(en) Turkey, DAF - Meydan #26 - "Injustice for Men Women
Men's Heritage" - Zeynep big (tr) [machine translation]
I recently ECE Erdogan's daughter also Kadee's (Women and Democracy Association)
Vice-President Mohamed Erdogan, the AK Party in Brussels Political Academy, "the world
Muslim women's perceptions and equality struggle" gave a lesson. Not gender equality in
the speech, Erdogan, indicating that gender justice advocates, also referred to the
heritage. Mentioning the male breadwinner household responsibilities, the same
responsibilities that women, thus said that the justice of men more heritage fall.
Position mentioning the justice of those who defend justice, injustice must have been at
the center of an irony in itself! ---- Well, as the legacy of Mohamed Erdogan said, more
men than women drop really fair sturdy? Or, as mentioned in Islam, women from both
parents, the share of both men will be married; obliged to ensure the livelihood of women
and men, compared to women in inheritance Should owned more shares?
This question or these "problems" are you different channels of discussion in this paper,
we stopped on our heritage, to whom not be less or more falls. On the contrary, these
debates are ignoring the real position of women, discussions reap the position they have
men over women. We article, we will talk about the arch-property relations between men and
women, and true justice, to every subject in the patriarchal system Revisions heritage
lost in the debate as we talk about female identity.
Moral Legacy: Marriage
Heritage significance of the property, the property means sharing in marriage. From past
to present all legal marriages actually done to ensure social morality of the woman. Thus,
women's moral core to the father in the family, entrusted to men who were married through
marriage. Marriage in every sense "faithful" women are rewarded with the state's so-called
laws.
In 1907 the way from Switzerland to the 1926 Republican fan stop in the West, women
certain rights laws that have come as a legacy of civilization. State the application of
these laws in practice for many years, when it comes to 2001, near misses to go through
the eyes of the west are hastily rearranged. Many times changed -Renewable the "very
civilized" most of the law "equality" is glorified. In observance of the same equality in
sharing that heritage property debate will equate the so-called men and women. Changes
made in 2002, "family law" under the name "passes also said women at home as much as
men", "decision-making authority and maintenance obligations are as many women as men,"
"represents the marital union of the common" with substances such as "equitable" may seem
to change the oppressed position of women no to no avail.
If in 2011 the state in terms seen as a milestone opened the Council of Europe by signing
in Istanbul, thus the name of the Istanbul Convention as a matter of contract aimed at the
prevention of violence against women dig our memory recall is necessary to remind some of
the increased 1400 percent in the last 4 years of women's murders.
For example in cases where the law has been disengaged, the "unofficial" The position of
women in a marriage "immorality" is seen as. When men and women or women and men is
abandoned for any reason whatsoever from anyone with no legal means "account does not
ask". By female society "immorality" stigma is, moreover, by the man she was with
"unlawfully" punishable. So death malleable, disposable street, you can be banned from
children, etc. Men do not lose anything from the location, it is not part of the
relationship is no longer corrupt the contrary. If the marriage in community of women
considered to be a moral heritage of the middle informal marriage born children if, for
example, the law is a single name owes to the child in order to clear this immorality,
children not expect the adoption of the boy with the unborn if the notary's signature, in
the eyes of society they share the same fate with their mother, unfortunately, they are
labeled with the pejorative adjective.
Crowning marriage women say! Especially in kutsallaştırılıp community capacity motherhood
"special" to feel we can not leave marriages often we become. On the other hand, ignoring
the spiritual sense only if they are seen as an economic salvation marriage, similar to
the boss-employee relationship, until the forces of our tolerance limit. Nowadays we are
witnessing often called the marriage contract in advance guaranteeing men and women
sharing the property "economic efforts" is explained by one thing; "Purely economic".
Apparently our heads is that marriage is like a chain is not nearly up our crown.
Even in marriage on television programs, most women home, car, bank with money and
childless men prefer to choose a spouse. This property searches, just the lack of
admiration for the wealth of the poor woman or a woman nebzecik relief request? Today,
presenting marriage as a response to all these questions very clearly outlines the
position of women in society, even to us, actually.
Women marriage, both social and oppressed in every aspect of a relationship based on
economic ownership emerges. The forced marriage with a dowry name in exchange for three
oxen, I do not know how many acres men who enriched the woman stepped onto the woman
stepped on the rise in male society enriched by taking off the woman home service free for
years. On the other hand the patriarchal system, the processing loop the loop on the minds
of young men whose birth and when they grow "immoral" legacy they leave, including the
woman's male justice injustice.
