Bill the Rajoy government (against) abortion, showed that the reaction never accept
conquests for our freedoms in general, especially when it comes to women's. It therefore
seemed interesting to return to the Spanish bill, to do a little tour of European news,
with a focus on France and reaffirm why we claim a free abortion. ---- The spanish bill
---- The Spanish reactionary government led by Rajoy passed a bill to eliminate altogether
the right of women to decide freely to terminate their pregnancies. Rescinding the 2010
law, this bill restricts indeed the right to abortion in two cases. The first, in case of
risk of serious danger to the life or physical or mental health of the woman. But the text
requires that the diagnosis be issued by two different and foreign doctors practicing in
establishing abortion. A doctor was once enough. In the second case, it is necessary that
the pregnancy is the result of a crime against liberty or sexual integrity of women. But
in cases of rape, she will have had previously complained. For the malformation of the
fetus may be invoked as a ground for termination of pregnancy will require two reports,
one for the mother and one for the fetus. It also facilitates the extension of the concept
of conscientious objection to all personnel involved in the process of abortion.
Logically, the richest Spanish will have an abortion in France or England. For those who
have not the means to go abroad, they will pay the consequences of illegal abortions. By
empowering medical checks by removing the ability of minors to access abortion, limiting
the possibilities of abortion, the Rajoy law undermines women's autonomy in decision
making on their bodies and their sexuality. Spain is getting ready to vote the most
authoritarian and repressive law against women's rights since the end of the Franco
dictatorship.
A brief overview of the situation in europe and worldwide1
In Europe, Ireland, Poland, Malta and Cyprus do not allow abortion. For cons, the
Netherlands and Great Britain, abortion is performed up to 22 weeks (12 weeks in France).
Belarus in January 2013 and Macedonia in June of that year have restricted access to abortion.
In Switzerland, a popular initiative project (largely prompted by the Catholic pro-life
movements) requesting termination of reimbursement abortions has collected over 109,000
signatures (100,000 is the minimum required). During the referendum of February 9, 2014,
69.8% of voters voted in favor of management by health insurance Interruptions Volunteers
of Pregnancy (VIP). The initiative "Funding abortion is a private matter - Reducing health
insurance costs by deleting abortion insurance core" is thus hopefully not last, but it
shows that the reactionary are in full offensive.
In Finland, women must get a doctor's approval and justify a risk to her physical or
mental health. In fact, it seems the law is interpreted more broadly. However the climate
is deleterious in 2013 a minister called abortion butchers and considers it should be
allowed at any stage of pregnancy. In Italy, up to 85% of physicians rely on the
conscience clause not to perform abortions. Illegal abortions are increasing with, among
others, a very dangerous drug "miracle" called Cyclotec. In Hungary, the only clinic
offering medical abortion was closed in January due to political pressure.
In Belgium, fewer and fewer physicians meet the demand for abortion. Elsewhere in the
world, the list of countries banning abortion or restricting is long and still is a great
influence of religion in Israel, Sri Lanka, Afghanistan, a few examples among many others.
More generally, the austerity policies and the governments that lead throughout Europe
(including France) are responsible for hardening of relay of patriarchal oppression
reactionary speech to the confinement of women in home, questioning abortion, end of the
economic independence of many women, increased male violence.
patriarchal This general offensive in Europe and the world, supported by the most
reactionary forces, designed to trap women in "their natural duties" (mother, housewife,
maid of all work and of course heterosexual), and is particularly severe where the crisis
hit hardest. Each year, according to WHO, 20 million pregnancies ending with 46 million
induced abortions take place under unsafe conditions and in a hostile social and legal
context. This causes annually kill about 47,000 women from infections, hemorrhages,
uterine injury etc.
The situation in france
In France, the right to abortion law went into it 40 years ago. But here, as in Spain, or
elsewhere, nothing is guaranteed and the right to abortion is always threatened. Since
Aubry Act 2001, the statutory deadline for abortion is 12 weeks pregnant (14 weeks of
amenorrhea). But this right is limited by the fact of lack of space in the centers. This
deficit is widening as the abortion clinics are closing. Bottlenecks exist in some areas
where demand is high (eg PACA). For 10 years, about 180 abortion centers were closed by
"restructuring" and "clusters" of hospitals, particularly in the context of pricing
activity (T2A), established by law Bachelot (HPST 2009 ) hospitals submitting the throes
of financial profitability: abortion, poorly paid, and disappears in the supply of a
number of institutions. Access to abortion is in fact undermined by the disappearance of
local structures and the wait time is so long that it prohibits some women to abort due to
exceeding the legal time of 12 weeks. Many women are then forced to go abroad to practice
abortion. Obviously women economically weakest and most isolated do not have the means to
exercise that option. In 2010, a third of women who went abroad have applied in France
before 14 weeks of gestation, but could not find a solution within the legal deadline. It
takes about 3 to 4 weeks before an abortion. This encouraged women to date to go to Spain,
where the delays are longer, in order to abort. The questioning of the right to abortion
in Spain will also have the effect of reversing this trend and increasingly precarious
access to abortion in France.
