The cartoon on the left is from a few months ago but expresses how Kurds saw the role of
the Turkish state towards ISIS and the conflict in Syria. Considerable evidence of support
for ISIS from the Turkish state has been published in the international media over the
last months. An ISIS commander told the Washington Post on August 12, 2014, "We used to
have some fighters -- even high-level members of the Islamic State -- getting treated in
Turkish hospitals." ---- This Sunday the Observer revealed details of a US Special forces
raid on an ISIS compound. "One senior western official familiar with the intelligence
gathered at the slain leader's compound said that direct dealings between Turkish
officials and ranking ISIS members was now "undeniable"." Oil smuggling was what that ISIS
leader was co-ordinating with the Turkish officials and ISIS were getting an "estimated
$1m-$4m per day in oil revenue"
Turkey now claims to have switched sides but the reality of both its bombing campaign and
police raids in Turkey is that while they tell the international media they are targeting
ISIS the targets are Kurds and the Turkish radical left.
One very clear illustration of who Turkey has really gone to war with is found in this
record of who has been arrested in the raids over the last days (21 - 28 July).
People arrested: total 1034 (36 are children).
140 ISIS member,
22 Fetullah Gülen movement
872 PKK/KCK and other leftist groups
SOURCE
The Gülen movement are an oppositional group whose leader lives in the US and don't belong
to either camp so excluding them, we see that for every 1 ISIS arrest there were 6 arrests
of people from the left including the Kurdish left.
In other words there has been no change of policy by the Turkish state, the primary
objective remains the defeat of the Rojava revolution. Previously they had been hoping
that ISIS could accomplish this for them, acting as a deniable proxy. However it recently
became clear that ISIS is not currently capable of defeating the YPG/J.
Once US air support had stripped the advantage of the US armour and heavy weapons ISIS had
captured at Mosul, ISIS first ground to a halt at Kobane and then were driven back. In
addition media stories reporting on Turkish support for ISIS made it hard for the Obama
administration to continue to pretend not to notice.
At the same time the US had found that the Kurdish forces in general, and the YPG/J in
particular were the only reliable cannon fodder in the region willing to fight against
ISIS on the ground, and thus provide accurate information for targeting air strikes. We
use the word cannon fodder deliberately, the US is entirely cynical about its co-operation
with the YPG/J as demonstrated in recent months by the refusal to provide them with heavy
weaponry, but much more starkly in the last fews days as Obama clearly told Erdogan that
the US would stand by while the Turkish air force bombed their only effective allies. In
return the US gets the use of Incirlik air base.
What about the mass bombings carried out by the Turkish air force, are these also directed
at ISIS in an effective sense or just for show? So far from the information we've been
able to gather, what Turkey is doing here is even more blatant. The air war started with
an air strike against ISIS, possibly involving 3 planes, which was announced to the media
but which ISIS claimed had hit nothing. Since then it seems almost all the airstrikes, and
there have been dozens of them (185 sorties against 400 targets according to Al Monitor),
have been hitting Kurdish positions across Kurdistan, that is in South West Turkey, Iraq
and even Syria. As the (UK) Independent put it yesterday "In the first two days of the
Turkish campaign it sent only a few planes to bomb Syria while there were 185 air missions
against about 400 PKK targets. " Reporting on last night's strikes, described as the
heaviest yet, which hit only Kurdish positions even Reuters commented "Turkey's assaults
on the PKK have so far been far heavier than its strikes against Islamic State, fuelling
suspicions that its real agenda is keeping Kurdish political and territorial ambitions in
check, something the government denies."
This is a good point to question the uncritical way the western media has taken up the
Turkish state and media's use of PKK as the designation of the armed wing. The reality is
that the PKK is more of a political organisation, its relation to its armed wing, the HPG
is not that dissimilar to the relationship between the Sinn Fein political party and the
IRA in Ireland. However in Ireland both British and Irish states recognised the
distinction and as a result even at the height of the war, although Sinn Fein was censored
and its members subject to repression, it was never banned and membership was never
illegal. Both Irish and British states wanted to leave a political door open to ending the
conflict. The Turkish state on the other hand has not only waged a brutal
counterinsurgency campaign in which 40,000 were killed but has relentlessly criminalised
all radical Kurdish political organisation, essentially trying to close off the political
road to peace.
