(en) Greece, Whoever does not give everything, not given
anything (Helenio Herrera) (gr) [machine translation]
the previous fortnight had it all, except changes. ---- a referendum, which against all
predictions showed the will of the people to no longer be at the mercy of speculators and
neocolonialism. ---- a decision of parliament - and of the government to write the will of
the people in old shoes, as did all previous governments. ---- excuses corresponding to
those stammered Ioannidis after Varkiza: essentially a new Varkiza. Except of course, that
the then leftist shouldered the burden of previous generations, to release the next, while
the current left Syriza, saddled future generations with the weights of the previous
(adding to them 80 bln. Euro) to not bear the weight of its own mistakes. ---- Once again
proved, that the leaders are always less progressive than the masses. Timid, arrogant,
believing that they know more, in fact constantly afraid of the unknown, the "uncharted
waters". Quasi present in the game, able only in word and doctrine, pending a change in
the balance that will never come, mainly because of the knowledge of opposing that
ultimately will not do anything to bring. O SYRIZA, intentionally or timidity made the
same strategic mistake by ELAS in Varkiza: delivered weapons for the benefit of a tactical
advantage that will never come, after leaving the enemy the opportunity to regroup, to lay
down rules and to regain the initiative, in return for an illusion Recession, an alleged
agreement / concession that the opponent will not adhere.
In this case, most of the above, by joining in mnimoniako block xanaekane omnipotent
neoliberalism, and possibly, judging from the evolution of previous governments
mnimoniakon be opened and the way the government golden dawn.
The Tsakalotos other day he made a reference to his debate with Merkel, saying that it is
like to be Barcelona and Bayern made, and forced to play without Neymar, Messi and how
they say the other? Suarez - proves that Merkel knows football better than me.
They go horribly conclusions from this comment:
Firstly that SYRIZA was trying to dance with tied legs: it forced him none but himself
chose. when placed in reserve to pay imf and other moneylenders when agreed to discuss
with the enemy with the enemy terms.
Secondly, the naivete (?) Syriza consider (?) that it is possible an "honorable
compromise": The "creditors" do not care for mutual benefit (true is this? mutual with
whom, with the Greek people? with SYRIZA? the Government?), the aim is not to "get their
money back", their purpose is to ensure the subordination of production and our purchasing
power over the next fifty years, and to suppress any different model than his own them. As
said Glezos, it can not be an agreement between exploiter and exploited. In
correspondence, the Tsakalotos playing for the show and tickets, looking naively mutual
benefit, while Merkel to win the championship and eventually relegated team Tsakalotos.
What we then left?
To change the style of play.
Let's use the terminology of Tsakalotos.
Invoking Messi, Neymar's and Suarez terms Tsakalotos shows that perceives the "gameplay"
SYRIZA: no team, despite only three players who do not play if nothing is done.
Previously, a son anarchists émigré, the Elenio Herrera , applied another game philosophy:
the katenatsio. A team in which everyone is marked, all running, all kynigagan the ball,
all they scored. Like no names in the group: no one is above the team. The team plays to
win because that's the purpose. Employs all means. The team plays tough defense but not
defensive, six out of ten players are aggressive but they play defense. And when attack is
exponential: The opponent does not know where it will come. He does not play the ball
down, but leaves the center to the opponent, using the side-back and Libero (which is
actually aggressive) which promoted the box quickly, arriving there the same time as the
ball but regardless of this. But the most important player is the stand: It is the first
group that has organized fans who make a fuss, shout slogans have banners, make
psychological warfare the opponent, is part of the pitch, rather than external observers.
The Great Inter, edited 25 players in three years: there is no lack. The katenatsio, loved
and hated as no other football tactics in history, not because it is defensive (which is
not) as critics say, but it proved that the team wins and not the players, and why the
question is not to make the Karagiozis but to win: as telling the Nereo Rocco, "first: not
to grasp it."
In football terminology, following yesterday, we could say that SYRIZA officially joined
the shack. The left platform could call the Tsakalotos and Tsipras "coats", or perhaps
"poulitaria". Fortunately, not all had hallucinations.
Perhaps we should learn from football: we would have a lot to learn.
Firstly how not to lose. Secondly, that a draw can be equated with defeat. Thirdly, that
when a team works collectively committed to the purpose, it overcomes the need for
individual players-leaders.
And most importantly, that if you want to win, you have to give it everything.
Giorgis
http://eleftheriakoi.blogspot.fr/2015/07/blog-post.html
