(en) Britain, Anarchist Federation - Resistance #156 - World War I special issue, 2014) - "All who died in the name of freedom, or human rights, or democracy, or feminism ..."

?Saturdays? (on the photo link: http://afed.org.uk/res/resist156.pdf ) opened the Victory 
Day 2010th look like they are happy and relieved! That's what my grandfather fought! ---- 
At school I was always belligerent child who constantly trumpeted about something (not 
much has changed), and from year to year, I had the same thoughts about the Victory Day. 
Yesterday I came across an excellent article in the ?Wales Online?, published in 2010, 
before the Victory Day, in which ex-military special forces Ben Griffin excellent publicly 
criticized the "Poppy Appeal" (an arbitrary transfer, more here: http: 
//markgrigorian.livejournal.com/433442.html ) as a political tool. ---- Griffin was the 
first soldier in the special forces, who refused to go into battle for political reasons 
and left the army in 2005. He questioned the appropriateness of using the Royal British 
Legion celebrities (like ?Saturdays? on the photo link), happily frolicking in 
makoobraznom confetti, reminding us that war is something more: "The Royal British Legion 
would declare that it is modernizing in order to to attract the younger generation. I do 
not agree. I believe that their tricks simplify, normalize and disinfect the war. " 
Griffin also points out that the language of the campaign, which calls us to remember our 
"heroes" and "support our troops", is an attempt to depoliticize the hoax and not only the 
"Victory Day", but, in fact, the war: "The use of the word" hero "glorify war and ignores 
the ugly reality. War is not like an episode from the movie with John Wayne. There is 
nothing comical that a man blew up a car, there is nothing heroic about shooting from 
ambush and there is nothing heroic in the deaths of countless civilians. Calling our 
soldiers civilians, we make an attempt to stifle criticism of the war in which we 
participate. Which brings us to this very fine line of propaganda: You can not support the 
war, but you have to support our heroes, which is tantamount to support for the war. "

"War against a foreign country only happens when the moneyed class believe that they will 
benefit from this benefit," George Orwell.

Griffin, of course, is not alone in his criticism of the war from the perspective of a 
veteran, and the famous quote Harry Patch was paid a lot of attention in the news feed in 
the social networks of people with anti-war beliefs:
"War - it is organized murder, and nothing more." Harry Patch. The last of the surviving 
soldiers of the First World War.

But what really struggled, "our heroes"? Noble cause of "freedom" - a slippery category in 
which everyone can claim to be something different, as illustrated by the strange 
cognitive dissonance that allows EDL (English Defence League) throw Ridge ... while they 
at the same time on the Victory Day "give honor "fallen in combat during World War II. For 
these and many other reasons, I share the concern about Griffin thin ideology implemented 
pervasive poppy seeds (a symbol of remembrance, a day of victory ...), which from the 
point of view of the Royal British League claims to "neutrality", but in reality is 
anything but it does not . Fortunately, the use and abuse of such political ideals of 
humanism, freedom, democracy and the emancipation of women in order to justify the 
imperialist military interventions, wrote a selection of my favorite contemporary writers.

In his preface to the "violence" Slavoj Zizek criticizes sense of "humanitarian urgency," 
which is so often used as a showcase that would justify war. In the end, if we are 
fighting a war for freedom of human rights, democracy and all those great things, how can 
you be against the war? How can you be against democracy, against freedom? Even Bush and 
Blair supported "democracy" in the end.

Nina Power in ?One-Dimensional Woman?, draws attention to the growing co-optation of 
feminism in favor of military intervention, particularly in relation to the recent 
conflicts in the Middle East. On the disgusting treatment of Taliban women was cited 
numerous times as a good reason why we should go to war with Afghanistan, and have to go 
NOW. How can you be against the war with Afghanistan, if the world is to support 
Afghanistan's brutal regime, squirted acid in the face of potential schoolgirls? Power 
rightly notes that the war has become an even greater obstacle to the existence of Afghan 
feminists now labeled as agents of the occupants, not to mention the absurdity of the 
right, suddenly clinging to the rights of women as for his battle cry and cause the 
judges, at the same time occupying women at home by removing the necessary measures to 
protect them from domestic violence, ensuring health and access to abortion.

There are many other convincing arguments against the Victory Day and what it represents - 
a seemingly apolitical use of kitsch nationalism to weaken any critical reflection or 
dissent; the absurdity of the "Memory of War" at the time, as we continue to numerous 
military campaigns and take over the world; the hypocrisy of a government that can afford 
to send troops to war, but leaves their social security when they return to the care of 
the charity.

All things considered, I'm still not going to buy a poppy this year.

Original: http://afed.org.uk/res/resist156.pdf