Anarchistic update news all over the world - 14 October 2016

Today's Topics:

   

1.  France, Alternative Libertaire AL - unionism, "There is
      still fighting! "Constituent meeting on 15 October in Paris (fr,
      it, pt) [machine translation] (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
   

2.  anarkismo.net: "Superintendent Officer Mthembu" - Spoken
      word poetry against police brutality Inspired by the Events of
      28th September 2016 - Police Shooting on RU students by Leroy
      Maisiri - Zabalaza Anarchist Communist Front - ZACF
      (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
   

3.  Greece, "Black and Red" APO: Information and photos of
      yesterday's march against torture minors A.T. Omonia and police
      violence. (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
   

4.  France, Alternative Libertaire AL - international, Colombia:
      a libertarian perspective on the "no" to the peace agreement (fr,
      it, pt) [machine translation] (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
   

5.  Greece, Collective response to anti-authoritarian: leftist
      libel against squatters ceiling for immigrants and refugees from
      Antiauthoritarian Movement Larissa (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
   

6.  Czech anarchist Federation: Ceština, Rojava - Kurds in the
      struggle for freedom and against ISIS [machine translation]
      (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
   

7.  Poland, October 15 - mobilization against CETA and TTIP! -
      Inicjatywa Pracownicza (IP, Workers' Initiative) [machine
      translation] (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
  

 8.  France, Alternative Libertaire AL - nternational, Colombia:
      a libertarian analysis of the cease-fire with the FARC (fr, it,
      pt) [machine translation] (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1



Exceed the initial form of the call "on all blocks" towards an inter-network fight? That 
is the issue that binds the constituent meeting held in Paris this mid-October, entitled 
"It is still fighting! ". ---- We are trade unionists affilié.es to different 
organizations (CGT, Solidaires, CNT-SW CNT, FSU, FO, LAB, Peasant Confederation ...). 
Together we retrouvé.es in the call "It blocks all! " . ---- Since March, we have brought 
the proposals in meetings, in our structures, with our friends, our colleagues. We have 
helped mobilize broad and determined for the withdrawal of the law "work", and to 
popularize the aim of blocking the economy. We are still fighting for the repeal of this law.

So far we have everyone, and whatever our union, had difficulties to anchor the strike in 
our professional sectors, to expand, to spend the necessary extension and generalization 
of the strike. We continue to believe that this is a decisive instrument to build a 
balance of power able to repel the attacks of the state and employers. We continue to 
believe that trade union structures must continue to reflect on the barriers to action and 
commitment of salarié.es well as union practices that perpetuate them.

PARIS
Saturday, October 15, 2016, from 14h to 17h
Labour Exchange Paris, Eugène Varlin room

Event "There is still fighting! "On social networks

the collective page "It blocks all! "On social networks

The digital version on appeal

Today we propose to overcome the form call of "It blocks all! ". This is the balance that 
was fired in July after four months of fighting. The concrete implementation of the call 
are requested, so one could imagine "the emergence of a permanent network of control 
unionists, supported on real local collectives, whose form as the name would find but 
would aim to exceed form "call" to be able to concrete initiatives and field. (...) A 
network of collective struggle unionists could (...) organize meetings, regional and 
national trainings, campaigns themselves ... ".

We therefore call, broadly, any and all trade unionists who think that such a network or 
group would be useful to build, now, with us.

Such a tool would not replace our respective organizations: we are friendly and respectful 
federalism of our organizations, rhythms and democratic structures of our time. Simply, we 
believe conduct debates, activities, open and plural, would help to reinvigorate the 
struggle unionism in all its diversity. This unit Inter win to incarnate from the base: 
this is what we propose to do exist.

For this, we organize Saturday, October 15, at the Labour Exchange Paris, Varlin room, 
first constitutive meeting of this common tool. See you there, and many many, always fighting!

The animation Collective Call "is blocking everything! "

(Grouping militant.es CGT, CNT-SO, FSU, Solidaires ...)

1 September 2016

http://www.alternativelibertaire.org/?On-se-bat-toujours-reunion

------------------------------

Message: 2



"Superintendent Officer Mthembu" ---- If our pain was turned into an art museum the most 
popular exhibit would showcase portraits of the South African Police Service with our 
bodies on the floor as their footstools. Our silenced screams chock up the airways in our 
throats, our tracheas burst out and with both hands we grab the artery veins in an attempt 
to contain the bleeding, trying to redirect this blood, this life back into the cause and 
yes, bang, bang, bang; you keep shooting and yes bang, bang, bang, we keep running. ---- 
But please first allow me to start this poetic prose in Joza extension 7, the peripheral 
of the township itself almost excommunicated from the centre of Grahamstown. Somewhere 
unclearly mapped by angry ground stones who share their space with the kind of dust that 
does not easily settle well on the road, is what looks like an afterthought of an RDP 
house. In it is Superintendent Officer Mthembu. A child of the working class. Mthembu on 
his tea breaks always jokes about how he wanted to be a lawyer, most of his stories start 
with the words "and during the apartheid..." he would recall those memories so well, 
remembering quite clearly all the fights, the protests, the revolutionary climate that 
engrossed South Africa. His stories would also always end with "...if only I could afford 
the fees in '94, I would have been a qualified lawyer like Madiba".

