[machine translation]
Introduction ---- This week, we see more harmful consequences of 3rd Shift and the
government of the myth in dispute. How often is the left whose urgencies never fit in the
polls of indirect democracy is more than correct. The manifesto of intellectuals,
activists, collectives and individuals who coalesce around the ideas of the portal Carta
Maior (11/24/14) expressed a correct indignation of those who supported the candidacy of
Dilma, rallied to the tight 2nd round and now see before the election embezzlement. ----
The former guerrilla, former union leader who, according to their left and never out of
the eternal Chicago Boy, straight from Milton Friedman to hosts, under the blessing of
L?zaro Brand?o, rule the 7th economy in the world. To the deluded mass of the "ideological
vote"
Text published on the portal and a permanent collection of electronic signatures, who
disputes the summit decisions calls the bases of support the re-election of Dilma simply
force it to fulfill its promises and campaign promises! In writing in this regard may seem
provocation or sectarianism, but when the very left that still supports the coalition
government that analyzes the below mentioned are a clear shift to the right is because we
are in an open and triggered battlefield.
For those who do not believe in government in dispute (such as this analyst), understand
that it is the right time to claim a new form of accumulation of forces, beyond the
embarrassment of PT who is still and has conduct and reivindic?vel trajectory. I selected
this snippet of text below the manifesto, because I believe it is illustrative. The clash
is just beginning and the third shift apparently going to be a long-term peleia, even
tougher than the second turn.
"In the third round that is at stake, the elected president seems to take more account of
the forces whose representative defeated than dialogue with the forces that elected.
Rumors of Joaquim Levy and Katia Abreu indication for the Ministry signal a regression of
the victorious schedule at the polls. Both are known for conservative and exclusive
solution of the fiscal problem and the systematic defense of the landowners against the
environment and the rights of workers and indigenous communities.
Government proposals were clearly announced in the presidential campaign and pointed to
the expansion of workers' rights and not to social regression. Civil society can not be
surprised after the elections and have the right to actively participate in defining the
direction that elected government. "
It must be fair to Dilma. Never in time she or Lula or campaign coordination have
committed to consultation mechanisms, even if indirect, to civil society mobilized for his
re-election. In the absence of institutional mechanisms to enhance popular sovereignty,
the only way to be heard is the pressure of the streets, making left opposition to this
same government that those to sign the manifesto helped elect.
More than institutionalized blackmail the PMDB, PP and other "allies"
Over the last two weeks before Dilma put Levy and Nelson Barbs, in addition to continuing
Alexandre Tombini as a de facto situation, there was a rebellion principle of "allies".
The government coalition works at a slow pace while preparing the siege inside. The chiefs
did not vote to change the primary surplus target (on two occasions), vote that it was
precisely the Planalto maneuver to avoid embarrassment to the new holders of the economic
folders to take. On the agendas of the big newspapers, much has been said about it and, as
always, missing someone question the fanciful primary surplus, which operates as a state
certification obedient to international speculators.
We're hitting targets in the 1999 crash yet! And in the weeks that follow, gives plenty of
time for the base "ruling" reduce the room for maneuver of the re-elected president.
Holders of joint second Dilma government, Mercadante, Miguel Rossetto and Jaques Wagner,
will apply the expertise on the inner left to try to tame the voracious appetite of the
coalition. What to mate career.
Dilma, Levy and crazy theory of government in "dispute"
The speech of Joaquim Levy, Minister of the second government of Dilma Finance and
indicated by Bradesco when the refusal of Luiz Carlos Trabuco, another executive of the
financial services conglomerate led by L?zaro Brand?o, brings monetarist type of elements
and would point a setback. This statement is Breno Altman, Opera Mundi portal editor (good
source of international politics) and to support the text that had come in the Greater
Charter (on 28/11/14), the specialist world of publishing points in some irrefutable data.
- March 2013 to October 2014, the Selic jumped 7.25% to 11.25% per year.
- Increased financial income of twenty thousand families control 70% of domestic debt
securities. But deteriorated public accounts: four points more in interest mean extra
annual spending around ? 120 billion.
What is in doubt is how long the PT sectors that still have some belief system on the
popular role or at least some kind of preferential option for the sovereignty and direct
employment, will follow with the crazy theory (or justification) of "government in dispute "?!
Levy and the Pyrrhic victory of the "left"
Now, to the delight of the conservative media and their political and economic analysts,
the government continued Lulism gives the basis for the assertion of electoral larceny.
The Merval Pereira argument reproduces the same assertion Bolivar Lamounier, the victory
in the polls of sync with the political victory - or the lack of legitimacy as more
important than the legality of the election. Let's look below:
"What these people do not want to see, and that Rousseff was forced to understand, is that
the electoral victory of the PT in October did not correspond to a political victory
because it forged the base of the abuse of public and lies machine, are those disclosed by
advertising election, or scattered in various forms across the country to scare the less
informed. " (Blog Merval, in the O Globo website, on 11/28/14).
That is, on the one hand we have symbolic betrayal of Dilma - programmatic betrayal
because we have to admit that it was not - the other, the third part features a legitimacy
withdrawal of intent, from the published opinion (if widespread, distributed) and the
defense of rights (both UDN coup as pointing Aetius as the national Capriles).
On the one hand bothered to operators recruited to manage the economy in the second Dilma
mandate the manifest modest signed by about 4930 people by the end of this analysis, on
the other, there was a sense of Pyrrhic victory for those who signed the text of claims
and saw all ties built by Lula and Palocci in the first term - when the very Levy served
as secretary of the National Treasury - return less than a month after the victory at the
polls.
What economic right wants - love - would be an insulation of economic folders, creating a
real theoretical linked authority and strategically to major economic actors, with special
predilection for financial capital.
Conclusion
Even lucid part of the Financial Times recognizes: the European extreme left is right
about the impossibility of payment of odious debt
This is the paradox. Even the Financial Times (in Wolfgang M?nchau article on 11/23/14)
admitted that we are right about the folly of government debt. The Globonews surprisingly
(on 25/11/14) gave the profile of the Brazilian public debt and this has more than 60% of
its composition of Brazilian securities holders made up of banks, investment funds (panic,
the hedge funds such! ) and, guess what, foreign buyers. Only Brazil pays 11.25% per year,
the global average of hits 1 point when it comes 2 the financial casino celebrates. Here
the debt is sinking public investment. Ironically, it is clear that the re-elected former
militants are right painful awareness of that columnist FT.
From: http://www.anarkismo.net/article/27669