The Labor Heritage: Poverty
E vlilikl home closed by the economic gains women have to ensure that the vital needs of
all men. This woman is not only a poor life, a life devoid of the outside world brings
with it. Women's poverty before marriage, after marriage, takes the stage as after a
divorce. Considered the only economic savings for married women in the family before the
"dowry", gained the day of the wedding ceremony of marriage "jewelry" a little after
marriage "alimony" is.
The situation is similar for all women working outside the home. Women's labor is
mentioned first from the "invisible labor" is. Both at home and at work, male g eg
unskilled, easily seen, trapping all the jobs women oppressed position. When he returned
home from work at home jobs working women, the oppression continues to work as child care.
Women so poor as to bring the patriarchal society and forced to take a deprived life.
Deadly Legacy: Femininity
Sex and gender are different. Gender, women and men possess the innate biological
differences, and gender as a cultural product, social stratification resulting from the
roles between men and women is socially built. Gender, identifying individuals behaviors,
how to make them the ideal man or woman is an ideal teaching with specific norms and
patterns. Creating a male and female identities leads to uniformization.
Gender roles gives people a variety of responsibilities. Character of the people,
emotions, feelings, desires, motivations, formed in accordance with the discourses of
society and life experiences teach. Therefore, people who have converted to another
character are completely different people by society. This process of social values and
listen even more justified.
Gender status determines the definition of women and men. This defines the framework in
which men and women wear dresses, shaping their bodies and how they should have names
which are clear. These two genders as well as established print women shoulder a heavy
burden on the bin. man in society, is active in subject. Make money as a result, the
family economy improvement, such as being able to be men özdeştiril responsibilities. The
woman is a character driven society. Passive position brought the child to look at the
woman's responsibility, do housework, and the social role, passive, motherly,
compassionate, to be sensitive and obedient. These responsibilities than men over women
builds more pressure. Because in every area of life based on the roles of women and men
are more passive is designed to serve men and women. This is not different from each other
should be required in business in the home.
Women, almost all of these social responsibilities and roles is their identity. The loss
of the woman's identity and remains a deadly legacy of women transformed in character
shaping society; "Femininity".
Patriarchy Heritage: Injustice
"Men" to be, "femininity" as defined in any kind of reality, emotion and behavior is based
on the wholesale denial. "Feminine" should not allow any property defined as. Expected in
society "masculinity" display formats or third person if they accept, they are labeled as
vague and ill sexes. Because ideal "male" to be desired in the community "male" or
"female" is.
Biological hegemonic masculinity which is outside the masculinity of men in society is
shaped accordingly, is a discourse will compete for it. In this sense, can not maintain
the properties, it is considered unable to protect every man suspected of masculinity.
Masculinity in society "fertilising, protective and geçindiric the" characteristics of the
regenerated each time and continued. A "certificate of masculinity" as seen circumcision,
still regarded as one of the military men and masculinity that is the extent of their role
in the preparation of the "man" should be. For example, circumcision itself around those
proved to be of little men, soldiers and sultans under clothes "man" is not that guy. Them
to acquire the entire experience of a man, to be acquainted with the good and bad, is
expected to comment on them. Because then the cock of their set, they will be military and
protector. All the rituals of manhood and in the community who do not know this does not
count the man's life, honor killings, massacres why the family is not always required us
to ask that the work of men.
Masculinity is endless competition and a personal war. Women's domestic life if not a war,
a defense, not to prove himself process is a protection process. If a woman fails to
protect the female form of humiliation to expect from society itself and that is confined
to a negation of femininity. Men by the society fails to protect the masculinity "eunuch"
welcome. patriarchy and women must be rejected for both men. However, once a "eunuch" is
afraid of being men, they continue to live by this scheme will never change no woman at
all times. The legacy left by the culture of patriarchy and violence against women will
return to the massacres.
Denial of Heritage
We live in the heritage of men to women in the world not only property is a living also
stolen. All laws enacted to ensure equality and justice for women supposedly served to men
until today. Possible to improve the position of women within the State that "disease"
treat "disease" is much easier to eliminate. So you need to eliminate every area of
society "disease" has always been a woman is seen as. Today different media in gender
equality or who discuss the gender justice, women's lost identity and avoid poverty and
injustice voiced from persistently. Because they virilization.
In the world we live we have a single case will be for women; Our freedom case. In this
case, the court rejected the state's ownership of the relationship between men and women
is not at the gates of the palace, putting against injustice, denial of patriarchy
heritage saying we can win. When men die partnership ends, we may have to live in a free
stays back when some property but died masculinity. And there is nothing left to be left
behind when they can only achieve our freedom.
Zeynep big
zkocaman@meydangazetesi.org
http://meydangazetesi.org/gundem/2015/04/erkegin-mirasi-erkege-adaletsizligi-kadina-zeynep-kocaman/