You would think that would be the cue for disappointment to enter the space, to remind him 
that he was just another causality of a system that did not care for his dreams, but like 
a comma with no manners, his smile interrupts his thought process joining his past 
failures together with the apple of his eye, his only beloved daughter Siphokazi, a final 
year LLB student who carries her dreams in the same back pack loaded with her father's 
dreams and NSFAS loans.

On Wednesday the 28th of September 2016, Siphokazi has all the candles lit in their home, 
it's still early not even dawn is aware of how the day will unfold. 4 am sharp the good 
officer jumps to attention, not waiting for the hot water that doesn't exist; he tidies 
himself up and rushes to report in for duty. Siphokazi awaits the slow pace sun rise to 
commence before she can decide it's a safe time to start the 10 kilometer walk to campus, 
she spent the entire night researching on interdicts, and the right to free education.

It's nearly been two weeks since the events of 28th September she tells me, she says they 
ran in all kinds of direction that day, shocked at how something so small could hurt so 
much. The images rock her mind so much I feel like I am extracting a physical memory as it 
tears through her forehead and fills the room.

She takes me back to the lawns within campus, she points to the Drostdy lawn walls with 
such disappointment in their in ability to shield the students. On my right is a student I 
have never met before rolling on the ground as if he is on fire only trying to locate 
where the pain is coming from. On my left 9 students run into each other in chaotic 
harmony, stun grenades go off again and again. I feel anger and fear simultaneously race 
up to my temple. The corner of my eye catches two female students attempting to run in the 
chaos, both their hands find each other; they clatch on to each other as two lovers would 
in a dark tunnel, but the grip tightens, the hand holding generates sweat that turns into 
glue "don't let go!" they both shout. I reach out my hand I want to tell them it's all 
over now, that this is just a memory, that in this moment right now we are all in 
Siphokazi's memory.

Truth is the police have been slaughtering generations long before we even started looking 
for our voices. That on most days standing on campus corners makes us feel like an 
endangered species, that at any point we can be left looking like red confetti splatted on 
a concrete sidewalk. That our voices sound unhinged, almost like the voices from the 
primary and secondary high school kids whose dreams are lynched on a daily basis. Dreams 
executed Monday to Friday by the failing education system. Such that by high school all we 
have is a large spectacle of hangings that occur at least twice a year -called exams.

There is nothing to examine if you cannot account for the massive unlearning that needs to 
occur instead all it is - is an execution. Bang, Bang, Bang! - shooting continues. The 
memory of September 28th feels like the first time the death of a close family member 
wraps itself around you.

All of a sudden I remember the most profound metaphysic question, "if a black body unarmed
is shot by the police in broad day light, in front of everyone, does it make a sound". 
Does it matter? Did it really happen? Working class struggle is not just a matter of 
theory; police brutality is absolute despite your level of awareness. It's not about 
keeping the streets safe anymore; it's about keeping them empty.

They make bullets different these days, these new bullets do not go in and out, they get 
absorbed in the body - same function as a tampon to suck and pull in all life. There is 
after all some reason why these bullets seem to fall in love with melanin given the way 
they pursue us, some reason why shotgun shells never run out for the working class. I 
guess it's pretty hard to fight back when all you have are your fists and unhappiness.

Its September the 28th 8pm, Superintendent Officer Mthembu arrives home, extremely 
exhausted, he has scratch marks he cannot explain, probably another protestor resisting 
arrest. He is greeted by the emptiness of the one bedroomed house. According to memory by 
now Siphokazi would have long been home and made him something to eat. He grabs his cell 
phone only noticing now that he hasn't paid much attention to it all day. 19 missed calls 
from his daughter, 23 missed calls from a private number, 10 text messages all of them 
looking like an SOS, one reads - "hie sir your daughter was shot by the police today, 
police opened fire on us with rubber bullets unfortunately Siphokazi was in the front she 
got hit in the throat. She said if she doesn't make it - it's important you know she was 
fighting for free education for the both of you.

Related Link: http://Zabalaza.net

http://www.anarkismo.net/article/29677

------------------------------

Message: 3




The course was opened to the upper center, passed from A.T. Upper City and made a stop, 
shouting slogans. Since the beginning of our platoons path followed nearby. Fonachtikan 
slogans against the police, the state and capitalism and defending immigrants and our 
structures. It is clear that the Left government not uct only wants to silence any 
resistance there and pass measures nor the right one would imagine, but tries to suppress 
any kind of reaction in the social sphere, as was done with the auctions where we were 
antimetotoi with MAT of the left and the Oraiokastro where MAT contributed to what the 
fascists can not do and will never allow. We have to say that we do not remain indifferent 
and silent, will leave no home in the hands of bankers, no child tormented in A.T., no 
fascist warding refugee children from schools and any captured our partner in state hands.