Not only was the PKK banned but even broader Kurdish political formations like the KCK
were also targeted. The KCK is the formation set up to implement the idea of "democratic
confederalism" which draws from the theories of libertarian municipalism, social ecology,
and Communalism developed by the American anarchist political philosopher Murray Bookchin.
Which is broadly similar to what is being implemented in Rojava. Some 7748 people were
arrested for KCK involvement in Turkey between April 2009 and October 2011, those charged
were charged with membership of an illegal organization under Article 314 of the Turkish
Penal Code.
We are not insisting that there is no connection between the PKK and the HPG. That would
be quite stupid. Nor are we insisting there is no connection between the PKK and KCK. But
we think it's a mistake to reproduce the Turkish state's insistence that an armed military
organisation is identical to a political party which is identical in turn to the mass
assembly formation that party has launched. More than a mistake, confusing the three
provides ideological cover for the repression of the KCK in particular. Part of the reason
for maintaining this distinction is also that it is clear that these different formations
have distinct methods and tactics even if the fact of ongoing repression re-enforces the
need to maintain a unified public face. The actions of the Turkish state are designed to
provoke a response from the more militaristically inclined, a response that will then be
used to justify further escalation.
What is the Turkish state up to?
1. It is continuing its original objective of damaging its main non EU rival in the
region, the Assad regime in Syria. That was the original reason for backing ISIS and other
Islamist forces (al-Nusra) in the Syrian civil war. With the US increasingly involved and
ISIS proving a weak force when faced with the determined enemy of the Rojava revolution
ISIS are, it appears, being partially ditched, at least for now. Although the so called
safe zone in North-West Syria which Turkey claims to be creating will in effect prevent
the Kurds capturing the area now held by ISIS and al-Nusra. Which means the Turkish secret
state maintains a supply route to both groups if it cares to use it.
2. The HPG unilateral ceasefire in Turkey along with the role HPG combatants play in
defeating ISIS in Syria and Iraq was causing many in the EU and even the US military to
question whether the PKK should be removed from the list of terrorist groups. This would
have been a disaster for Turkish state diplomacy in reversing one of its major successes
of the post 9/11 era. The airstrikes are clearly intended to provoke retaliation from the
HPG, retaliation which will be used to maintain the terrorist status of the PKK
internationally and repress the PKK and KCK domestically.
3. Erdogan's future plans for Turkey. Erdogan had hoped to come out of the last elections
with enough of a parliamentary majority for his AKP party to impose a new constitution
which would keep him in power and eliminate the secular basis of the Turkish state. A
combination of the Gezi park rising, fear of that new constitution and the HPG unilateral
ceasefire allowed a new Kurdish/left party the HDP to break the 10% electoral carried
designed to prevent a Kurdish party being able to take seats in parliament. The 13% vote
the HDP achieved not only reduced but eliminated the AKP majority and since then Turkey
has been under a lame duck caretaker rule of a party that no longer has the majority to
impose its will.
If as seems likely the bombings of the HPG and the large scale police arrests of PKK, KCK
and other leftists provokes an armed response than Erdogan probably hopes to call fresh
elections in a highly polarised situation where the HDP will not get the required 10%. The
AKP will then be almost certainly returned with a majority of seats and maybe even the
super majority it needs to impose a new constitution unilaterally. On the other hand polls
shows that a large majority of people in Turkey are against an invasion of Syria and
indeed even among AKP votes more would prefer to see the PYD win out than ISIS.
4. Erdogan has sworn to prevent the formation of a Kurdish autonomous region in Rojava by
whatever means are required. As long as the US found the YPG/J useful in its war against
ISIS the means the Turkish military could deploy were limited. The conditions the Turkish
state is now creating will make the YPG/J less useful, will increase the cost for the US
of building a deeper relationship with them and open up the possibility of creating the
conditions where the majority of the Turkish public might accept an invasion of Rojava.
It was always clear that the Rojava revolution was a fragile thing, operating in a gap
created by the Syrian civil war between major military powers. The actions of the Turkish
state are designed to shut that gap. The US is co-operating in that project even if it is
also for now using the YPG/J as cannon fodder. The only thing that can defeat that project
is a revolt by a sizeable section of the population in Turkey backed up by large protests
in the US and Europe against the cynical role that the US and NATO are playing.
http://www.wsm.ie/c/turkish-state-launches-massive-assault-kurds-isis
Home »
» Ireland wsm.ie: Turkish state launches massive assault on Kurds under cover of finally tackling ISIS by Andrew Flood