as bioindicators of heavy metal pollution in urban stormwater runoff, Water Air Soil Pollut., 2012, vol. 223, no. 2, pp. 877–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35. 35.
    Singh, D., Tiwari, A., and Gupta, R., Phytoremediation of lead from wastewater using aquatic plants, J. Agr. Technol., 2012, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
36. 36.
    Wong, S.W., Leung, K.M., and Djurisic, A.B., A comprehensive review on the aquatic toxicity of engineered nanomaterials, Rev. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 2012, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. 37.
    Mohmood, I., Lopes, C.B., Lopes, I., Ahmad, I., Duarte, A.C., and Pereira, E., Nanoscale materials and their use in water contaminants removal—a review, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2013, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1239–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38. 38.
    Ostroumov, S.A., Problems of assessment of biological activity of xenobiotics, Moscow Univ. Biol. Sci. Bull., 1990, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 26–32.Google Scholar
39. 39.
    Ostroumov, S.A. and Wasternack, K., Response of photo-organotrophously growing green flagellates to water pollution by the detergent preparation “kristall,” Moscow Univ. Biol. Sci. Bull., 1991, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 66–67.Google Scholar