(en) France, Alternative Libertaire AL #245 - Unionism: There was once social thresholds (fr, it, pt)

(en) France, Alternative Libertaire AL #245 - Unionism: There
was once social thresholds (fr, it, pt) [machine translation]

A new "negotiation" National Inter-opened around the "social dialogue" in the company, 
with the common goal posted by employers, government and the accompanying unions: breaking 
the labor code to "simplify" the business life. In the game, the staff thresholds beyond 
which must be created of representative bodies. ---- In companies, the obligation to 
establish representative institutions is triggered depending on staffing levels. The 
first, from eleven employee-es requires the election of delegates Personnel (DP). This is 
an achievement earned in 1936 following lengthy strikes which allows for delegates bearing 
the individual and collective claims. These delegates proximity are essential-the-s for 
union activity and the construction of collective militants. They are the ones who best 
know the reality of the business, which are often in contact with the employee-es, which 
are legitimate in their eyes. DP meetings are often brought by employers in discussions 
that are "related" or "secondary" by discrediting this mandate: it is no coincidence.

From 50 employee-es, the company must establish a works committee (EC), working conquest 
postwar allowing to operate a power-cons in the company through the control of its general 
course and organizing social and cultural activities related to the individual and 
collective emancipation. Broadly, these bodies, with the CHSCT (committee on health, 
safety and working conditions) set up as soon as EC exists, allow the existence of a trade 
union activity and organization a balance of forces facing the direction even if the 
rights are insufficient.

Parody of negotiations

The umpteenth parody of negotiations that opens at national level, which will bring a lot 
of social regression after the law called "secure employment" is based on a rather 
simplistic thinking pattern. These obligations are, according to the employers, a brake on 
employment and hiring. As in 1986 with the removal of the administrative authorization for 
dismissal obtained under a government that has the same label today, the results in terms 
of employment are obviously not related. Delete "obligations" are rights for employee-es 
is not the solution to the unemployment conclusively nor acceptable as a social project, 
why not eliminate overtime pay? Redo children work? Where is the limit set by employers to 
consider the achievements of social progress are to destroy to gain flexibility?

The only logic that guides his choice is very clear. By challenging the thresholds, the 
capitalists do not want one thing: suppress union activity or at best relegate far, far 
away from the company into a technocratic issue between disconnected specialists clash 
class everyday.

Additional rights to win

The positioning of the accompanying unions is not a surprise, since all are ready to 
monetize serious concessions at the expense of employee-es in exchange for social 
recognition for their leaders, posts and 'recovery' of the militant path. However, the 
position of the CGT, announced recently has something to question. It is betting on close 
positioning of the CFDT but "far left", giving the option to remove the DP in exchange for 
joint territorial commissions, or of delegates elected representatives at local level.

Delegates staff is essential and not allowing their removal that will strengthen trade 
union activity. Today, it is the question of the actual additional rights that must be 
asked: creation and widespread inter-company EC on a labor pool (eg shopping centers), 
additional protection of delegates, building collective agreements to allow for upward 
harmonization in the same industry regardless of the business, employee status, the EC 
veto against job cuts... Unionism must have the means and tools to allow expression of 
employee-es and enforce their decisions.

Strengthening trade union presence and develop remain the best responses to provocations 
of the employers and the government. These representative institutions are one of the 
foundations of social democracy: defending them!

RoberK (AL Montreuil)

http://www.alternativelibertaire.org/?Syndicalisme-Il-etait-une-fois-les