COMMON locals GAMES AND IMMIGRANTS FOR LIFE AND DIGNITY.
WE LIVE TOGETHER, WORK TOGETHER, local NAZI bend IMMIGRANTS

Collegiality for social anarchism "Black and Red", a member of the APO

https://maurokokkino1936.wordpress.com/2016/10/09/

------------------------------

Message: 4



The landmark agreement on the end of the civil war, spent between Bogota and the FARC 
guerrillas, is threatened by the victory of the "no" in the referendum that was to endorse 
the peace agreement. Comment and analysis of the libertarian group Vía Libre, live from 
Colombia. ---- At the October 2 referendum, which was voted on the approval of the Final 
Agreement by the end of the armed conflict signed between the government of Juan Manuel 
Santos and the insurrection of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia - People's Army 
(FARC -EP)[1], the No won unexpectedly and just. It is a political earthquake. ---- 53 
According to the bulletin of the National Registry of Civil Status, with 99.98% of the 
audited polling stations, the choice of No won with a score of 50.21%, or 6,431,376 votes, 
by the narrow margin 0.45% or 53,894 votes, facing the Yes option were 49.78% of votes is 
6,377,482. According to the same source, during the same vote 86,243 blank votes and 
170,946 invalid votes were recorded, in a context of low participation of 13,064,973 
votant.es on a census of 34,899,945, or 37.43% of the total[2].

Faced with this panorama, the Libertario Grupo Vía Libre offers, in line with its 
collective position of critical support to the peace process[3], some elements that could 
help in the analysis of the current political moment, as the causes of the happened on 
possible future scenarios.

Read: libertarian group Via Libre, "Colombia: a libertarian analysis of the cease-fire 
with the FARC"

The defeat of the Yes

First, it is clear that this result is a major political defeat of the heterogeneous 
alliance that supported the Yes. The weakened and worn government of Juan Manuel Santos, 
with a favorable image below the 30% in some surveys[4]with fragile political bases, and 
unable to manage without economic adjustment deceleration of the national economy, did not 
have the political strength to hold the same number of voters and voters who have ratified 
its success in the second round of the presidential elections of 2014, when a pragmatic 
alliance in his favor had allowed his re-election with 7,836,887 votes, representing 
1,459,405 vote of less than those obtained for the Yes when[referendum 5].


"Those who die for the people to always live" Graffiti pro-FARC in 2011

Although some circumstantial factors have affected the result, as the speed with which the 
elections were convened that counted a campaign month alone - about a quarter of the usual 
time - and who have not permitted registering new voters and new voters, and also the 
climate effects of Matthew hurricane in the Caribbean region, they were not decisive.

What was on the other hand, it is the political caciques representing local political 
elites aligned with the central government in poor areas such as the Atlantic Coast, where 
until today paramilitarism is strong. These caciques have not deployed their patronage 
power as they had done in the last presidential election, with the goal to score a strong 
position within the coalition government and reorganize their projects to compete for 
election presidential 2018[6].

On the other hand, the institutional political left was weakened by divisions of the 
parliamentary forces of the Democratic Pole and the Green Alliance, by the warmth 
displayed by the sector led by Senator Jorge Enrique Robledo and MOIR in this political 
campaign by increasing integration of the social democratic sector of Clara López, new 
labor minister in the new cabinet of an unpopular government and the erosion of the 
progressive project of Gustavo Petro, after the end of the 12 years of center-governments 
left in Bogota. It failed to articulate a coherent pole for the Yes that can compete 
massively meanings of the position of this wing of the left face to those supported by the 
coalition government of Santos.

Similarly, it is also stressed that the union social movements, peasant, neighborhood, 
student, ethnic, environmental, gender, and human rights have bet the absolute majority 
way for Yes, making the defense of this process key feature of their action in the 
ultimate political cycle and in many cases used in full in the agitation for a favorable 
response in the referendum.

In general, we can note that all these forces have overestimated their electoral impact 
and failed to generate a sufficiently broad popular mobilization in support of peace among 
non-organized masses of the population. It is clear that the reorientation of the strategy 
of many social movements and political platforms to virtually exclusive mobilization 
dialogues about Havana and the construction of peace, was disarmed final.

Leaving the economic struggles in the background, they removed the ability to meet large 
social strata that today feel deep discomfort faced with government policies, in addition 
to virtually create a bifurcation between peacebuilding and struggles for the good life 
and critical of the current model.

The victory of the No

Secondly, it is also clear that the option contrary to the peace agreement is the big 
winner of the day. The No campaign led by a more united political alliance, structured 
around the Democratic Centre, has capitalized part of the social discontent toward the 
government weakened Santos.


An anti-FARC demonstration in 2008

cc Catalina Restrepo (ConVerGentes) / especial para Equinoxio
On one hand, it has prompted sectoral campaigns in traditionally conservative 
corporations, such as highway and road, fragmented social sectors like street vendors and 
vendors or the middle peasants and even the social sectors of union tradition but unhappy 
their organizations as the teachers.

On the other hand, she has engaged on a wave of conservative traditionalism driven by 
religious sectors who questioned timid, late and inconsistent policies of respect for 
sexual diversity of the Santos government, especially in homophobic protests triggered 
house rules manuals reform-driven projects of colleges by the Ministry of education.

