(en) Turkey, DAF - Meydan #27 -June 7 DAF's Statement on the
General Elections: Democracy and Legitimacy (tr) [machine translation]
DEMOCRACY AND LEGITIMACY ---- "Terminological as a democratic state is a contradiction.
Mainly because the state domination is concerned with authority and power, and is based on
the sovereignty of compulsory social welfare inequality." ---- Michael Bakunin ---- Not
only in the electoral process in all political processes, democracy is on his agitation as
the intensity of the party. From the most liberal to the most conservative, this agitation
partnership on democracy and representative democracy, the legitimacy of the elections due
to the need. This partnership of representative democracy is the effort to create the
illusion of a real democracy. That election, is trying to do in this illusion. A victory
or defeat in elections may be over, this illusion is justified. First, unquestioned by any
cuts need to think about this error.
AN OUTSTANDING CONCEPT: DEMOCRACY
Indeed, "democracy" means and obvious ambiguity about what the social model that
corresponds expressed by these terms. The interior of the term is empty. It is
legitimizing or all such political discussions. Everything is "democracy" made for each
performance "is supported by more democratic" not promising. Perhaps the last time we face
the biggest promises and actions in the United States "to bring democracy" to Iraq is invaded.
This ambiguity is guaranteed the inviolability of representative democracy. "Take a vote
for democracy" in the whole elections with the motto benefit from this immunity. In
essence, a vote based on the equality of elections, cheating is actually a power that
creates inequality and the domination of social welfare.
In this election trick, of course, it presented as a condition sine qua non of democracy.
Everything else is either utopian or oppressive elections!
The relationship between democracy and capitalism, is another compelling reason that the
concept of ambiguity. Because capitalism determination on the governments of the emerging
power along with the globalization and the politics is increasing.
The parliamentary form of democracy that all the ambiguity, that the current political and
social structures to improve the "good state" focused. This political style, is the
negotiator and reformers.
However, we need to target the revolutionary politics, not improving the existing social
structure, and its destruction is the construction of a new social structure. A
revolutionary style to the principle of political freedom, there is no place for any
representation. Revolutionaries must take place within the scope of representation
specific to parliamentary democracy; election, political parties, the market mechanism
should participate functioning of the media and the violence associated with the device.
One way or another to take part in this mechanism, to justify it and to reproduce. As
intended by the parliamentary democracy, despite everything, it is to ensure the
sustainability of this mechanism.
DISPOSAL SHOULD NOT VOTE IN THE HISTORY OF THE OUTCOMES, IS THE HISTORY OF THE OPPRESSED
DISTRACTION
Voting rights of every individual citizen who can take decisions about their own and the
way in implementation of these decisions, that is a policy that paves the way to deliver
the representatives of their own volition. People's participation in politics only to take
a look at the evolution of the right to vote seen as a tool, it is important to understand
that hide in terms of what this operation.
The participation of sectors other than politics, nobility, showed itself in a series of
political processes from ancient Greek Magna Carta. However, equality, concepts such as
freedom and justice, after 1789 began to be associated with election issues.
Participation in politics in the ancient Greek city state "citizen" was performed by lara.
However, where the concept of citizen, not everyone in society, and covered only a minor
noble men. Women, slaves and foreigners were not considered citizens.
Roman Empire period of the previous republic, Cicero in the Senate only "management innate
predisposition that" he could enter that noble name, not the oppressed, who are prone to
be managed ...
1215 in England, the Magna Carta was owned by landlords and policy execution right to have
a say in politics. This new status as a gain in favor of the oppressed, that was owned by
noble described as the distribution of the right politics. However, changing one thing,
the landlords to share political power and was among the aristocracy.
The commercial bourgeoisie increase over two centuries of political and economic
achievements of the process, after the English Revolution, in 1688, became a partner of
political power through the House of Commons.
Developing trade, industry and the power struggle into bourgeois enriched with technology,
is decorated with liberal democracy. "Universal suffrage" is precisely the thought has
entered the agenda of the bourgeoisie at the end of such a process, the French Revolution
of 1789 as a result of universal suffrage debate began.
