Now that several e-mails on Hillary Clinton's private server have been classified, there is a more immediate question than the outcome of the investigation: Should the former secretary of state retain her security clearance during the inquiry? Congressional Republicans and Democrats offer predictably different answers.
The State Department announced Friday that it would not release 22 e-mails from Clinton’s private server after a review found they contained information designated as top secret. U.S. officials who reviewed the e-mails tell us they contain the names of U.S. intelligence officers overseas, but not the identities of undercover spies; summaries of sensitive meetings with foreign officials; and information on classified programs like drone strikes and intelligence-collection efforts in North Korea.
Read more ....
Update: Lawmaker Says He’s ‘Never Read Anything That’s More Sensitive’ Than Information In Hillary’s ‘Top Secret’ Emails (Daily Caller)
WNU Editor: US Democrat Senators who have read the emails are trying their best to defend Hillary Clinton .... but it is getting harder everyday. What's my take .... setting up an independent server to handle your communications .... and not being sensitive on what was being sent or received .... poor judgement does not even come close to explaining this. And as to the argument on whether she should keep her security clearance or not .... I know that if it was anyone else .... it would be taken away on the spot and that person would be facing some serious charges.