France, Coordination of Anarchist Groups CGA - Federal motions: Anarchist responses to the ecological crisis (fr, pt)

The crisis of capitalist development and its social consequences have overshadowed the 
environmental crisis, yet more than ever. From our perspective, this crisis can be divided 
into three main areas: global warming, ecosystem degradation and depletion of natural 
resources. ---- Global warming ---- Since the 70s, climate change due to the system of 
capitalist production have been recognized, especially in the radical environmental 
movement. Obviously, these positions have been ridiculed by those in power. It is only in 
80-90 years, when the issue of global warming become more and more essential, they 
incorporate in their speech under the pressure of a part of the scientific community. 
However, global warming was still considered a possible consequence of human activities, 
and not as a fact.

Since the IPCC report 1 in 2007, the impact of human activities rejecting greenhouse gas 
emissions in the atmosphere is an undisputed fact, except by supporters of a 
climate-skeptic discourse or fake experts at the oil multinationals, as we have seen at 
the scandal-called "climategate".

The overall increase in global temperature has indeed several consequences: an increase in 
sea level due to the melting of land ice and the expansion of seawater (in fact, unlike 
the melting ice the melting of freshwater ice contributes to the rise of the sea), but 
also changes in ocean currents and the water cycle. This increase in sea level threatens 
the inhabitants es lowland areas including Delta. The most emblematic example is 
Bangladesh, which in the worst-case scenario could see more than half of its 150 million 
inhabitants-are migrating. Not to mention that this is added the increased volume of 
annual rainfall that could result in an increase in the intensity and frequency of storms 
and cyclones.

The consequences of global warming therefore announce major migrations that are sure to 
cause a social and agricultural disaster (with the total disappearance of some cultivated 
areas) if no collective provision is made.
In general, this ecological trend will probably multiply exceptional weather events 
(storms, drought, heat waves ...), make agricultural production more unstable and 
aggravate situations of food shortages in areas that are direct or indirect victims of 
natural disasters.

Ecosystem degradation

The increasing industrialization of our societies is accompanied by increasing pollution 
of natural ecosystems.

The increase in industrial areas and urban areas due to industrialization destroys 
ecosystems and potential agricultural areas, and disrupts the runoff. Plants, particularly 
those related to refining use solvents, some of which are found in nature and in the 
streams. In many countries where the infrastructure of water purification are very 
insufficient, it becomes a public health problem. In all cases, fish stocks are affected, 
decreasing volumes fishing. A quasi-sterilization of aquatic environments is sometimes 
observed as in the Danube.

The most vulnerable and most affected by this pollution plants and animals are generally 
not operated by key industrial sectors in the capitalist system of production. They are 
living organisms in natural ecosystems are destroyed or are barely surviving the ravages 
of intensive crops or livestock practices. However, if these organisms have not, a priori, 
a significant direct economic weight, they have an indirect role may be absolutely 
necessary. For example, if the bee has a very low direct economic weight, pollination by 
bees is of paramount importance for the sustainability of plant species and therefore 
fruit production. It is the same for all ecosystems and soil micro-organisms challenged by 
many agricultural practices that despise the living and the importance of biodiversity.

In addition to these examples, the list of adverse events to the environment and companies 
is long: massive erosions reliefs, destruction of large tracts of primary forest, 
environmental contamination with GMOs crossings, etc.. This ecosystem degradation has a 
direct impact on the health of human beings. The massive use of pesticides, for example, 
is a factor of increase of cancer cases. It is the same for the use of polluting materials 
in food activities, structures, etc..

The depletion of natural resources

Beyond the pollution caused by intensive modes and industrial production, increasing 
industrialization inevitably leads to the exhaustion of "raw" resources and raw materials 
it needs in excessive quantities. For several centuries, the pressure on the stock of fuel 
resources was infinitesimal in terms of expressed human needs. Today, the ratio is 
completely reversed, and it is clear that these resources will decline and, for some, may 
dry up. But a very large part of the current production system, dictated by the capitalist 
logic of growth and profit, can not function without these energy resources. Projected to 
non-renewable resources being exploited all eventually reach a "peak" after which the 
extraction will be more difficult, costly and unprofitable term. In addition, vital 
natural resources, such as the surface of soil fertility and the quality of water and air, 
are also affected by industrialization. Their depletion or degradation constitute direct 
threats to health and life of humans. Here is an overview of what is known and planned for 
decades about the depletion of natural resources and the "peaks" considered.

Degradation and depletion of land used for food production are caused by two main factors. 
The first is the loss of soil, which are saturated fertilizers and pesticides from the 
petrochemical industry. The most visible phenomenon is soil sealing, causing landslides 
and severe flooding. The second is land grabbing by the owners who have large capital. 
They will buy foreign jurisdictions, particularly in Africa, to make places of intensive 
farming practices of excluding local populations, which are then used on these plots and 
deprived of any choice of production. As for arable land and close capita-es, governments 
and employers have often destroyed to allocate to other functions more "profitable" than 
agriculture.

Access to safe water, especially drinking water, will prove increasingly difficult. In 
addition to the increase in water consumption due to industrial and agricultural 
production, many pollution problems are increasing with increased presence of fertilizers, 
pesticides, drugs, heavy metals and all types of industrial discharges into waters.

The "rare earth" means a set of metallic materials become highly strategic resources since 
their magnetic properties. They are used in the fields of electronics, information 
technology and energy, being present for example in computers, mobile phones, flat 
screens, but also in wind turbines and batteries. The extraction of "rare earth" is 
extremely polluting and harmful. There are, teeth problems and skin cancers as well as 
increased contact with water made toxic. The extraction results in releases of acids and 
radioactive thorium, flowing Unprotected waters and the surrounding land. In contact with 
these products, some organisms become infertile land and agriculture is impossible.
Regarding other metals, such as copper, nickel, zinc, lead, tin, etc.. Facing the 
increasing demand and the depletion of the deposits, their operating could peak 20 or 30 
years. The metal content of the new ore is operated lower, which increases the energy 
required to extract the metals. Moreover, even if recycling allows reuse of metals, it is 
far from total. In addition, working conditions in the mines are dramatic and irreversible 
consequences and often fatal health.

Peak oil has already been reached, and we are in the plateau phase that precedes the 
decline. The most accessible oil has already been extracted, and in 2030, "production" 
world should be halved. The oil industry is now turning to the exploitation of oil sands 
and shale, causing significant environmental damage.

Uranium reserves, necessary for the operation of nuclear power plants decline rapidly. The 
largest reserves are now under the sea Its extraction rate is already lower than its rate 
of consumption, with much of the uranium that comes disarmament and stocks. At the current 
rate, the uranium peak is expected around 2035. Nuclear disasters at Three Mile Island, 
Chernobyl and Fukushima have not convinced the leader-es that profit to stop its use.

A gas peak is provided by the French Petroleum Institute between 2020 and 2030. According 
to this source, this peak may be heavier than peak oil, including significant shortages 
consequences, since the gas can be substituted for oil in many cases, while there is 
currently no substituent Gas scale. As the peak of coal, it could be reached by 2025.

False solutions to environmental problems

Environmental problems briefly described above are largely consensus in political circles 
and among the intellectual and political elites, who nevertheless minimize environmental 
issues. We therefore propose an anarchist critique of the following political positions 
who want to be a response to environmental issues.

Green capitalism

We call green capitalism, policy positions that advance it is possible to solve the 
environmental crisis of capitalism without going through a series of supposed organize an 
energy transition reforms. For example, Europe Ecology Green defends the idea of a 
state-sponsored capitalist economy to complete this transition. As part of this policy, 
has emerged internationally carbon credits, that is to say, rights to emit CO2 that can 
monetize interstate. More broadly, a fraction of the economic and intellectual elite think 
giving a market value of goods "natural" according to their rarity allow capitalism to 
regulate and stop the environmental crisis. For us, this position can not in any way solve 
the environmental crisis or even reduce the damage in progress.
First, a few practical experiments of this policy proved ineffective. Carbon credits have 
not decreased the total volume of CO2 emissions because powerful states could redeem 
credits for exceeding the threshold. Then the capitalists desperately fun of national and 
transnational law. Just think of the many mines in Africa where solvents are used without 
any protection or circuit reprocessing, particularly in countries like the Democratic 
Republic of Congo in permanent civil war. In France, the capitalists refuse to pay the 
remediation of old mines or damage of oil spills. We believe that the capitalists will be 
laws with green real es-es little environmentalists is either incredibly bad faith, or a 
na?ve beyond belief.