In 1791 that the right to vote to people with private property owners constitution was
adopted. This is taking place despite the constitutional right to vote, but it began to be
widely accepted after the 1848 Revolutions.
Against this historical process, the vote must consider the adoption of which was obtained
by fighting for the oppressed again. Oppressed, they took part in this social mobility, of
course. However, neither the political power demand in the process of the oppressed, nor
had the right to vote. Nevertheless, the bourgeoisie, freedom after seizing political
power, has pledged to provide justice and equality, after settling into power is to share
that power demonstrated at every opportunity. Revolutions in 1848 caused by the process
revolutionized the process, that would have frightened the bourgeoisie, only the diameter
of the expanded voting rights as privileges granted to private owners in 1791 and adopted
the suffrage. In fact, the bourgeoisie, this political move by the oppressed revolt to
manipulate with the ballot box and then tried to pacify this way. This move in favor of
the oppressed "progressive" and "democratic" is described as an improvement.
Despite all these "progressive" move in 1871 created the self-organization of the people
of Paris against the monarchy, the Paris Commune, neither voting rights nor representation
system was the result of an unrelated revolt.
Europe, liberal democracy "bestowed" was introduced in the mid-20th century overall
general suffrage. To note, he indicated that despite the bourgeois deception gain access
to a similar experience to that of the Paris Commune and the oppressed peoples of real
gains, but the fact that such rebellion is obtained as result.
Progressive or democratic gains because of universal suffrage, expressed understanding of
the relationship between the struggle of the oppressed, it indicates that it should not be
perceived as the two were identical.
BOURGEOIS DEMOCRACY
The relationship between the state and democracy to reveal a little more eyes, it is
useful to take a look at their thoughts on the state of Bakunin.
Baku primarily defined as a device that controls the anti-society or the elite class of
society to benefit repressive state. Basically, the state built on violence, through
political pressure is an institution interested in ensuring the continuation of this
inequality. It is based on the existence of a continuous bureaucracy. Which, rulers
governed reveals the duality.
State is a mask used to hide the fact that it is a mechanism of state domination, claiming
that it was necessary for the creation of social welfare. Manager in elections this
mechanism unimaginable away from this reality. People from a few years, who will be asked
to vote to determine whether moderate. People voting in a way that gains legitimacy
through the illusion that the system retains control of the operation of the system.
Baku, parliamentary democracy actually takes in two ways. First parliamentarism of
bourgeois democracy to mean, those holding the power in a power inevitably corrupts the
others that are on.
Baku comrades as a time where there is a parliamentary democracy the world over rarely
more have been warning about that evoke the feeling of equality among different sections
of society standing on and will create the illusion of this issue. Parliamentary democracy
prevalent in the real scam "people's self-directed" is a scam. Parliamentary democracy is
a source of speculation. Chosen by popular vote per job brought legal and administrative
structures, focusing on the representation of the popular will. Thus, in the political
process means that our freedom is denied to prevent the direct participation of the
people. Social functioning of justice and freedom, however, can be achieved with the
direct participation and control in decision-making processes of individuals. All things
considered, parliamentary democracy committed in different geographies can see where there
is a real public control and can not be.
Parliamentary democracy, trying to ignore the decisive power of revolutionary action. It
is impossible to arrive since the two sides. Because the revolutionary action managed to
destroy the social structure of parliamentary democracy, parliamentary democracy itself is
constantly aiming for "such" is trying to protect from threats.
In the early 19th century property with the "vote" through would provide the public with
promises of freedom, people turned their attention to overthrow the ruling aristocracy.
But then they did not get themselves away from the magic of power.
This together with the magic, power kavuşup those in positions of political power began to
see themselves on the society, changes in world view styles. "Even if a worker's
parliament involved in the management work becomes exploitative and domineering, the
stable aristocrat, becomes the worshipers of the parliament of the principle of
authority." Furthermore, managers, ezilenler think is chosen, even if they promise all
kinds given to voters before the manager forgets when selected, will fade in the virtual
reality of political power.
Regardless of the democratic ideas and objectives, all executives of superiority from
their virile position, the top ring looks like it did just a king's subjects. Changes in
the position of Parliamentary democracy and perspectives of managers has occurred. "
Institutionalized positions and privileges that come with these positions, hate or malice
from any individual creates a much stronger motivation. "
Political power and hegemony without sovereignty does not mean another thing. This forces
the power of the executive where two people are subservient. The presence of the Manager
will continue discomfort continues from this persecution. Administrators will also
continue to subjugate the public with more repressive measures. This is the nature of
political power. No matter how egalitarian political institutions, governing all
political, will be a balance between economic and social power and laws will be made in
accordance with this balance.
SUPPOSE HE WINS
Curve right to sit and talk. The regime could gain a majority in parliament, which is part
of part of the social opposition can not be a target like to change. Those targeting the
best of a bad, would be included in the state system and scam without realizing that they
perceive from this moment in a scam. Social opposition must be aware of the need to
maintain its presence outside of this election scam. Because there is no win in this
election. There is the thought that win. Every election Votes rising, is seen as a
success. Increase in the number of seats in parliament, "recovery" is. Social opposition,
seeing as I won the vote if the rising number of seats has been confined to his growing
success of this deception, he now social is no need to be.
The selection is based on a virtual reality scam States. There is no gain in virtual
reality. This is a curtain to look at everyone involved in the scam and are mistaken in
thinking that he achieved earnings blindness. Because there is no winning or losing in
this scam. Every time he wins deception. Economic, political and social pressures
constantly exposed oppressed also drawn into this scam by taking one vote. At their votes
with those of the oppressed pushed into thinking they can change the economic and social
position they were intended partial relief. This is exactly what the recovery scam. In the
case of deception, which will liberate the oppressed of the oppressed is not to get out of
this scam is that for whom to vote.
But already in the alt text to be included in the elections need to read well. Elections
to enter, logic thinking as the greater evil, have already started to succumb, even in
this scam. Political, economic and social power of the position of the mindset that
accepts that change, to see itself in order to survive a fall from grace, tries positioned
at an appropriate position.
Acquisition targets as laid down in the war between the powers "if what falls to us"
shaped by logic. As in the history of elections and votes do not, that the gains of the
bourgeoisie to war with the logic of the aristocracy had seen as their own achievements,
so too could the oppressed segments of the social revolution.
Want to have seized the political power to get through parliamentary elections or through
a military coup, governors and targeting because they managed to eliminate the distinction
shall act in accordance with the interests of the oppressed under any circumstances. This
move will be carried out in accordance with the periodic, temporary conditions also
created an incredibly bad olan- character who calls himself the underdog in favor of
political power as an obstacle to it.
SYRIZA REDUCES STREET
Election outcomes, reduces the street. Too many votes does it mean, not to say too many
people onto the streets. Syriza, the expectations were huge after installing ANELE
rightist government in Greece. Economic relations with the IMF, as well as to political
relations with the European Union a full liberation, pulling the rest, waiting for
liberation from the capitalist powers completely. Syriza, the last ten years in Greece,
the streets of the opposition, was seen as wastage enforcement of the demands of the
general strike.
However, the reality was far from it. SYRIZA's pasok'laş one would not think that, before
relations with the IMF and the EU, "We are against but there is also a political reality"
was spoken from the start with the principle. On the other hand, as the Russian
"anti-capitalist" state with "non-capitalist" trade and energy negotiations were done.
Everyone in domestic politics point to a solution to the economic crisis in Greece, SYRIZA
bağlamışk the waist up, Syriza government as "the best of his best" claims to do. Greece
street opposition Syriza wins with a different format. SYRIZA parliamentary solution and
hope for help from those who, even began to emphasize the necessity of SYRIZA's already
time to get to know.
However, this time to predict what the limit of detection process is not very difficult.
SYRIZA in Greece with street action, with direct action, self-management and
self-organization in a practical environment with the focus on the social revolution, is
assuming the role of indirect or direct diversion target. SYRIZA government that cuts part
of the movement in the streets before, the law would remove SYRIZA, the economy and
political policy are relying.