It is important to add that the same characteristics of the long insurgency war lived in 
the country, which is presented as a civil low intensity war in some areas and at certain 
times, with a strong component of damage and casualties the civilian population, resulted 
in what the hegemonic block, which then is fragmented and ente santistes uribiste, is 
capable of carrying a large group of the population that identifies itself by a deep 
hatred for the FARC, combining traditional values anti-socialist bourgeois sectors and 
landowners with the deep conservatism of some popular sectors.

Similarly, it is important to emphasize that the uribisme gave a demonstration of the 
political capacity he enjoys managing to build a majority common sense which replaced the 
dichotomy 'peace and war "with that of" appeasement or renegotiation ". Ultimately, the No 
vote was a direct message to the incumbent government and in favor of the traditional 
strengths of the country (farmers, priests, landowners), more than a firm rejection of the 
negotiated end of armed conflict.

The massive abstention

The electoral abstention of 62.57%, the highest percentage in 22 years, has exceeded the 
traditional middle of the country, which since the middle of the period of the National 
Front is very high, even having tended to decline slightly during the past decade, 
continued to turn around 50% of registered es. This remains one of the highest percentages 
of abstention in the continent and it shows that half of the population, both urban and 
rural, do not participate in the political system they deem correctly as distant, corrupt 
and distant from their material interests.

A graffiti pro-FARC in Orito, in 2007

Beyond this historical trend, the current results reflect the weakness of direct political 
participation mechanism established by the 1991 constitution, which exceptions in contexts 
where social movements have a strong local power, received no application in a regime that 
maintains political exclusion. C

e above leads us to affirm that, despite significant outreach efforts, much of the 
population is incredulous to the agreements reached. This meets disbelief as the inability 
favorable stakeholders in the process to challenge much of the population that has had the 
ability to associate uribisme agreements with questionable government policies in an 
increasingly unfavorable time . Critics who have fallen on tax policy and the form in 
which the media-uribisme took advantage seems to be the most outstanding example.

Polarization and territorial fragmentation

Despite much of the political forces have sought for that campaigns are not converted into 
a bipartisan dispute, the poll has shown that even national politics continues to be 
marked by the traditional right represented in its two main business. On one hand, the 
Democratic Centre has mobilized its electoral base as evidenced by the fact that the 
departments where there were more votes in favor of No are those who launched the campaign 
Zuluaga in the last presidential elections: Casanare, Antioquia, Meta, Huila, Quindio, 
Risaralda and Caldas.

Conversely, National Unity saw a fragmentation at its social base and even within his 
coalition forces, as shown by the parties has acted as vice president of Radical Change 
Vargas Lleras preparing his candidacy for presidential elections 2018.

The influence of the international context

In world news we also note a number of trends affecting the Colombian political situation. 
First, in the midst of new waves of terrorist attacks against white-he-s civilian, led 
mainly by Islamic fundamentalists in different parts of the world, the imagination that 
links terrorism FARC tends to increase -in an authoritarian global agenda and sécuritaire- 
making more obscure the difference between acts of armed rebellion.

anti-FARC demonstration in 2007

On the other hand, the impact of the Conservative turning out important and named end of 
the cycle of progressive governments in Latin America, expressed by phenomena such as the 
recent coup against Parliamentary State Dilma Rousseff in Brazil, the political defeat of 
the referendum of Evo Morales in Bolivia, the electoral victories parliament of the 
Democratic unity Roundtable in Venezuela, or with the presidency of Mauricio Macri in 
Argentina and Pedro Pablo Kuczynski, Peru.

This turn takes a particularly acute form in Colombia, where the recent border crisis with 
Venezuela and the harsh economic crisis presents the government Nicolás Maduro are 
operated permanently by the Colombian right actively involved with the bourgeois 
opposition in the neighboring country and fantasized on more than one occasion of an open 
war against Chavismo. With the invocation of the fantasy of the "Castro Chavismo" embodied 
by the FARC, the uribisme has used it for the existing strong political rejection and 
built carefully by the Colombian establishment from all sides, with what he assumed was a 
of his greatest political threats.

Finally, it is clear that this second phase of the global economic crisis began in 2008, 
which led to the slow growth of the United States, European stagnation, the Japanese 
recession and the slowdown of the Chinese economy, with the resulting drop International 
commodity prices in general and mining-energy products in particular, has strongly 
affected a dependent economy like Colombia.

