![]() | |
| Gundestrup Cauldron Northern Denmark 100 BC-1AD National Museum of Denmark |
"It is not Celtic.." begins the description in Ian Leins' catalogue. But let's go back a bit. The whole exhibition at the Britiah Museum was at pains to educate us about the use of this problematic term.
Just who were the Celts and why are we so sure we know what Celtic art looks like? Scotland, Ireland, Wales, the Isle of Man, Cornwall and Brittany - that's where they hung out, isn't it? And everyone knows what a Celtic cross is like; it has that circular or extra square bit at the crossing and will be covered in intricate, interlaced swirling patterns. That version is known to us from innumerable New Age gift shops and vaguely occult outlets.
![]() |
| Cross slab Monfieth AD 700-800 National Museums Scotland |
And two and a half thousand years is a long time for any similarities in art to last. Greek and Roman writers were not consistent in what they took the term to mean; early medieval British literature refers to Gaels, Scots, Picts and Britons; the word "Celts" meaning some inhabitants of the British Isles doesn't occur till the eighteenth century. And then it was the linguists, noticing similarities between the languages once used in those parts we later came to call the Celtic Fringe.
One of the first exhibits to be seen on entering was what was called in the older exhibition a "Janus statue." (though that was a replica then too).
![]() |
| The Glauberg statue, Horzgelingen, Germany 500-400 BC, Stuttgart |
One of my friends described leaving this exhibition with "torc envy." This is the sort of display that caused the feeling:
![]() |
| The Blair Drummond torcs, Stirling 300-100 BC |
{I've obviously had a bit of Torc Envy in my own life, as I found I owned five, plus a ?copper and bronze bracelet of the same design):
| The Hoffman hoard, Oxfordshire late 20th/early 21st century |
| 200-50 BC, Trustees of the British Museum. |
In fact this is part of the abiding attraction of the "Celts." So relatively little is known of their history and culture, except what can be deduced from the artifacts, that we can project our own fantasies on to them. Maybe this is why in the nineteenth century, prompted by archaeological finds, "celtic" designs, especially in jewellery, became fashionable and popular, leading to the Celtic Revival linked to the Arts and Crafts movement.
Back to the Gundestrup cauldron. It was discovered, in pieces, in a peat bog in Denmark in 1891. One of the eight external plates is missing and the whole thing had to be reconstructed. The figures are animal, human and godlike, some wearing torcs. It is about 2,000 years old and appears to tell a story or set of stories, perhaps featuring mythical beings like Cernunnos, the stag-antlered god. (see the first picture in this post)
Bagsie writing that story!
What is your favourite association with the Celts, whether in art, literature or language?
All images taken, with permission, from the British Museum Press pack for the exhibition The Celts: Art and Identity.