Just as in 1968, the street movement formed in France and Taksim Travel Resistance i
rising social opposition, such as the selection of deception intended to be channeled.
ELECTED PRESIDENT OF THE POLITICS ABOVE LOCATION
The last three years, the AKP government is carrying out the strategy for the benefit of
all the mechanisms at the same time politics is continuing successfully. Subject to
economic and political interests in the success of the AKP want to use these mechanisms as
we will be at the expense of the oppressed. At the same time the success of the AKP,
economic, using all the mechanisms of the state monopoly of violence, political and social
exploitation will ensure further increases.
AKP, on the other hand describes a new and an absolute hierarchy. Tayyip Erdogan, at the
top of this hierarchy is already trying to make the president of the de facto operating
according to the sheath.
General election, or any other obvious choices Tayyip Erdogan will undermine the current
location.
In fact Tayyip Erdogan's policy is clear in this general election will not change its
position in the hierarchy. Because it has a legal basis / of whether or somehow after this
foundation created the position Tayyip Erdogan, who follow the logic of an election to
choose and write an email legislative executive said, it is obvious that change in the
elections to choose and write an email judiciary.
Economy internal and external politics is involved in many areas of government acting
Tayyip Erdogan over this position, strengthening continues to be continued for this behavior.
Tayyip Erdogan "elected President"
It is important that highlight the persistent power of a state institution. This is a
matter of being elected president. The position between the self-justifying Tayyip
Erdogan's government institutions stands in a prominent place on chosenness.
Tayyip Erdogan emphasized that the elected president, expressed by government
spokespersons at every opportunity by bringing national will accent made; logic by
claiming that the people who they want in power are trying to establish. It is true that
within the community through the logic of the media.
But the story of being chosen is one of the most obvious tricks parliamentary democracy.
The elections "chosen" that is how to help the structuring of state power, we do not hear
from the presidents spokesperson at every opportunity? Selection created by the
"legitimacy" in this case from the point of view of the need to examine what led to good.
THE CRITICISM OF THE GENERAL ELECTIONS
Delivery will, Loss of Freedom
One of the more stand on the concept of anarchism is freedom. The loss of freedom the
essence of social injustice which anarchism put through freedom as the greatest value in
life he founded the imagination tries to embody the imagination.
The capitalist system and state in life, is based on the fully surrender of the individual
will. Who always know better, who better, better governing certain freedoms taken from
individuals by hand, this is displayed as normal. Working to normalize the situation, to
decide instead of the individuals who manage and are able to have the enforcement power,
taking power from this power.
Thought to realize that the situation is directly related to the freedom of the
individual. Will deliver in these two cases should be compulsory for freedom together, and
separated from each other realize that thinking you're thinking. Thinking job is left to
another or others.
This relationship with the political process of thinking, reasoning about how to shape the
social organization is related to whom. This reasoning represents the system work, is done
through a number of experts rather than politicians, that the people living in the region.
This may seem like a situation that creates ease in social organizations actually created,
rather than everyone, for everyone to think about the creation of a minority.
Centralized Leads to Parliamentary Elections
General elections, to a certain next elections the people living in the region, will
decide in their place, what's to say that good and what is true, there is also based on a
system will lead to no interest of the oppressed status of the decisions taken.
The electoral system the people living in the area where continued hegemony of the state,
based on the selection of managers for a certain time. We are talking about a group we
think in terms of future elections, 80 million people will prepare a five-year savings of
550 people. Heller is a sign of the determination of the minority group's future is
guaranteed by law ... anyone within the boundaries of the state hegemony and
centralization of everything that occurs is determined by minority groups.
An area of 814,578 square kilometers, is what how who needs the authority to determine
how to meet those needs is the decision of this minority group. Carefully government
programs and laws of the recommendations put forward by legislators information necessary
for the investigation and no time will never ring. Similarly, social regulation and
planning in all states is done in this way. All political and administrative functioning
of these centers is carried out with the absolute decision. Or unsustainable.
