Some Reflections on Reclaim Australia by Tom

(en) anarchistaffinity: Some Reflections on Reclaim
Australia, by Tom

The following is written by a member of Anarchist Affinity and an active Antifascist. ---- 
It seems obvious that the main conflict and debate that is raging in the immediate 
aftermath of the latest round of Reclaim Australia isn't even about the fascists, but 
about the police, though the two are linked. Many people are shocked by the level of 
violence and aggression displayed by the police, and plenty of people are condemning those 
on the left for physical confrontation as much as they are the fascists. I think both of 
these views are mistaken. ---- For a start let's deal with the police. It's important that 
our media explains that the cops aren't on our side- but let's not pretend to be 
surprised either. Many people see the police through the traditional liberal lens- that 
they exist to protect society from crime. For the many people who copped pepper spray, 
saw the police pepper spray medics, took random punches to the face and received cursory 
"fuck offs" from the police yesterday, that notion is not going to gell particularly well 
with their feelings at the moment. Marxist or Anarchist theory will point out to you that 
the police exist to protect private property and the state, and little else.

Yesterday was one of the more open 'iron fist under the velvet glove' moments we've had in 
Australia in a while. Certainly the most since I've been an activist. Believing that cops 
exist to protect you probably means that you're from a somewhat privileged background 
whereby the police are more friendly/less violent towards you. Try asking some of the 
blackfellas from Redfern why they don't like cops; or the Grocon workers who have had 
their pickets smashed by riot cops because they went on strike to defend safe workplace 
conditions. The police are the armed protection of a stratified class society, and when 
they defend and facilitate fascist rallies based on the liberal 'free speech laws', what 
they're doing is defending movements (i.e the racist fascists) who's growth will smash 
working class and civil rights.

There are numerous reports of racism within the Australian police force, and countless 
black deaths in custody that no one has ever been charged for; the Australian police are 
not in any way exceptional, their acts of oppression and racism are similar to that of the 
police forces in other nations. Control and oppression just come with the role. The 
psychology of police can be debated by other people, I don't doubt that there are police 
who genuinely take the job thinking of the 'positive' social roles, but that's not 
inherently what the role of the police force is. That is why people use slogans like ACAB 
(All Cops Are Bastards). Not because they're so ignorant to think every individual police 
person is necessarily an absolute bastard. Part of building a revolutionary movement will 
mean, at some stage, confronting and dismantling the police institution and replacing it 
with something that's actually democratic. With something that responds to working class 
needs whilst maintaining the few positive social roles they do have and destroying the rest.

So, the police pulling pepper spray was 'in response to violence from the left', 
apparently. Maybe this is true, I certainly saw some of it. But I sure as hell will not 
condemn anyone for it*, especially when known nazi squads deliberately wandered into our 
crowd provoking a fight. Violence should never be a first resort or even an ideology, and 
by the same token neither should non-violence. They are simply strategies employed for 
political purposes. We are not living in a fantasy world, where everyone is going to 
'respect' everyone else and just stand around in the streets and have a big debate over 
cupcakes or tea or something. I had friends there yesterday whose rage I think was/is 
entirely justified; whose family members have been racially abused and attacked for years. 
Of course they were going to be really fucking angry. Yesterday they wanted to defend 
their themselves and their communities, and what they faced was an active racist and 
fascist movement on the streets, with the police backing them up. You can only take so 
much abuse before you fight back.

Some reading of the history of fascism will point out to you that fascist politics is 
entirely about physical domination of the streets and their opponents. Hitlers 
'Blackshirts', Mussolinis 'Brownshirts', the National Front etc. We are dealing with much 
more than our local fundamentalist anti-abortion Catholics here. Reclaim, the United 
Patriots Front and their fellows on the far-right aim to use their cries of 'free speech' 
and their 'politically acceptable' rallies to start building political space and a 
movement that will grow to allow them to dominate. At times the first call of response has 
been violent confrontation - we know the anarchists and communists of 1930s Germany had to 
employ street fighting as a tactic, and maybe if our liberal friends had supported them 
Hitler may not have won. The Battle of Cable Street is another classic example. Red Action 
in the 80's UK forced the Nationalist movements to retreat in ways that were extremely 
successful.

"Only one thing could have broken our movement - if the adversary had understood its 
principle and from the first day had smashed with extreme brutality the nucleus of our new 
movement." - Adolf Hitler, 1933 Nuremberg Nazi Party rally.

*I was pepper sprayed twice yesterday, the first time was because I was attempting to pull 
away a fascist who had a) punched a friend in the face and b) attempted to choke another. 
At that stage, he hadn't been attacked by the left. Then the cops attempted to arrest me. 
It was quite clear to me and everyone else yesterday that we weren't the ones, and never 
were going to be the ones to be protected. Thanks again to the comrades who pulled me out 
of that situation.

http://www.anarchistaffinity.org/

Related Posts: