(en) France, Alternative Libertaire AL #243 - Read: Alain Bihr and Roland Pfefferkorn "Dictionary of inequality" (fr, pt)


[machine translation]

Over 400 pages and 500 entries written by 215 scholars in the humanities and social 
sciences (sociology, economics, philosophy and law, geography and statistics, ethnology 
and anthropology, and even in medicine and mathematics): the dictionary written under the 
direction of Alain Bihr and Roland Pfefferkorn inequality seems particularly well equipped 
to rule on the issue. ---- It turns out that already the first dictionary of its kind (one 
might even approach the dictionary dominions of collective Manouchian published in 2012 in 
Syllepse). It is also found that the book was written to meet a dual principle of 
multidimensionality and multi-disciplinary. In other words, the analysis of social 
inequality requires the mobilization of work from several distinct fields of scientific 
research. And study their application to be covered in all fields of practical expression.

Inequalities between social classes and between sexes (or gender), Inequalities (or age 
classes) and socio-spatial inequalities, inequalities between racialized groups (or 
between nationalities within a state) as inequalities between groups of states worldwide: 
examining inequalities induced necessarily by this double orientation multidimensional and 
multidisciplinary, international perspective may attest to the structural coherence of 
neoliberal policies exerted in the South as in the North (of where the existence of 
geographical entries such as "Brazil", "China" and "India").

This consistency allows finally to understand the systemic inequalities that, despite 
their specificity that is obviously not to deny, interact with each other to the point of 
co-production and determine mutually and reciprocally. As such, it will then immediately 
see the entry "intersectionality" written by the philosopher Elsa Dorlin. This concept, 
proposed in the late 1980s by the US lawyer Kimberl? from Crenshaw and authoritative 
within gender studies, suggests the "relationship between power relations" (p. 207) 
describing precisely the situation people simultaneously undergoing various forms of 
domination. Alain Bihr and Roland Pfefferkorn expose clearly in the introductory 
presentation to their dictionary: context governing the composition of their work fits 
into the "wave of neoliberal policies," which have helped to break the back of (p. 5) 
Southern countries from the former third world victims of structural adjustment programs 
planned by the World Bank and the IMF, to ruin the command economy of the Soviet States 
suddenly converted to wild capitalism and weaken social protection policies torn High 
struggle in the North in the name of deregulation of capital and market deregulation.

But it is also a result of social regression caused by neoliberalism that the symbolic 
hegemony understanding of inequality only Marxist prism of social classes has been 
questioned on behalf of the advent of new political subjects of contestation desirous 
'complexity in the problem. This means that the problem of inequality can not be 
recognized without the discussions that exist as an object of scientific knowledge and 
control objectives as social movements do. There would be definitely no consensus in the 
analysis of inequality, since already calling the questioning of power relations, it also 
requires collective actors involved to discuss their respective specificity, without 
underestimating any of their interactions or their intersections. From this point of view 
there could be identified via the entry "anarchism," written by Irene Pereira this 
multiplicity of forms of domination from a generic section and radical critique of 
hierarchical authority when the traditional Marxist perspective prioritizes itself to 
analyze inequalities by overvaluing as "principal contradiction" the only economic field. 
It will be understood, social inequality captured in their multidimensionality cover a 
total social fact and plural deserving to release based on field surveys and 
conceptualizations of the systemic nature. The system of inequalities and refers to the 
consistency of unequal social relations against which equality would then apply to the 
regulatory idea as wherever it is practically denied. This postulate supplies the sense of 
libertarian communist struggle and inequality Dictionary Alain Bihr Roland Pfefferkorn and 
thus represent a special sacrament to furbish their arms where the most scientifically 
rigorous understanding of reality allows to better fight politically for achievement possible.

Franz B. (AL 93)

Dictionary inequalities, under the direction of Alain Bihr and Roland Pfefferkorn, Armand 
Colin, 2014, 440 pages 29 euros.