(en) anarkismo.net: The anti-authoritarian behavior by
Argyris Argyriadis - IWW Greece (gr) [machine translation]
If need admonition in this area is supposedly the undisputed exponent of self-realization
and determination, as a basic condition of freedom, the reprojection and the reflection
thereof (freedom) to the daily transaction other space confirms the dominant stereotypismo
of arrogant anarchist utopian personality. And this is not the fault of the other and of
course neither the power. If not eliminated this convenient behavior pretense, then it
could be claimed that it actually corresponds to the person - operator of liberating
ideas. ---- The Bakouros Prokopis, Croutons and above the Malaperdas * !!! ---- * Why
Bakunin, Kropotkin, Proudhon and Malatesta no longer inspire 'here'. On the occasion of
the recent phenomena of social cannibalism. --- The anti-authoritarian behavior of
arrogant figure of speech, as a way of life and practice should ideally satisfy at least
two basic assumptions:
First: Be it for granted then that all those involved in the broader antiauthoritarian
-anarchiko space, guided by some basic, general and completely different values from those
of the dominant system of ideas, political and social organization.
2: it must also be assumed that these values accompany and reproduced in daily contact and
communication of anyone inside or outside the premises.
Nobody will disagree seemingly sounding words and concepts such as antierarchiki building,
direct-democratic procedures, aformalismos, solidarity, camaraderie, openness, acceptance
of diversity, etc. Since we seek and not find elsewhere, which is why we believe that we
are not assimilated in homogeneous environment of the modern authoritarian world. But
finally caught up to the introverted uniformity of our "different" world, which tends to
look like the old we refuse.
It is time to ask ourselves with all the cruelty inherent honesty and courage attributed
to a -eleftheriaki antiauthoritarian personality that balances personal ego individuality
with us of collegiality if this expected "liberating" behavior of unconditional donation
It responds to the daily reality and concludes with the aims of the means and values of
anarchism aimed at liberation and emancipation.
The main characteristics of an anti-authoritarian personality as a separate
anthropological type distinguished in transparency, openness of character, sense of
cooperation, love for others as a project for the active participation in direct democracy
procedures. The faceted thinking, denial stereotypismou & taboos, practice outside boxes,
watertight and established the educational character of the partner - mentor experience,
knowledge and skills to others and the immediacy of communication, without a trace of
hypocrisy complement the long directory.
In practice, in contrast to the above, we are dealing with a generalized "participatory
passivity" or otherwise with an arrogant "otinane-ism" with many egotika & petty bourgeois
characteristics. Indeed, the lack of commitment, the kafeneiakos way communication,
gossip, procrastination, lack of imagination and courage are highly dominant. Very often
the devaluation of the other, giving him a fantasy role eterokathorizomeno insignificance
is a key component of today's reality of space. But not only that, the "anarchoumeni"
behavior of violence in any guise contribute more to social cannibalism and distaste of
society.
The uncoordinated way of organizing and communication, the failure to complete long-term
objectives, they need commitment, planning, strategic, coordinated and systematic action
is the result of this inconsistency, to ourselves as subjects of liberation of our own
everyday reality. Not assisted by a sustained scamper to anticipate events and introverted
goldfish memory, forcing us most of the time to come back to issues that have been solved
and finished in the previous year. This behavior creates a secluded mentality within the
limits of a tailor and demarcated mental prison. - The space, the Assembly or the refusal
of the - I.
The personal inconsistency ideological pretext, creates a consistent independence, a
singular internal enemy -katapiesti in relation to the other / s. The insufficiency of
daily reconciliation and entrainment of the one-way one-way engagement which for many is
itself political engagement as a way of life and escape from the harsh reality. This
unambiguous behavior beyond the coverage of leisure, there is finally an escape but a
constant pretense of personal disclosure: I'm OK (DEMOK).
If you do not accept this person as a basic condition in daily transaction, then as a
defense mechanism developed tendency individually and collectively You're OK (DESOK). Most
disagreements and conflicts within the collectives and people of the area are of such
character conciliator and not political. The situation DEMOK -DESOK prevents not only
people to reach the self-determined behavior and reasonable adult'm OK - You're OK
(EMOK-ECCG), but remain in this eterokathorizomenou of spoiled children who seek emotional
vindication through non-fulfillment of conditions the desires of others. The autistic
narcissism of the "mess" violence is typical case. So insurgents or angry; When
conciliative situation away from the stage of the "game" and transferred to the political
conflict taken for granted and unavoidable. Because the face of the other Parent
recognized who asks the admonition, punishment, suppression of Children's Wish. This
parental oppression from each other serves to confirm the personal shortcomings inwardly
remain trapped in the unconscious deliberately pretending not exist. In this case, our own
space the result unless the rejection of the individual body comes the conceptual
rejection of the constitution, the methodikotitas, and the organization as political &
ex'adiametrou opposite values and attitudes, baptized as authoritative, sovereign or even
formalist and "koinonistikes'.
The problem with the defenders of violence is not the same as violence itself, but the
legitimacy of power, as a capable regulator to control the "lawlessness". And the problem
is propolitiko the base in nature and in its essence, for the outside observer:
"So if we won capitalism and the state and" egkathidrousame "anarchy and libertarian
society. The logical question would be on the first anniversary of the proclamation of
freedom, who would protect us from the more "libertarians" who want to discredit the fact;
"Although the question is totally inappropriate, invalid and methodological error because
it will establish Anarchy, but together with the people we will jointly organize the
libertarian society, and certainly not if we do not need such system memory ceremonies.
But the content of the reasoning contains a grain of truth because it reproduces the
conventional thinking of the third observer. Because on the one hand it shows that the
transition to freedom does not involve any real change both for those who change
(anarchists) those who suffer it (society) but also those who tarnish (the most
insurrectionary). Namely that the scheme continues to be real.
This way the conventional thinking must prove that it is unrealistic and that things can
change. And why should we believe that the uncontrolled violence (which baptized
insurrectionary) that is part of the conventional way of thinking and acting, because not
only does not liberate, but in fact contributes to the demerit of the race and on the
assumption that nothing changes.
At this point they should all stand and answer honestly to themselves. If need admonition
in this area is supposedly the undisputed exponent of self-realization and determination,
as a basic condition of freedom, the reprojection and the reflection thereof (freedom) to
the daily transaction other space confirms the dominant stereotypismo of arrogant
anarchist utopian personality. And this is not the fault of the other and of course
neither the power. If not eliminated this convenient behavior pretense, then it could be
claimed that it actually corresponds to the person - operator of liberating ideas.
http://www.anarkismo.net/article/28422
