France, Alternative Libertaire AL #250 - Austerity: React quickly against bad beats (fr, it, pt)

France, Alternative Libertaire AL #250 - Austerity: React
quickly against bad beats (fr, it, pt) [machine translation]

PS Political power is not only a circumstantial way to please their bosses friends. It 
also aims to delve a little deeper into the country pure liberalism juice. The conquests 
of workers and workers are threatened as never before, and it is urgent to fight for not 
finding us tomorrow with half a monthly minimum wage to cry. ---- The PS promises that the 
government does not conduct an austerity policy, but essential. The proof? This is the 
secretary of the CFDT confirmed! ---- Austerity full pot ---- Austerity has two faces. The 
most visible: higher taxes, wage freeze for civil servants in five years, blocking pension 
for three years. Or the implementation of the plan to save 50 billion Valls announced last 
year for 2014-2017. Or 18 billion savings on direct government spending and the delayed 
key jobs and broken investments; 11 billion decrease for the repayments to local 
authorities that result in clean cuts in municipal budgets or significant increases in 
local taxes; and 21 billion in spending on health and social benefits resulting for 
example the loss of 22 000 jobs in hospitals.

The other face is hidden, sneaky. That's all that concerns the dismantling of public 
services and their commercialization. For liberalism is the other name of austerity. While 
the cumulative policy Sarkozy and Holland we have not yet swallow the bitterest potions 
experienced in Greece. But the ten year reign of Sarkozy / Holland, if nothing is done to 
stop the steamroller, have profoundly reshaped the country. For employers ambitions are 
far from being met.

It is therefore urgent to make an overview of future attacks even as Macron, Minister of 
Economy, found that the French workers are too "protected" and calls on employers for wage 
moderation.

Labor Law

The Macron law still under discussion and whose vote should not take place before June - 
which allows time for mobilization to boost - so plans to reduce the rights of labor 
courts by setting ceilings and allowances introducing professional judges. The layoffs 
would be even accelerated in the procedure and subsidiaries of employees would be deprived 
of opportunities to turn against their parent or principal. Delegates in fewer than 300 
employees would be fewer companies, grouped in a single instance and required less 
frequent meetings. Mandatory annual negotiations would be simplified, consolidated and 
less frequent. Business agreements could derogate from the collective agreement without 
consulting branch of the Committee partiaire branch. Besides there will even need to 
steward to carry out these negotiations... Finally the workforce size thresholds that 
trigger today additional obligations for employers would be "relaxed." Sunday work and 
night would be commonplace. At the same time labor inspectors see their cropped missions 
and under supervision of a supervisor and will always have less time to accomplish their 
missions.

Flexible CDI

The government still hesitate to attack head-on the CDI, accused of preventing employers 
to hire. With more than 5 million unemployed, who can still dare to declare that it is 
difficult to dismiss in France? Several avenues are open to discreetly disappear CDI. 
Progressive CDI (which turns into a real CDI that after four years) seems to be ruled out: 
too conspicuous. And the mobilization of youth against the CPE is in everyone's memory. 
Instead, the government is working on flexible and secure CDI: as for vocational training 
whose meager grandfathering now follow the employee to business changes, would follow 
other elements such as the basic welfare and rights to unemployment, points arduousness 
account. With these "security" employees should enjoy the removal of any protection 
against dismissal that would become virtually painless... The idea comes from the 
"slingers" PS, ie if it is left!

In "arduous"

The famous account "hardship" is still not really in place and taking into account all the 
criteria is suspended. The law had to meet CFDT brandishing the "advanced" in exchange 
setbacks that it has accepted the retirement rights for all. But the bosses who denounce 
an inapplicable gas plant are not wrong. Taking into account the timed exposure of each 
employee in a dozen painful factors (noise, night, cold...) is almost unenforceable. 
Therefore Rebsamen, Minister of Labour, multiplies the effects of ads before the Congress 
employer federations denouncing the gasworks and promising simplification. Alas, we can 
doubt that in fact it is a simplification of burial that the government is preparing 
quietly to his friends of the CFDT...

Supplementary pensions

Supplementary pensions, Arrco contributions for employees and AGIRC for executives, are in 
the red. Fewer contributors and retirees, you know the chorus and logic seems 
relentless... The issue is important because, as appropriate, this retreat, which 
complements the basic pension paid by Social Security, represents 30% 50% of the total 
pension. The bosses have essentially two proposals on the table and did not move, but the 
margin will be held after the third negotiation meeting with trade union confederations. 
On the one hand a drastic decline in survivors' pensions (which is donated to the widow, 
means-tested, after the beneficiary's death; the system also works for widows but the 
cases are rare).

On the other hand a discount between 62 and 67 years with a gradual rise to a full pension 
at 67 years only. This measure would be a springboard for a decline to 67 years of 
retirement for the general scheme. The only setbacks Medef to date focus on the regression 
rate and the year of application: native 1956, 1957, 1958?

Before the summer holidays

All these negotiations and those under development laws are supposed to be completed 
before the parliamentary recess, around mid-July. They fully justify a massive movement of 
farm strike and determined without which, with some nuances, they will become our new 
standards. A day will not be enough, for sure. Now that you are warned, for you to see...

Jean-Yves (G 93)

http://www.alternativelibertaire.org/?Austerite-Reagir-vite-contre-les