After a close result at the polls, the PT candidate Dilma saddle four more years for the
ruling Workers' Party executive of the country. As well sinaliz?vamos, the left exit this
time can not come from the polls (read on: Elements of Electoral Scenario 2014 ). None of
majoritarian candidates , including the winning candidacy of PT (allegedly left), is
committed to breaking with the capital financial or end the legal mechanisms that compel
the payment of the public debt (the absurd Fiscal Responsibility Law). A nefarious
government debt grasps 42% of annual income, and without messing this payment, the income
of banks, no significant change can come in education, health or transport. ---- Both
applications (PT and PSDB) were financed by large capital (agribusiness, banks,
contractors and food industry) , making it clear that they do not even attempt to hide or
omit their umbilical links with the capital.
Still in the field of economics, we know this comes in clear slowdown. On the one hand,
the slowdown dissatisfy.Please the top, which comes profiting less, and the other starts
generating more outrage at the bottom, which has based its consumption in bank credit are
now indebted (57 million indebted Brazilians, of these 60% debt at twice the salary) . The
profiteering (economic principle characteristic of this government) suggests as a solution
to the high inflation in the interest rate, which moves in the opposite direction of
growth, after increasing the interest rate away from productive capital can generate more
and better jobs, as policies favoring scientific and educational, and still attracts
vultures speculation.
Again the dominant classes suggest that the solution to growth is to cut the meat workers,
cutting rights, privatizing services, raising taxes and reducing the already sparse budget
for social guarantees (such as Bolsa Familia). As in past 12 years, we know what we will
do PT, attack workers and their rights (as did already privatizing federal health in the
case of Ebserh and pension reform) , throwing a few crumbs to the most precarious (Bolsa
Fam?lia and More Doctors) , giving an aura of poor government, favoring the pact classes
through exorbitant profits to above and distributing of crumbs to the poor .
We know that this government will not seek to decentralize income and create jobs through
the expansion of services and works that benefit the population. We know it will not
against the increasing privatization of services and rights . We know that land reform is
already part of the past PT and is not in the plans of PT's "Letter to the Brazilian".
That's because his commitment was already sealed with the ruling classes, something that
occurred well before the 2014 elections .
Politically we should also mention that both applications make coalition with conservative
sectors (neopentecostal, large farmers, etc.) in federal benches (senate and congress) .
Covenants that they should further weigh against human rights (regulation of drugs,
anti-asylums, rights homosexual and woman, like abortion) , as pointed out after the DIEP
(Inter-Union Department of Parliamentary Studies), this is the composition of the most
conservative House since 1964.
In the field of politics, the only clearer commitment is with the PT said political
reform. This reform does not aim to put more power in the hands of the people to decide
the country's strategic issues, such as payment of debt, privatization, human rights, but
reshape worn representative and bourgeois political system , aimed at rehabilitating
against unbelieving mass, which absteu in the first round to about 30% of the process .
Level of abstention size, which is only less than 1998 since the "democratic opening".
A few days after the victory of Dilma, it appears that the appeals will not be heard from
the streets . The government says it will follow the model and when she talks to promote
dialogue not think about doing it with the revolting masses that occupy the streets since
2013, but with the opposition (PSDB), with the capital, with the same media as the attacks
. The PT makes a point of stating that there is no split in the society: "I urge, without
exception, all Brazilian men and women to unite in favor of the future of our country. I
do not believe that these elections have divided the country in half. I believe they
mobilized ideas and emotions sometimes contradictory, but moved by a common sentiment: the
quest for a better future "(speech Dilma post victory).
We organized anarchists, on the contrary, we continue to understand that this country is
still divided into exploiters and exploited . Therefore, we do not believe in a design
that offers the deal of the exploited classes in exchange for measly crumbs . On this side
of the trench, on the side of the exploited, will be 4 more years of struggle, or as
necessary for us to build a reality of socialism and freedom. We see that you can only get
the society we want through a project Class, Popular Power, which is not built on
agreements with the ruling class and its state, nor in elections, but in everyday struggle
in building power from below, in the marches, movements, unions and any space the struggle
of the exploited classes.
For us, still worth a maximum: Or if Vota with Angle or Struggle with Low!
Home »
» (en) Brazil, Coletivo Aanarquista Luta de Classe [CALC] - LIBERTARIAN SOCIALIST BRIEF ANALYSIS ON THE OUTCOME OF THE POLLS IN 2014 (pt)
(en) Brazil, Coletivo Aanarquista Luta de Classe [CALC] - LIBERTARIAN SOCIALIST BRIEF ANALYSIS ON THE OUTCOME OF THE POLLS IN 2014 (pt)
[machine translation]