In fact, often unsustainable. Because local-specific solutions can not be evicted from the
center of decision-making. The center of political, economic or independent decisions can
not be taken out of society, the operation will be planned accordingly. These technical
deadlock today, a nation-state, is headed by giving more responsibility to local
governments to find solutions. Because existential state as a central structuring, can not
overcome this technical dilemma.
To power the choice is to Affirmation
Disposable each vote, including blank votes means affirmation of the system. We are forced
to agree to a political practice, which will be delivered to our will, there is a logic of
the voters. If we think this logic vote, always to believe that there may be a better
shepherd.
No matter how the current government acted in their own interests, if it is guaranteed by
law, the extent of this behavior, and with each election authority been thrown brazenly
uses this potential is in the hands of other interest groups. So to participate in
elections and vote independently ensures the continuation of this operation is for whom to
vote. Because of the nature of parliamentary politics, it does not show specific person or
group to change this situation. Whoever wanted more authority than the authority of this
or who serve him.
INSISTENCE ON DIRECT DEMOCRACY
Direct democracy should not be perceived as a mere organization of the procedure, which
must also be addressed in the lifestyle of the individual. Oppressors (governing), the
oppressed (managed) a life where there is no way to create distinction and relationship,
it is possible to perform already set up such a life and such relationships. The rulers of
society, beyond the state government, we are implementing the decisions taken in the
framework of democracy and representation on those who managed to show us like we're a
democracy, government is involved in this scam.
In these circumstances, direct democracy imposes itself as obligatory for us. Individuals
who are passive in social decisions throughout their lives, become active in social
decisions by direct democracy. Direct democracy, decentralized, is a method of maintaining
the operation may be included in decision-making and by adopting the principle that
everyone has the right to speak convinced that forever. Direct democracy, representative
democracy the governing parliament, politicians, centralized created by the elections and
ballots, individuals edilginleştir and the individual in the face of deception based on
the submission in its entirety will etkenleş which is a method that he receives his own
volition. Thus between ruler and ruled alike clarify ambiguity itself. That represents the
deception that participate in the management of individuals in a democracy can be
explained by direct democracy and individual conversion factor administration to a subject.
Share and relationships free full solidarity with direct democracy, then I won the
infinity of functioning decision-making processes, such representative democracy still an
important experience to reduce out the first batch of the fund by withdrawing the
ambiguity is not anything else to annihilate these values such freedom.
This we have experienced recently with the participation of the oppressed against manic
annihilate these values are Rojav Taksim Travel Rebellion and Revolution we live. Any
termination of the regime with this experience did not happen by resignation of any
government. With the participation of the oppressed and held our own in the face of this
experience will now Does the polls will tighten again will our representative democracy?
After the sharing and the power of solidarity, their lives have gotten Speaking exerted
the effort of being able to take decisions on behalf of those days again take decisions we
on behalf of the oppressed, the worst regime, we will implement these decisions on behalf
of the oppressed, we reduced Is the worst government the less bad is just a game of the
new regime and the government! This revolution and rebellion wanting to leverages the
power of ignoring the process or the party sees this process as a power exchange nasiplen
should know that, from the beginning did not understand the things that are ongoing today!
Taksim trip was organized rebellion and a new understanding that we are not accustomed
Rojav during the Revolution. Resistance and rebellion process despite the political
pressure, especially live on the streets, people resist the joy of creating and putting
slogans against. However, it experienced renewed life and how life will continue after all
of these processes and the political struggle, it was very important answer to this
problem. Because the days to come we will see with the selection of one of the most
important achievements in terms of all the oppressed of this process of direct democracy
can not understand the mentality, I always knew the methods applied, and will return
again. That the struggle for revolution and rebellion, the cracks in the life deepens;
NGOs do not understand the zihniyets volunteers, members of the party, they fall, they
fall to the polls voters call in advance. Let us not forget that the truth is lived to the
oppressed of this process: Someone or somebody you decide on our behalf, now, where we
have the power to change everything now.
REVOLUTIONARY ANARCHISTS
Revolutionary anarchists election system of parliamentary democracy, not seen as the
solution to social injustice, because;
Targeted with -Gender revolution is entirely voluntary organization consisting of a
stateless society. That is a self-organization is not difficult and not based on authority.
Individual representation based on the submission through the will of the representatives,
especially democracy, many forms of anarchism rejects democracy.
Determination of -Temsilci means to be transferred to an upper body in which it is
impossible to inspection of individual initiative. This is the negation of the actual
individual freedom.
-Game Right, it can not be used to achieve political and economic equality. Because this
is doomed to remain as a tool to support the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie.
Elections and reforms is limited space for freedom is limited by the small concessions
made by the government.
Reconstruction of the existing political legal system that internalize the "democratic
rights" by requesting the lost potential rebellion by radical opposition demand is the
quest to solve the problems through consensus.
Practices of the oppressed in the 1930s we tried to explain above, the CNT-FAI in Iberia
(National Confederation of Labour-Iberian Anarchist Federation), especially with the
self-organization of Catalonia and Aragon, across the Iberian; The Makhnovist in Ukraine's
Golya-Poly in the Free Lands experience, the Zapatista peasant organizing in South
America, we turned our faces, as in example of direct democracy and self-government, we
are trying to create the experience of direct democracy.
Today Kurdistan is taking place in the geography Rojav with the required experience to
create anarchist revolution bears similarities with the above experience. Rojava in this
process, including the public's direct decision-making, economic regions, the state with
political interests is the largest self-management experience has been undertaken against
the companies and government focus.
Revolutionary anarchists, revolutionary intent of the political process, have this
experience. There is no representation in the institutions of the state, none of this
experience. There is also the direct participation of the public and enforcement of all
decisions to be made public. All these experiences that direct democracy and
self-government implementation, "manager" is designed to prevent the emergence of class.
Selection called the political process, community politics, to understand whether the
alleged organized for social and economic needs are real, they are who or who are the
political subject of this reality, it is important to understand how they are doing what
in the activities of these political subjects.
Parliamentary system, it can not adjust itself to the electorate. Today the parliamentary
system like the capitalist system, not a trend to decrease the needs are legitimized in a
trend of increasing needs and vice versa. That is not according to the needs of the
electorate, it is legitimized by following the method of determining an endless need on
behalf of voters.
Those who believe in parliamentary democracy, when we vote using revolutionary anarchists
and "voting" when we say, we trivialized and rendered passive people saying we can
criticize political etkisizlikl to us. More than deception campaigns, stolen-burned vote,
we tell all the intrigues they accuse us siyasetsizlig extreme skepticism. If we continue
to tell the truth, it actually is seen and treated as if seen by everyone, but every
election period.
He tries to create the revolutionary anarchist political reality, state and opposite
political reality of capitalism. Therefore, to participate in the elections of
revolutionary anarchists not depoliticism is a fundamental attitude. Vote whether / not to
reduce political opposition to parliamentary democracy is a method to hide their injustice
by affirming the state.
A worker self-synchronize with the boss with a vote to give an example, this temporary
voluntary Umeda politicization of its own future actions in the thought that may result in
the usual perception of capitalism's injustices. Changing with each new election period,
not injustice; only those who will be selected and that this has always repeats itself, it
will.
Which is why the separation of political life is a separation of state and capitalism he
wants. The oppressed who faced injustice in everyday life because of this separation
remains devoid of a political attitude. Because the selection process of political
representation in a democracy is to take votes on any party.
Which is vital for political revolutionary anarchists, it is vital that political.
Individuals, in which the community itself. And not passive in the decisions to be taken
directly applicable factors. Passive not a political subject is an active political subject.
If we look at the history of anarchism in many valuable experiences from each other it has
been the case. Anarchists, operated by direct democracy in the political sphere of
decision-making, sometimes neighborhoods or public assemblies, has experienced sometimes
in co-operatives and unions. Eat with the same time into the life that they make real the
experience again. For example, the CNT is not just a trade union struggle in the political
sphere, on the vital transformation of working practices is an organization which is a
member. Revolutionary anarchists hitherto associated with social needs, self-organization
based on social, economic and political union advocated.
