Calais total jungle eviction could start 17 October, a call to action from the Zad‏

Full article with links here (English only):

http://rabble.org.uk/calais-total-jungle-eviction-may-begin-on-17-october-a-call-to-action-from-the-zad/


The French State has been spreading word that it will evict the whole of 
the Calais Jungle, meaning the homes of 10,000 people, by “the end of 
October”. The latest rumour is that the attack will begin on 17 October 
and will feature a new weapon: blinding laser cannons developed for use 
against Somali pirates, now to be used for the first time against 
Africans and other migrants on European soil.**

Other talk is that the eviction will take just “three days”, and that 
not only the self-built jungle but also the official Jules Ferry day 
centre and maybe even the state-built Container Camp will go. Comrades 
from the ZAD (occupied zone of resistance to the airport project in 
Notre Dame des Landes) also believe that their own planned eviction may 
be delayed so that the state can first throw all its forces at Calais.

The charitable Associations, in a typical statement, have said that they 
will support the mass destruction, but ask for humanitarian assurances 
that displaced people will be given accommodation elsewhere in France, 
and that their breadwinner the Jules Ferry day centre can stay.

French riot police have been evicting camps in Calais, official and 
unofficial, at least since the closure of the Red Cross run Sangatte 
centre in 2002. That camp, like the Pashtun Jungle cleared in September 
2009, housed somewhere under 2,000 people. Clearing the present jungle 
of 10,000 people is an operation of another scale altogether. Even with 
laser cannons, it’s hard to see how they could really manage it in three 
days.

Unless they first get the charities to persuade everyone to leave 
“voluntarily”. Or unless they are prepared to use violence on a new 
level, that is, to come in shooting to maim and kill.

The eviction of the southern half of the Jungle earlier this year took 
several weeks. And that time the state and its charity helpers had a 
simple ploy: they told people they would be safe if they moved into the 
container camp, or just a couple of hundred metres away onto the North 
Zone. A few hundred people still refused, and some occupied rooftops, 
fought back with whatever came to hand, or went on hunger strike. But 
the majority resignedly shuffled their belongings across.

This time it seems there will be no such option. The state says that it 
wants to offer places for all in “reception centres” across France. But 
currently it has nowhere near 10,000 such places, and no one knows how 
it plans to create them in a couple of weeks. Even supposing it does, 
many people are likely to refuse to get on a coach to some unannounced 
destination which might be a camp hundreds of miles away, or might be a 
detention prison waiting for a deportation flight. (Last week a leaked 
memo revealed that the EU is pushing a new mass deportation deal with 
Afghanistan, threatening to cut aid unless the Afghan government accepts 
80,000 people flown back.)

So many doubts, many questions. But one thing for sure: once again, the 
big attack is coming. The latest blow on top of the every day misery, 
squalor, disease and continual police violence of the jungle.

We repost below a statement from the resistance at the ZAD, calling for 
active solidarity now with the Calais Jungle. Under the shadow of 
massive state attack, there is a glimmer of light here. The fact that 
the French state is unable to attack both camps at once reminds us that 
its force, however great, is not total. It is likely that CRS and 
Gendarmes Mobiles will be withdrawn from across France for the attack on 
Calais. This is just the moment for acts of solidarity and rebellion to 
spread across the country.

The ZAD call also highlights the company Vinci. This company is both the 
protagonist of the airport project there, and the state’s main corporate 
accomplice in the Calais evictions: workers from its subsidiary Sogea 
were the ones tearing down homes in the Jungle south zone as the 
gendarmes and CRS cleared the people. These are just two examples. Vinci 
is the go-to private sector partner of the French state whenever it 
needs a road or airport bulldozing through someone’s home or some 
remnant of forest. Vinci is also active internationally, including in 
the UK, where it also operates under the name Taylor Woodrow, and is one 
of the big construction firms known for blacklisting troublesome 
workers.

(** This story was reported in the latest edition of Le Canard Enchaîné, 
a bit like the French equivalent of UK’s Private Eye, which often has 
“scoops”.)
***
Neither here nor in Calais – Not keeping silence

(French version here)

The word has come from certain medias that the government’s priority 
would not be to evict the zad in october, but to « evacuate the Calais 
jungle ». The police forces being unable to handle both operations at 
once. The movement against the airport and the world it stands for 
cannot remain silent in the face of this cynical game of leaving one 
eviction for later so that the other can be carried out.

We are calling out for solidarity and for the organization of actions 
now and for the coming weeks against the french state, Vinci, and the 
others that will take part in the eviction of the « jungle » in Calais 
and the ZAD of NDDL.. These two struggles are concrete fights against 
the racist and imperialist policies in europe, and the war it wages 
against « unwanted » people.

Last March, the people who had participated in a hunger strike in 2012 
against the airport of Notre-Dame-des-Landes came to Calais to meet 9 
refugees ready to die to stop the eviction of the south part of the « 
jungle ». These persons were on hungerstrike to protest against the 
order to evict more than 3000 people from the only home, shelter, wooden 
cabin, or tarpoline roof that they had. This destruction was carried out 
by SOGEA, sub-company of VINCI.

For the farmers the of Notre-Dame-des-Landes the destruction of what 
made their living amounted to question their way of life. In the « 
jungle » the houses, restaurants, grocery shops that have been built are 
steps to make life possible no matter what, while waiting « to be able 
to start really living ». If we must share solidarity with the those who 
live there, it is in part because their existence and perspectives are 
threatened by a society of control and a police state. But also because, 
like in the zad, the « jungle » has made it possible to have a space for 
organization, autonomy, encounters and solidarity. And like in 
Notre-Dame-des-Landes, the state has little regards for individuals 
determined to put their own lives at stake.

Today, in October 2016, the state announces the eviction of what remains 
of the « jungle », 10 000 persons are threatened. The government would 
like to make believe that this eviction is a humanitarian operation, 
just like during the destruction of the south part of the slum last 
march. The hypocricy of
this speech is unacceptable in regards to the violence of the planned 
destruction of the homes of people, and the eagerness to control those 
in transit in Calais.

The « jungle » is part of a repressive construction created to hold off, 
to check, to control, and to deport the migrant population, reminding 
dark times in occidental history. Unseen and uncared for. Everyone where 
they « belong ». The stench of racism is disgusting. The rise of the 
racist and nationalist ideologies thoughout europe is no different to 
what we encounter in calais, and our solidarity must also include a 
struggle against the rise of a fascist society. The state is able to 
carry on its systematic repression of migrants in calais and elsewhere 
because of our implicit support, thanks to our silence.

What happens in Calais is not an isolated phenomenon, or an exception. 
The same logic spreads in france and in europe, made of repression and 
management of populations, of war against «unwanted» people, those who 
challenge the state by their way of life. We think that the management 
of the territory and its infrastructures is of the same nature as that 
of the control of populations. The organization of the repression, and 
the process of evictions and isolation of the « unwanted » will not 
defeat our drive to
chose, to make attempts, to build our own lives.

From Notre-Dame-des-Landes we reassert our determination to fight 
together against these common enemies.