The latter has experience from two decades of process re-primarization and economic 
liberalization, leaving a fragile economy, softened and sin signs of immediate 
improvement, which led the national government to implement policies adjustment affecting 
the Colombian working people. And ads like higher taxes, just been used by opponents of 
dialogue with the FARC, saying that it will be the society as a whole which will assume 
the post-economic agreements spending, creating an infinite number of myths and false 
relations between the factors in an unfavorable political landscape increases the 
confusion in the population.

future scenarios

Weakened by a new political defeat, but to power through the support of a block of the 
dominant sector and without immediate prospects of resignation, it is clear that the 
Santos government has the legal capacity to give the current peace process continuity. The 
question is how?: Renegotiating and seeking an agreement that does not imply an 
endorsement? Using another consultation mechanism? A Constituent Assembly, as some 
suggest-es? These are all possible responses must be evaluated in light of the economy of 
forces nationally.

guerrilla of the FARC on leave in 2010

It seems that the dissident uribiste sector, led by the former candidate for mayor of 
Bogota, Francisco Santos, refers to the need for a national reconciliation pact to give 
the agreement continuity. Ultimately, this suggests to realize the old santiste aspiration 
to overcome the division within the bourgeoisie, to include the Democratic Centre, and in 
general the developers and promoters of No, a political bloc in favor of the agreement, 
which currently can not be achieved without questioning the supposed fundamental pact.

As for actors and actresses live-es of confrontation, we find that Santos in his 
presidential address reaffirmed its disposal to keep the process open, maintaining the 
cease-fire. For its part, the FARC has shown a willingness to continue the dialogue 
reaffirming the bilateral cease-fire and final obtained with the government there two 
months. However, facing the entrance areas of the most recalcitrant right that triumph 
today demanding the renegotiation of the terms for the outcome of the conflict between the 
oldest insurgency in Latin America and the Colombian State notoriously change. What makes 
more complex the current political landscape, since it opens the possibility that the FARC 
are being forced to take a different strategy, the same as other insurgent es actors and 
actresses as the ELN and the EPL.

our bet

The left and the social movements seem to plunge into perplexity and the evident inability 
to stake real alternatives in the current political moment. The strategic challenge 
continues to be reconfigured the current political configuration that puts the center of 
attention the clash between the hard right and the soft right.

As an organization libertarian, we consider that after the defeat of the Yes it necessary 
to continue to fight politically for a negotiated solution to the armed conflict between 
the government and the insurgency. Our bet is therefore to be that face the national pact 
between fractions of the bourgeoisie forced to reconcile, it is necessary to intensify 
efforts to achieve the militant unity of the working class and communities in struggle. We 
believe in transforming the collective imagination that have been imposed since the war 
against insurgency, which criminalize revolutionary alternatives today, and develop great 
strength popular movements that will be the protagonists in future scenarios political and 
social conflict.

We recognize that there are significant difficulties for such a purpose, but it also 
possible to overcome some of this problematic legacy through alliances among popular 
sectors in struggle, openness to other sectors and organizations, and programmatic 
innovation in the struggles. We continue to believe that it is urgent to forge the unity 
of those from below to create a popular movement with processing capacity. We assume in 
this bet and challenge of building a strong people, with class independence and organized 
since its foundation.

We are there, and from there we continue with the strong conviction that only the struggle 
and self-organization from below and to the left of the workers and popular sectors will 
be the only way to build alternatives to the live well; to build these other possible 
worlds for a more just and free society.

Standing those who struggle!

Libertario Grupo Vía Libre, Bogota, October 2016


[1]Comisión negociadora Gobierno nacional FARC-EP. Final acuerdo para the completion del 
conflicto y la construcción de una paz y estable duradera. On Mesadeconversaciones.com.co 
08/24/2016

[2]registraduria Nacional del Estado Civil. Nacional Boletín No. 43. Preconteo Plebiscito 
2 octubre 2016, Republic of Colombia. On plebiscitoregistraduria.gov.co .

[3]See for example: Vía Libre, "Ante el acuerdo de cese al fuego bilateral definitivo y el 
gobierno colombiano between y las FARC" ., 26 de junio de 2016. Or Julián Lopéz "El 
plebiscite, la izquierda y los sectores libertarios " .

[4]Asociación Comunicación Política. Ranking of Popularidad septiembre de 2016. On 
compolitica.com .

[5]Wikipedia. Elecciones presidenciales of Colombia in 2014 .

[6]El Tiempo, "The fue del Plebiscito the mayor abstención in 22 años" , October 2, 2016.

http://www.alternativelibertaire.org/?Colombie-La-victoire-du-Non-au

------------------------------

Message: 5




In this post we published a text of the anti-authoritarian movement Larisa, entitled "A 
proper response to the publication Avgi text" Who and how to determine the principles of 
the Left? " . This text, published in the newspaper of the ruling party Syriza few days 
after the eviction three squatters ceiling for refugees and immigrants, is a libel 
(misspelled) against self-organized structures, while defending bourgeois legality, and 
justifying Clampdown be reluctant to it. ---- As in this text reveals the true face and 
intentions of the Left, and the lack of dialectic and argumentation that governs his 
speech, is likely to devote another entry, highlighting some points of the text and giving 
an answer more local servants of neoliberal sovereignty.

In every action there is an illegal, ethics first fundamental rule, which answers to who 
and how "benefits" from it. Resorting to this rule we see that the argument of the 
illegality of the squatters and roof structures crumbles. Which leaves beneficiary is not 
the political subject that comes to the occupation of a building, but those in need by the 
living conditions imposed. The buildings used to provide roof (housing) and to relieve 
these people are carefully selected, and in no case are buildings used by others. In most 
cases, they are buildings that are in poor storage conditions, due to be abandoned and 
unused. The solidarity people strive to make them habitable again. Interestingly the 
application of the law is limited to projects of solidarity, in which no one gets away , 
but those who need to stay to meet the basic needs of survival, and does not touch the 
illegalities of financial gain. Let us see the law, but not squint.

