(en) Anarkismo.net: Predictive Analysis for the national
political scene in 2015 by BrunoL (it, pt) [machine translation]
Unlike most of the posts of this portal and its shares, this time this analyst is given
the right to be 100% legal. I propose a normative type of analysis (should be), from the
point of view of who stands by the advance of democracy at all levels, with the most
organized as a collective agent with veto power on the typical vertical decisions of a
society where no although there is no social justice formal equal rights. The time is
really serious on the model of the late Keynesianism shy crisis, kicking located in the
neo-liberal assumptions, defenders of astronomical profits from rent-seeking (allocating
more than 40% of the EU budget only with the scroll interest of odious debt) and starting
directly to the cutting of social rights and, by extension, the volume of credit and
living conditions.
In this charge the synthesis of an urgent political need beyond the farce of the
"positions of game" and beyond the ballot box of indirect democracy.
The first finding is the need to rely only on their own forces. So the question is: "We
who?". Who was this cluster of political and social forces to be fully or partially bonded
from 2015, taking advantage that this is not an election year? I bet what we can say as
just relying on our own strength. In this sense, wanted to see the rest left (so that no
illusions with the right-wing government) have some degree of unity beyond the ballot box;
ideally a unit in trade union with proper coordination in popular and student level;
Although this angle, it would be interesting to see a definitive split us even combative
sectors in the Brazilian social movement such as MST, MTST and others, especially the Via
Campesina, which mistakenly still harbor some hope in the coalition government. In ideal
condition such sectors are ally themselves with no conditions - the social level - with
the trade union unity (even non-existent) and popular, with a reasonable degree of
solidarity. You need to anticipate this approach, before the left that still stands to the
left in the PT (yes, there are people who still says "left" in the legend of Jos? Dirceu),
take charge in events such as the Forum 21 (held in S?o Paulo on December 15, 2014), to
seek tactical unit against neoliberal restoration, reinforcing the absurd idea of
"government in dispute".
Again, the engine of all this would be the mass Right to the City, as in 2013, and without
fact-generator of the Confederations Cup as a backdrop. Has a lot of disorganized people
on the metropolitan Brazil and we need political and social referents to unite these
people, collectives and networks small. Who convene a drive will come out ahead, even
recognizing the realities are very different capital and metropolitan areas. We have
political subsystems radicalized left and social groups with medium or low degree of
radicalization, but always with urgent and organizing themes. Unite these direct and
structural interests beyond the farce of "position game" although we have in Brazil a
social working condition can dispense entirely some sort of sympathetic relationship
within the state apparatus in its three levels of government.
Going beyond prediction, progress must be urgent in recognition of public policies and
founding rights of diversity, leaving no room either for liberals and neo-conservatives,
such as neo-Pentecostal, squalid ? la Brazilian and nostalgic of April 1 strike. It's time
for zero tolerance for any kind of intolerance, beginning with the immediate recognition
of the causes of Indigenous and Maroon people. This guides the direct confrontation with
the central government forces and those who are protagonists or supporters of these causes
to position themselves against the projects of the center-right coalition re-elected in
October.
In conclusion, this analyst believes that the time has come to maturity and recognition of
CAB and diffuse libertarian thought running through the new left post Lulism in Brazil.
It's time to take on this role with responsibility and forcefulness to generate a
reference for all emergencies that never fit in the polls of indirect democracy.
http://www.anarkismo.net/article/27774