NOT VOTE TO BE USED AGAINST VOTING
Direct accusations for election work (they are thieves, they are liars ...) has criticized
simple. We should focus on the real reason. Because these simple criticism, criticism of
the parliamentary system being addressed by removing himself as an error to equate
politics bases do it. Besides this kind of criticism is the work of policy makers in
parliament.
One of the reasons why we call it voted in the election process is to make a call to fight
against the state. This principle is related to our opposition to the government. On the
other hand one of abstention is another reason why we call to call the struggle against
capitalism. This is related to our principle not against capitalism.
Elections us away from the concrete. We imprison unless a particular oppressed. This
process itself is an illusion altogether. Which won parliamentary democracy in place by
this illusion, its practitioners are applied in analysis of the state and capitalism, and
they express the people's talepleriymişçe. Economic and social exploitation are
legitimized by different discourses within the framework of these demands. All these
promises given during the election period is presented as a solution to this illusion
created for a while. However, the state and capitalism, injustice, except for the election
period, it will be invisible in the short-term illusion. And who believe that capitalism
should be integral to the struggle against the state we revolutionary anarchists, that is
why we will not participate in the elections and in principle we do not vote.
We do not consider the future of the revolution in the general election. On the road to
revolution elections, the "progressive" or "democratic" We hope he qualifies as a stage.
We understand the revolution is a social revolution that will create a unified struggle.
Or those in which the seats in parliament or the council of a part change is not to
determine who would sit.
To change the state constitution with different ideas and I think the current state of the
deal by promising to fix the structure from. Full enter parliament in these conditions as
well as the opposition said they would fix the business by law remind: Political higher
status, law-top applications, military and administrative bureaucracy and all similar
applications, no matter what may change no power candidate is not the case. This imposes a
requirement for all power applications because parliamentary politics seat closes.
This does not change the power struggle with the structure, it is not my area of social
revolution of the oppressed with the power of the law down from above. Where we need to
return to our faces are not the oppressed council habitats. In the organization of the
oppressed to produce a new experience that can be put in place as long as the fall of this
approach is not possible. In geography we live social revolution of self-organization in
the alleged identify immediate and long term strategies with this in mind, it should
create appropriate practices. We claim that this is a revolutionary anarchist.
ANOTHER SIDE OF THE ELECTIONS HDPE
As we emphasized in the process of local elections is the fact that for over thirty years
and who is the subject of the Kurdish freedom struggle of the people need to remember
again and again. In fact, you need to think again with Rojav Revolution process. This
political subject is the people's just struggle.
hdp'n we need to look good on the background of the plane of the moment. In the just
struggle of the Kurdish people it is obvious the effect of people's self-organization. The
losses in this struggle and tenacious struggle of thirty years of war in the process is
the source of legitimacy of the present social struggles. hdp'n political legitimacy, not
the strategy of successful politicians, Kurdish Freedom Movement to spread social impact
of the whole region and the people behind this legitimacy is based on self-organization.
Again, this is not the political legitimacy of the parliament, "terrorist" despite
labeling upgrades are based on the fight.
Today hdp'n the "progressive" or "democratic" behind the position he expressed,
manipulation and denial of state destroyed, a nation that has been destroyed by the
massacres of concrete struggles. And the first to be planted in front of a magic that will
occur in the election results, it would be the organization of the people who are fighting
against this violence mechanism from yesterday to today. It must be admitted that state;
Beyond electoral politics and a political reality that its predecessor. This political
reality is the reality of revolutionary politics. This political reality created their own
political space and carries himself in the political sphere; not in the state's politics.
Although we agree that our political reality, the state mechanism and different economic
and social interest groups, a constant in their own agendas "demilitarization" in making
emphasis indicates the hdp'y as the sole interlocutor. Moving power within their political
reality, an opposition movement wants to be limited within the framework of the political
field and shows it as a condition of democracy. Moreover, "to democracy" proposed these
terms are pronounced in an environment where the state's attacks and massacres. This shows
that the state continued to fear. The fear of state, moving out of the political arena and
is based on the existence of a social movement therefore can not control.
Principled and practical attitude in the selection process of revolutionary anarchists,
this is about is out of politics. We are advocating a revolutionary political style we
create ourselves our own political space and our process as he did every social opposition.
Role in the freedom struggle of the people throughout the history of anarchism, which
creates self-management was evident in solidarity with the people of his relationship with
the self-organization. We revolutionary anarchists, Kurdish people we are side by side in
all areas and public solidarity relations obvious, we have established the
self-organization, to hdp'y to vote or not to vote is no sense of an assessment to be made
out of the dilemma. hdp'y the voting-voting to six of the debate over the dichotomy formed
is empty.
We are in the election process, the issue of just who to vote reduce discusses exactly
speak the language of power politics and ideology anarchism unawares. The elections
revealed that anarchism; delivery of will, loss of freedom, decentralization, to affirm
the power, authority, and narrowing the scope of the reduction of social opposition and
election politics as criticism from negligible; again put the middle of anarchism "direct
democracy" principle and more recently with the choice of ignoring the indifference of
criticism of social mobility as the anarchist revolution in Rojava six empty.
Realistic talk, parliamentary democracy, as previously highlighted the "good state" goals.
Anarşizms not good government, aims to devletsizlig. within the opposition groups that
make up the hdp'y "state" of the cutting mechanism with their non-shortage of "good
government" could be targets, even this "good state" by arguing that elections can also
establish themselves. This part of the political perspectives and strategies, it is
obvious that we have affinity with the perspective and strategy of anarchists. This is
also an ideological distinction.
GAIN RECOVERABLE POLITICS
hdp'n is necessary to talk about a reality in the current location. The opposition has
long been a gain "that the success of the parliamentary seeing" a focused and at this
point exceeds the threshold hdp'n, is seen as a gain. This "earned attainment" to focus on
"realistic" to be defended with the requirements. However, it should not be ignored,
"recoverable attainment" focused social opposition is doomed to rush the ball in the area
where the state had permitted. Social opposition here meant drift; "Unrealistic" to miss
the Taksim Travel Rebellion, "unrealistic" general strike, labor courts instead of "class
struggle" to execute, May 1 in areas where the state grant "to celebrate" means. We know
that is the way the state's law has brought into the rules of injustice. That that makes
it earned mechanism to settle the injustice and act in his law does not give us anything.
In fact, if you were in favor of the oppressed who won the state did not make it recoverable.
The only political will save the oppressed, the area justified the legitimacy of street
politics. Of street politics, I think it goes without saying that means sending
politicians to the streets of the council. Is the creation of public policy that create
their own self-organization of street politics. Legitimacy of the street; oppressed area
of habitat is important to not fall into the trap opposition representation. Real gains
in terms of social opposition, should not be measured by the number of votes received at
the polls. Opposition in Greece "electoral success" precisely illustrates this fact.
Syriza, the representation trap is lost and fallen exactly where he thought he won as
mentioned above. Won hdp'n exceed the threshold by the opposition will inevitably fall
into the same error in Syriza'yl.
All this does not mean that we we prefer a dictatorial regime that reinforces the
government rather than the current situation caused by the pressure of the revolutionary
anarchist parliamentary democracy and power. It is that we are trying to emphasize;
economic and political injustices through a functioning parliamentary democracy rising and
elections are nothing but a scam and trap for the oppressed. This system of democracy and
justice under the cover of political and economic power in the position, that of the
oppressors, he established hegemony over the oppressed, is nothing more than the permanent
to destroy the freedom of the oppressed. Parliamentary democracy and elections, we refuse
to be used by the oppressed to eliminate the economic and political injustice.
Parliamentary democracy and elections, economic and political power that public enemy in
all conditions to open or hidden dictatorship, we think it would be a tool to support the
action.
Revolutionary anarchists ACTIVITIES
revolutionary anarchist activity on June 7, GE has prepared for the elections nel text.
http://meydangazetesi.org/gundem/2015/06/demokrasivemesruluk/