As for the "beasts of the open sea" , we have long been watching the actions does the 
Left. They not have done that have ruled before her, and we have hopes that make them the 
next. The beasts of the open sea are also established on earth. Our solidarity is the only 
way we have to face in practice plans of these beasts. They are plans aimed at bring any 
hope to live decently, both we and immigrants, who are already part of our society. In 
this society we will defend it by all means.

With regard to the legality of a squatter, only laughter can give us the perspective of 
the author of the article, which focuses on the licenses (permits) and legal guarantees 
necessary. By the way, what permits that were achieved last winter to ride tents (for 
refugees) were? What were the assurances given to alojasen in these stores are entire 
families, children, sick and tired of being refugees? What law, ethics or written, allowed 
these people to live in this environment? How is the issue of health care of these people 
are confronted? They are relentless questions that have arisen seeing only the appearance 
of these "structures" "guaranteed" by the government, and they always make that cast doubt 
roof structures (self-organized), even if it is merely a occupied buildings. And by the 
way, it is obvious that these buildings were renovated and improved performance and 
aesthetics. In any case, it constituted a decent tent than any offered by the left of the 
principles and values ceiling. Our epicenter are refugees. Of course, we had no illusion 
that this was understood by those who trade figures and requirements in the halls of 
conventions, using the migration issue and the lives of refugees in the negotiations. If 
you have some honesty, however, implementing the decisions of the European Union that open 
and close the borders according to their interests and contribute to the poverty of the 
people, not talk of hostages. True activity is having real actions (true). These are ours 
and are against you.

As for the criteria of the "selection" of the refugees housed (in squats), only those who 
are far from such actions "do not know what (the criteria) , " as you mention in the 
article. The word selection is far from our desires and our moral need to support the 
rights of refugees. Our limited possibilities offer hospitality made us the most 
vulnerable first, in the framework of mutual respect, and obviously respecting rules 
(regulations) structured by the assemblies and not with decisions made by those above and 
executed by those below.

On Greek homeless and anti-authoritarians who are not interested in them, again you are 
misinforming. Is this intentional disinformation? Maybe you should ignore the fact that 
the squatters are also people of Greek origin, who are not fundamental to survive stayed. 
And you ought to expose some solid arguments nothing about a situation that you 
desconocéis and intentionally do not investigate. Information on the trials that followed 
the evictions of squatters ceiling and you know things would not say crap for no reason. 
If you were informed, you would know something of the ironic attitude of the judicial 
authorities towards our colleagues. After all that we ask how are recruited hostages, as 
you say, and as a party of them is removed. We count on your creativity to receive a reply 
with your arguments for libel about our intentions and our motives.

What the Left will henceforth have a certain importance, mainly for historical reasons. In 
our consciousness, no government, although self-denominated leftist, can not express our 
ideals and our dreams. The "ethics of the Left" and struggles should be present here today 
and should occur in the present. Memories of the past can not cross out or evictions of 
squatters and the fact that there were people who were thrown into the street and were 
dragged into lawsuits. With the invocation of the past can not be cross out the repressive 
military - type operations in middle of the night, against families with children ... the 
crime they committed sleep. You can continue to count your election or at least your 
commitments triumphs, however, you do not expect that we consent these commitments. We 
want for nothing appropriating your clientele. We headed to the caring people, which 
exists and hardens to build a world we deserve. A world that you can not give us . Declare 
your memos and let us count our souls.

No man in the street. No empty building.

------------------------------

Message: 6



The narration accompanied by photographs of Margaret Všelichová and Mirka Farkas, who went 
to northern Syria, to stand alongside Kurdish militia YPJ and YPG in Rojava defense 
against '. Islamic state. He rojava not only resisted, but now inflicts ISIS one defeat 
after another, and frees your neighbors. Liberated Rojava becomes hope for the entire 
Middle East, not only a successful defense against ISIS, but also the ongoing revolution 
based on the emancipation of women, social and economic autonomy. Margaret and rate well
organized material aid to people affected by the hardships of war directly in Syria - to 
lecture you will learn how you can help. It will of course be given space and discuss your 
questions.