Recall that the capitalist system is totally dependent system of perpetual economic growth 
and in case of decrease in production, the level of profit to capital invested decreases. 
This analysis is confirmed by historical facts. Indeed, the need for increased production 
and profits of capitalism has been a key driver of the colonial process, and remains the 
key driver of neo-colonial process today. We see with the conquest of new territories to 
exploit (Brazilian colonial front on Amazon), new resources to extract (tar sands, shale 
gas ...).
The need to increase the intrinsic profitability of this system makes it impossible to 
reconcile the Capital and environmental issues. For us, the solution to these problems can 
only be found in a complete break with capitalism, that is to say in a revolutionary way.

The particular case of nuclear energy

All false alternatives to the ecological crisis, often presented today as the best 
solution to reduce CO2 emissions, nuclear power is probably the most misleading.
Our refusal and our claim for immediate release of nuclear energy is based on the 
observation of the specificity of nuclear risk in relation to all other industrial hazards 
known to date:
On the health front, the radioactivity is the only phenomenon that can damage the genetic 
material of any living being (ie flora and fauna combined) a cumulative and irreversible 
generation, and likely to affect the entire the population of a species.
In terms of safety, nuclear installations (reactors, storage or waste disposal) are 
industrial structures that have the potential of highest risk are inevitably the most 
vulnerable. There is a fundamental contradiction between the scales of multi-millennial 
time some radioactive elements and requirements for basic safety. Beyond all the dangers 
that threaten any infrastructure (climate, geology, accident, human error, etc..), The 
main risk factor that threatens a nuclear installation is geopolitical uncertainty.
Ethically, nuclear is the only industry capable of leaving a legacy for several centuries 
or millennia to future human generations of storage sites and landfill to manage reactors 
that no longer produce electricity dismantle regions or even whole countries irradiated. 
Just like today if we had control and improve storage sites that we have left ancient 
civilizations to provide electricity for a few decades.

In economic terms, nuclear power is the most expensive of all energy. The final cost of an 
accident, the costs of waste management and other dismantling of reactors, are simply 
incalculable because of the life of radioactive elements.

On the political level, nuclear power involves, by its dangerousness, a concentration of 
power and therefore a hierarchical society. Finally, nuclear power and nuclear weapons are 
a hellish tandem since their appearance. So far, over a State has developed its civilian 
nuclear program, the more easily have access to nuclear weapons. The nuclear weapons is 
still sitting on the civil nuclear industry.

Institutional response to the environmental crisis

A large segment of the associative fabric 2 environmentalist vocation to expect the state 
to legislate in the sense of preservation of threatened ecosystems and the reform of 
individual behavior. For us, this option is doomed to failure because the state can not go 
against the interests of capitalism and it is structurally against environmental objectives.

In recent years, partly under pressure from environmental groups, the state has increased 
the number of environmental structures such as National Parks, PNR (Regional Natural 
Park), habitats Directives (Natura 2000) ... These state devices aim to preserve 
particularly sensitive areas by regulating human activities within them to. After 30 years 
of this policy, the conclusion is clear that sensitive habitats are declining and that, 
generally, the ongoing degradation have by no means been curbed.

Instead of the environmental analysis of associations that this failure by too little 
government involvement, we believe that this policy only creates more bureaucracy 
economically costly and having a repressive power that oppresses a little more the world 
of work, particularly in the agricultural profession. Indeed, in addition to an economic 
environment that tends to intensify production by continuous degradation of agricultural 
income workers-Artists of the earth have a large surplus labor to fulfill the obligations 
of this green bureaucracy. So not only the economic trend that pushes workers-makers to 
have anti-environmental practices is not addressed, but again, this bureaucratic 
constraint promotes the reactionary behavior of workers-Artists of the land and forest 
vis- towards environmental issues.