Besides the question of how the question of the exercise of objection or conscience clause
becomes the screen behind which is home to many refractory to medical abortion. The 2001
law is not applied in full and the choice of women is still subject to the medical and
social activist pressure reactionaries. The anti-abortion lobbies and "pro-life" movement
(often the same people who argue for the restoration of the death penalty) continue to
push for legislation restricting or prohibiting abortion.
attacks extreme right and Catholic fundamentalists on the right to abortion multiply slyly
on the net (in the guise of help and advice to abortion) and openly in the street (events,
intrusions and prayers before the abortion clinics). They were still 40,000 in the streets
of Paris in mid-January to support the bill the Spanish government...
Beyond the anti-abortion activists, a discourse on abortion can be guilt for women: "
normalization "of abortion is presented, including some favorable to abortion circles as a
disaster to be avoided at all costs; the "trauma" surrounding abortion is too often seen
as inevitable, even obligatoire2. The abortion is often combined with the passive - and
painful: we are "subject" an abortion, it "uses" an abortion, it "involves" an abortion...
In short, the words attached to this decision have generally negative connotations, this
social context effectively limits the choice of women by making it more complicated.
The right to abortion: the only choice for women
This right, like contraception, involves the right to dispose of her body. The
consequences of motherhood are different for fathers and mothers. The pregnant woman
knows, she and she alone, whether or not she wants to spend nine months of his life in a
future birth and birth and caring for a child after birth. In contrast to this, the
masculinist movement demanding the human right to authorize or prohibit abortion.
We support the right to abortion in all circumstances and without time limit. The decision
to abort or not is the sole responsibility of the pregnant woman. Restrict this right
amounts to restrict the options of all women face their lives. We are therefore called
"pro-choice."
Expression "Abortion" is clearly centered on the word "voluntary" and when we speak of
"unwanted pregnancy", it is the lack of desire to be a mother prevails. Person, including
a health professional, can deny that feeling.
Prior to abortion, the overall fertility control by women themselves, independently, is
also an important issue. Medical control for contraception, officially intended to protect
women's health and to provide advice on contraception options available to them, resulting
ultimately in a more or less orchestrated disinformation, resulting in a limitation of
choice. The truth is qu'affranchies any "control" and relying on health professionals to
validate medically personal choice, women would finally have control over their
contraceptive approach, their sexuality and their fertility. The concern for public health
displayed to preserve the health and well-being of women often hides a refusal of
patriarchal power, and through him the medical power of seeing women as able to decide for
themselves what suits them better.
This is too much autonomy for the proponents of a company, there is less than a century,
not even considering to grant women equal to men's legal capacity... It is unbearable for
states that through natalist policies always see the way to benefit from fodder boss to
economic needs and cannon fodder for their economic and colonial wars.
Birth control is a major challenge for the perpetuation of patriarchy.
Any change could wobble patriarchy in its most solid foundation and it is important to
keep women under control, in order to preserve the social base, political and economic in
place. We see this issue the bonds and mutual reinforcement of different systems of
domination (ie capitalism and patriarchy). We fight this situation and reaffirm our
commitment that women can freely dispose of their bodies.
To conclude
Far from being outdated, the struggles over access to contraception and abortion are free
and open indispensable attacks to limit this right... the show
must organize resistance against the economic threats (case of hospital) supporting
struggles against bed closures of abortion centers and hospitals.
We also provide a response to anti-abortion activists by taking an offensive speech on the
demand for abortion and contraception free and open.
Attacks against abortion in Spain resulted in a series of demonstrations in support of
Spanish feminists across Europe. In many French cities, initiatives have taken place this
hiver3. This solidarity must be developed to not leave the street to the reaction from the
"for AKI (against) any / all" multiplies public appearances.
Finally, we need to make sense of these struggles by linking them to a broader critique of
patriarchy and all systems of domination, arguing loudly our struggle for freedom and the
individual and collective emancipation.
Anne and Gilles (group Montpellier)
1 For situations and laws on abortion in different countries see: page "Right to Abortion"
on Wikipedia, and the article "Abortion in Europe. Where is the good news? "On the site of
Planned Parenthood
2 On this subject see the article "Fighting against the culture of trauma around abortion:
a social and political issue" Gaelle-Marie Zimmermann, journalist, author and columnist
3 For example, on 1 February 2014, at the initiative of group of Montpellier CGA, several
organizations have called for demonstrations: Nearly 400 people braved the rain in
solidarity with the Spanish women. See call for expression
Home »
» (en) France, Coordination of Anarchist Groups - IAL #100 - For free and open to all abortion, anywhere and unconditionally (en, pt)
(en) France, Coordination of Anarchist Groups - IAL #100 - For free and open to all abortion, anywhere and unconditionally (en, pt)
[Traduction automatique]