FB event:[www.facebook.com/events/185667201869955/]

Date & Time:
Wednesday, 12 October, 2016 - 19:00
Category: bar/cafediscussion/presentationexhibition
Price: free

Tea Club in Decin
Hudeckova 664
Decin
Czech Republic

radar.squat.net/en/node/109186

------------------------------

Message: 7



On Saturday, October 15 in Europe there will be demonstrations and pickets against free 
trade treaties CETA (agreement European Union - Canada) and TTIP (the agreement EU - USA).
Both agreements have created a giant free trade zone and threaten workers' rights and 
consumer and the environment, and both have the support of the Polish government. The only 
chance to stop the TTIP and CETA are social protests that force the political elite to 
withdraw from these projects. In this fight must include also the trade unions because 
both agreements threaten our rights! ---- Workers' Initiative supports the protests 
against TTIP and CETA and encourages members and members of a compound to actively 
participate in demonstrations in Warsaw and Krakow:

Warsaw - hours. 13:00 The Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (ul. Wspólna 
30)[event on Facebook]

Krakow - hours. 13:00 Main Market[event on Facebook]

Basic problems of TTIP / CETA from the point of view of employees and workers:

International free trade agreements lead to job losses and lower wages. TTIP agreement 
could mean the loss of 100 thousand. jobs in Poland. As a result of CETA could disappear 
over 200 thousand. jobs in the EU. The effect of trade liberalization is usually only a 
wage increase executives of multinational corporations, while the salaries of rank and 
workers stand in place or are reduced.

A very serious problem with free trade is a "race to the bottom" and deregulation of 
regulations on occupational safety and health. After signing the agreements TTIP / CETA 
national governments will be subjected to pressure to bring the regulations to protect 
employees and workers to the lowest level (eg. To permit cheaper, but harmful to the 
health of production technologies, which are allowed in other countries of the free trade 
area).

TTIP / CETA also strengthens the institution of arbitration investor-versus-state (ISDS), 
whereby corporations can sue the state and undermine the law, "threatening their future 
profits." Every year the state pay billions of dollars as a result of decisions within 
ISDS. This money will mean a real loss for national budgets and local, and hence - 
restrictions on public spending. Corporate profits are placed far above the common good. 
Eg. Egypt under this system was sued by corporations Veolia for raising the minimum wage. 
In the long run, this leads to the fact that countries are afraid to improve working 
conditions, because it threatens them with high compensations for corporations.

Agreement introduce a threat to certain sectors due to the lowering of import duties (this 
applies to 99% of the duties currently in force between Canada and the EU). This means 
that local production will not be protected against competition from transnational 
corporations that are able to sell their goods cheaper thanks to mass production, cheaper 
energy and a much lower environmental standards. It threatens the small and medium-sized 
enterprises in Poland and - in particular - agriculture. It always reflects on the 
situation of employees and workers.

These agreements are negotiated in secret, virtually without the participation of trade 
unions and other civil society organizations, bypassing democratic procedures. Consent 
agreements TTIP / CETA will constitute the final victory beyond any social control over 
corporate societies. The victory, which for a long funeral any hopes of a fairer system of 
socio-economic development and further worsen the situation of workers and employees.

Workers' Initiative supports the protests against CETA and TTIP and encourages all and all 
to participate in the mobilization of 15 October.

First, people then profits!

http://www.rozbrat.org/publicystyka/kontrola-spoeczna/4487-mobilizacja-przeciwko-ceta-i-ttip-

http://w.ozzip.pl/teksty/informacje/ogolnopolskie/item/2183-15-pazdziernika-moblizacja-przeciwko-ceta-i-ttip

------------------------------

Message: 8



Thursday, June 23, 2016 has undoubtedly marked a historic date in Colombia. That day, in 
the dialogues of peace and Havana negotiating table, the state government of Juan Manuel 
Santos and the insurrection of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia - People's Army 
(FARC-EP) have agreed a bilateral and definitive cease-fire. ---- For many Colombians and 
Colombians, it is a burning desire come true. Without ceasing to share the popular 
enthusiasm, we note that this is not yet the end of the war and there is a long way to go 
to achieve social change and real benefits for the workers, the social sectors and 
peoples. ---- We, Grupo Vía Libre Libertario, we recognize the historical importance of 
these agreements for the country since it is obvious that much of the population no longer 
wished to live a war so degrading and cruel like ours and that is so a good reason to 
celebrate for many people and communities. In this sense, we must recognize many positive 
elements in these agreements, such as the fact that the oldest and sustainable insurgent 
force in Latin America abandons the armed struggle without going so far and finished by a 
violent pact confrontation between the group and the state, resulting in a breakthrough 
for various popular political organizations that seek that social struggles are most 
listened in the spheres of government. However, there remain many challenges and must 
continue to develop the struggles and claims.

These agreements, which formalize a truce made with various upheavals between armed actors 
since 2013, represented a quantum leap on the way out of the armed struggle. Nevertheless 
we believe that there is still much to do, since there were no negotiations with other 
insurgent groups, but little real importance, such as the National Liberation Army or the 
People's Army liberation, which took up arms as the FARC-EP since half a century, with 
which the government has not shown a great willingness to dialogue. Especially since the 
end of armed conflict did not mark the social conflict that generated marked by extreme 
social inequality, especially in the countryside, the usurpation of land by the rural 
bourgeoisie and landowners and terrorist policies of the state to repress the social movement.

