Deploying 10,000 U.S. Troops To Wage War Against The Islamic State Will Not Be Enough

A collection of vehicles built to resist mine blasts and protect occupants from ambush are parked in a holding yard at Camp Arifjan, Kuwait, awaiting shipment. (Army photograph)

Kevein Benson, War On The Rocks: 10,000 Won't Do It: The Mathematics Of An American Deployment To Fight ISIL

Since followers of the self-proclaimed Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) have launched a succession of attacks in Paris, Sen Bernardino, Indonesia, and elsewhere, we have been inundated with another wave of recommendations on how to fight this group. Distinguished senators and retired generals, along with security and terrorism experts, are saying the United States must commit ground forces into the fray.

Senator John McCain “wants 10,000 U.S. ground troops in Syria to crush the Islamic State — and blames President Barack Obama’s lack of leadership and strategy for the “phenomena of ISIS.” McCain, who has some experience at war, wants action now and is of course also seeking political advantage in attacking the current administration. In a recent interview retired Marine General Anthony Zinni also called for immediate action. He repeated the call for 10,000 troops to be deployed. Zinni said, “Limited airstrikes against [Islamic State] targets are not enough,” but “Two brigades would take ISIS out of Iraq in a heartbeat.” According to Zinni: “You cannot control people and ground without ground forces.” Even before Paris there were calls for such action.

Read more ....

WNU Editor: This post is an analysis that examines the nuts and bolts of what is necessary to deploy U.S. ground forces against the Islamic State. Bottom line .... it takes a lot of personnel and resources to field 10,000 soldiers .... and what is being proposed is not enough.

Related Posts: