WSM.ie (DABF) - The Fight Against the Water Charges - Where Next? - Contribution to DABF 2015 Panel with Video by Gregor Kerr

(en) WSM.ie (DABF) - The Fight Against the Water Charges -
Where Next? - Contribution to DABF 2015 Panel with Video by Gregor
Kerr

Can we turn the water charge movements away from the self-destruction of taking the 
electoral route, can we convince people in large numbers that it is on the streets and in 
conversations with their neighbours that the battle will be won not in the ballot box? 
---- Over the coming months we need to solidify the message of the twin direct action 
tactics of blocking meter installation and not paying the bills – the message of people 
seeing themselves as leaders in their communities in terms of having that conversation – 
‘I’m Not paying. You Shouldn’t Pay’ – retaining the many headed monster and avoiding the 
false ‘unity’ that involves leadership from above being imposed on self-organising 
community campaigns ---- In addressing the question of ‘where next?’ for the anti water 
charges campaign it is useful to start with a quick look at where it currently is, where 
it has come from, and what have been the key influences inn its development.

And in kicking that off it is also useful to remind ourselves that a year ago it wasn’t 
anywhere – it didn’t exist to any appreciable extent. A couple of factors have combined 
to help it become the biggest campaign against any of the austerity measures visited on us 
over the last 7 or 8 years and to have organised some of the biggest mass mobilisations in 
the history of the state.

Principal among those factors has been the initial example shown by a small number of 
activists in a small number of communities in Cork and in North East Dublin in using 
direct action tactics to prevent the installation of meters, the use of social media – 
facebook in particular – to spread that example which has since been taken up, copied and 
repeated all over the country.

And alongside that the fact that 5 significant trade unions affiliated to the national 
Right 2 Water body gave it a wider mass appeal than any previous campaign – such as the 
Campaign Against Household and Water Taxes and the earlier anti bin tax campaign which 
were largely fronted by the left parties and politicians.

Having said that, I would argue that the thing that marks the anti water charges campaign 
out as being completely different from any of the previous anti-austerity campaigns (or 
lack of them!) is that it has managed to draw into activity a huge layer of working class 
people who are not members of political organisations, many of whom have never been 
involved in campaigns before and who don’t necessarily look to the trade union movement – 
and certainly not the left parties – for direction. .

I don’t think it’s particularly useful to talk about THE campaign against water charges 
because there is no one campaign. It’s more helpful perhaps to think about it as a 
movement, a many headed monster if you like. This lack of cohesion – this lack of a 
single entity that is ‘the campaign’ is a huge strength – it means that there is no one 
‘movement’ or ‘campaign’ which can be co-opted or beheaded, there is no one leadership 
which can be bought off, cosied up to or defeated.

While most of the massive protests have been called under the Right2Water umbrella, many 
local campaigns don’t have any involvement in Right2Water other than to participate in 
those protests. They don’t look to Right2Water for leadership, they don’t wait for 
Right2Water to tell them what to do. Indeed even many local campaign groups which call 
themselves Right2Water do not look to or seek leadership from Right2Water as a national body.

The local area in which I have been playing a small part in assisting in the building of 
resistance to water meter installation and the building of the political confidence 
necessary to convince large numbers of people not to pay is Dun Laoghaire. Any of you 
that know the area will know that the greater Dun Laogahire area has a mix of very wealthy 
areas, mixed working class areas and poorer areas.

Our campaigning in that area has really only kicked off since Christmas. During the 
months of January and February a small number of community campaigners organised in the 
region of 25 – 30 community street meetings over which had an average attendance of 
between 20 and 30 people. From these meetings, local phone trees and contact lists were 
organised and communities in any of the areas where these meetings have been held have 
successfully resisted the installation of meters in their areas.

A small but very active bunch of water warriors have been participating in direct action 
protests to prevent meter installation on a daily basis. When installation has been 
attempted in Council estates and more working class areas, there has been tremendous 
support and involvement from local residents. In other areas, the reaction of residents 
has been mixed to say the least. But the group’s decision has been that in terms of 
defeating the charges and privatisation, every meter delayed or prevented is a victory.

The relationship of our local community campaign to the Right2Water group which exists 
locally is the same as our relationship with the national R2W ‘umbrella’. We participate 
in protests and public meetings organised by them but we do not see ourselves as ‘part of’ 
R2W.

That’s what I see replicated across Dublin and throughout the country - the emergence of a 
layer of activists, many of whom have never done so before getting involved in community 
organising and in turning almost instinctively to the tactic of non-violent direct action 
as being the most effective way to prevent meter installation.

The emergence of this layer is something that should really excite those of us interested 
in anarchist and libertarian politics and equally should be a worry for the trade union 
leadership and the established left parties just as much as it worries the government and 
right wing parties.

People are organising outside of the party structures and outside of the trade union 
movement, they are learning that we don’t need ‘leaders’ or people to do things for us or 
think for us. They are learning that we are all capable of thinking for ourselves and of 
doing things for ourselves. They are learning that organised together in our communities 
we are strong and capable of standing up to injustice. And when working class people learn 
those lessons, they don’t meekly go back to the game of ‘follow the leader’ or ‘vote for 
me to bring about change’.

That is not to say that what is emerging is about to overthrow capitalism – far from it. 
But what is emerging is a new audience willing to engage with and listen to new ideas. 
They’re an audience that to a great extent have rejected the failed politics of the past.

What is obvious is that the existing left have no idea how to engage with these layers of 
people. A working class organising itself is a worry for them, working class protesters 
who don’t follow the ‘rules’ of protest and who don’t look to political leaders for 
guidance are coming up against a left whose idea of political dialogue is that people 
listen to their ideas, a left which doesn’t have the ability to listen to people, 
acknowledge their ideas and engage with them from where they are at.

The challenge for those of us steeped in libertarian and anarchist politics is to do that 
reaching out, to embrace, to listen, to work alongside and to support and encourage this 
layer of activists.
The big danger of course is that much of the energy and enthusiasm will be diverted down 
the electoral cul de sac.

R2W refuses to endorse or call for the only tactic actually capable of ultimately 
defeating the charges – non-payment. Taking the movement down the electoral route involves 
disarming a people who are beginning to find their voice in terms of how they relate to 
'politics'. It involves telling those who have stood in front of diggers and prevented 
meter installation, who have organised in their communities, who have marched and 
protested in their tens of thousands that 'someone else' will solve their problem, that 
all that is necessary to get rid of water charges is to have 'the right people' in power.

The message people need to hear right now is that it is as a result of working class 
people organising and protesting and uniting with each other that the government is under 
pressure. And that the ultimate weapon at our disposal - refusal to pay - will defeat the 
charge. It doesn't matter who's in government, by standing with our neighbours and 
refusing to pay, the charge is unenforceable.

So to me that’s the big challenge - can we turn the movements away from the 
self-destruction of taking the electoral route, can we convince people in large numbers 
that it is on the streets and in conversations with their neighbours that the battle will 
be won not in the ballot box? Over the coming months we need to solidify the message of 
the twin direct action tactics of blocking meter installation and not paying the bills – 
the message of people seeing themselves as leaders in their communities in terms of having 
that conversation – ‘I’m Not paying. You Shouldn’t Pay’ – retaining the many headed 
monster and avoiding the false ‘unity’ that involves leadership from above being imposed 
on self-organising community campaigns"

This text is the notes of the talk Gregor Kerr gave to the ‘The Fight Against the Water 
Charges - Where Next?’ panel at the 2015 Dublin Anarchist Bookfair April 25 2015