We note that this year was marked by several waves of social conflicts that have converged 
in protest days as January 24, the national strike of 17 March, the third largest national 
agrarian strike struggles which in turn reinforced the idea to organize a strong national 
civic blockage that has reduced the anti-people policies of the government. Thus, various 
sectors of the peasant movement, indigenous and black, with jointly the workers and 
laborers, professors, students and workers and informal workers, demonstrated a strong 
rejection of neo-liberal policies of the second government of Juan Manuel Santos that 
increase insecurity and social inequality.

At the same time, most committed sectors stressed the need to support the process of 
dialogue between the government and the insurgency, seeking the establishment of peace 
with social justice and saw the signing of agreements means that the voices of workers and 
peoples historically excluded are heard. Similarly, they have supported the transformation 
of the FARC-EP as a political party with guarantees of security and participation in the 
rules of the current democracy. While this may generate the possibility of guaranteeing 
the rights of the political opposition in a country with an institutional system also 
closed a real democratic opening remains to be seen.

We emphasize that neither the ruling class nor their state apparatus does not have 
everything to lose in this situation, since it is signed on paper is not a real guarantee 
for the fulfillment of the agreements. Just remember the systematic violation by the same 
government signed agreements following the National Agrarian Block of August and September 
2013, which led peasant movements, black and indigenous organize the National Agrarian 
Summit, leading again with success an intense social movement in which indigenous 
villagers Willington Quibarecama, Gersain Cerón and Marco Aurelio Díaz were murdered by 
state repression.

We also note that, although they had sold the idea of a new country under the banner of 
peace, the government has yet to demonstrate by concrete facts his willingness to 
demilitarize society, a desire that is not necessarily evident in view of the 
criminalization of the struggles of the oppressed classes and sectors, or the continued 
imprisonment of political prisoners such as intellectual Miguel Ángel Beltrán. Similarly, 
one of the things that puts more doubt on the willingness of government peace is the 
validation of a new Police Code that strengthens the repression and waiting for the 
exercise of several freedoms of the civilian population.

We must also denounce the dangerous role of the extreme right uribiste (former President) 
in this new political landscape through his campaign for the "No" in a referendum on the 
ratification of a peace process with intended to derail the peace process as it has 
fought. On the other side, the campaign for the "Yes" is conducted primarily by the 
National Unity (santiniste, the party of the current president), and to a lesser extent, 
by the majority of left forces.

This highlights a trend of polarization around the agreements signed in Havana, which 
would have as main camps two variants, neo-liberal right of Santos and Uribe authoritarian 
right, the latter being presented by the media as the main force political opposition to 
the government media who until recently supported the war against-insurrectionelle. The 
role of the left and popular movements in the eventual referendum, although still limited 
asset, shows that the people have little impact in the political landscape.

Do not forget the recent increase in paramilitary activities, murdered in recent months 
various popular leaders, particularly the peasants. Poorly-called "criminal bands" 
(BACRIM), which are none other than the new form of paramilitary, exercise daily 
domination of many territories allied to the military, political notables and 
entrepreneurs, as we have seen with the recent military strike called by these forces in 
the Urabá region, and at the same time pursue, threaten and murder members of the social 
and political left. The para-militarism, supported by civil resistance strategy pursued by 
Uribe, poses a great threat in this new scenario, since there is always a risk of 
political genocide, as could suffer the generation of social struggles for years 80 
organized by activists of the patriotic Union of Struggle, the popular Front or the union 
social movements, peasants, and indigenous.

Finally, we consider that although the end of the armed struggle of a guerrilla group the 
size of the FARC-EP is something important we must not forget that we still face a 
state-insurgency against which has a symbolic and material violence against the classes 
and subordinate sectors to maintain a social order based on exploitation, inequality and 
exclusion of workers, social sectors and peoples. Let it not be forgotten that there is 
still a repressive apparatus that works instantly suppress any protest those from below 
than from above regard as illegitimate. Let it not be forgotten that although the end of 
the guerrilla opens a new stage in the class struggle in this country, the capitalist 
order, statist, patriarchal worldwide is inherently violent, as will the befall the 
revolutionary process.

In an anarchist organization we call to intensify the momentum of organization, 
mobilization and basic multi-sectoral struggles, as we do on multiple planes, among others 
in the student struggles in education, territories on gender and communication, among 
others. As we have already said, much remains to be done. In this context of partial peace 
between two parties must bet on the construction of true peace for the workers, the 
workers and peoples, formed from the local community and initiative, from where inequality 
and exclusion are the daily bread. We must continue to carry the socialist libertarian 
impetus to the construction of autonomy, self-management and the people's power in all 
territories where we work.

It is not enough that those above open the possibility of participating in bourgeois 
democracy, because it is extremely limited, it is functional to its rule and that it is 
not that it will materialize opportunities radical change of the relations of domination 
and oppression. In the current context, we reaffirm that the construction of another world 
is possible through the elimination of capitalism and the state, which are responsible for 
the main war waged against the people, that of hunger, of exploitation and dispossession 
of the commons.

It was certainly a historic day, but there is still much to do that through the force 
organized and mobilized our people we can build a fairer and freer life.

Grupo Libertario Via Libre, June 24, 2016, Bogota

http://www.alternativelibertaire.org/?Colombie-analyse-rouge-et-noire-a

------------------------------