Shane Harris, Daily Beast: Apple Unlocked iPhones for the Feds 70 Times Before
A 2015 court case shows that the tech giant has been willing to play ball with the government before—and is only stopping now because it might ‘tarnish the Apple brand.’
Apple CEO Tim Cook declared on Wednesday that his company wouldn’t comply with a government search warrant to unlock an iPhone used by one of the San Bernardino killers, a significant escalation in a long-running debate between technology companies and the government over access to people’s electronically-stored private information.
But in a similar case in New York last year, Apple acknowledged that it could extract such data if it wanted to. And according to prosecutors in that case, Apple has unlocked phones for authorities at least 70 times since 2008. (Apple doesn’t dispute this figure.)
In other words, Apple’s stance in the San Bernardino case may not be quite the principled defense that Cook claims it is. In fact, it may have as much to do with public relations as it does with warding off what Cook called “an unprecedented step which threatens the security of our customers.”
Read more ....
WNU Editor: Some are calling for Apple to comply with this court order .... Unlock That iPhone, Apple (Bloomberg editorial), while others are supporting Apple's position .... Tech CEOs in support of Apple vs FBI (CNBC). What's my take .... I love my privacy, and I know too well that if given the tools to violate it .... governments will. But I have to wonder if this was a "ticking nuclear bomb" situation and not an iPhone from two dead terrorists .... would Apple be so principled. My guess is that they would not .... as the above Daily Beast story reveals.