Rather than the development of a bureaucracy and the establishment of repression, we 
believe that we must fight for improved labor income that allow the establishment of more 
environmental practices. Similarly, we want to promote the socialization of production, in 
raising socially-workers Artists, makes possible the exchange of analysis and practice, 
opening up new collective perspectives and the emergence of a stronger awareness ecologist.

Authoritarian decay

We refer to this concept all the political and intellectual currents that claim that the 
resolution of social and environmental issues through the decline in economic activity.
If we share the founder of Georgescu-Roegen analysis saying that the global economy has a 
level of use than their regeneration rate natural resources, we believe that the decline 
is a flawed concept because it does not exclude models authoritarian society nor to 
explain the establishment and development of social structures and socially useful 
economic activities. The concept of decay says nothing of the political organization 
involved. Thus, some environmentalists can they call their vows a kind of "dictatorship" 
environmentalist supposed to command the respect of the environment. More broadly, the 
concept of decay could be claimed by people carrying a racist, fascist or theocratic 
vision of society. Currently, the internal contradictions of capitalism and the apparent 
lack of credible revolutionary perspective oscillate most speech and environmental 
movements between two poles as utopian as the other one: "sustainable development" (clear, 
sustainable growth ) and decay of capitalism without exit. Finally, if the capitalist 
system seeks to grow to grow, there is no more relevant to oppose an "alternative" that 
would be to decrease to decrease.

The challenge is rather to reduce the overall production level below the renewal of 
natural resources, while ensuring equal access to goods and services produced. So the 
fundamental question we hope to overcome the ecological crisis is who decides what is 
produced and how to produce. The necessary reduction in the level of production therefore 
requires humanity to the challenge of direct democracy because only the people, not 
private actors in competition with each other, have a real interest to overcome the 
ecological crisis. But it also involves the challenge of equality because the only way to 
reduce the level of production without harming anyone suppose to cover the needs equally.
Thus, rather than decrease, we demand the socialization of production and decision-making 
power in society to finally rationalize the economy and meet the needs according to 
available resources.

In the nebula of decay, we recognize that there is genuine progressive and fighting, 
including the fight against the advertising harassment, in which we find ourselves. If 
there is a libertarian component of this current, there is also a strong state trend, 
which PPLD (Party For The decay), the newspaper handed The Decay 3 , fascists 
"identiverts" ... If one sees the ultra-right currents claiming the decrease is that the 
promotion of localism at all costs is somewhat ambiguous.

The population control

Address the issue of limited resources and environmental pollution problems due to human 
activities, some so-called "neo-Malthusian" current advocate birth control to stop the 
growth of the world population, or reduce its size. These theories are called in reference 
to Malthus, an economist from the early 19th century. According to him, the population 
growth is much faster than resources, it should impose a strict birth control "moral 
virtues" and late marriage, and stop all aid to the poor in order to increase their mortality.

We can only be in firm opposition to that part of the population has dominion seeking to 
control the rate of reproduction of another part of the population. All current and past 
policies of birth control applications clearly show unequal practices, authoritarian or 
dictatorial. They were able to face large campaigns encouraging contraceptive conducted by 
the rich countries in the so-called developing countries, compulsory taking 
contraceptives, fines of birth, but also forced sterilizations and abortions forced.
The underlying ideological reasons were more or less openly racist, ethnic, theocratic, 
fascist, or eugenics. Environmental considerations have served as fronts for identity and 
racist fears of order, with a fear of the "invasion" of foreign and designated as having 
higher birthrate populations, whether by migration, by wars or by grabbing available 
resources. Under the guise of limited resources, some governments have implemented ethnic, 
religious or social control policies to reduce population growth targeted minorities or to 
limit the political explosion hazards related to poverty. The eugenic ideology 
characterized by the fear of a deterioration in the "quality of people" took the form of 
mass forced "poor" and "offender-es" gay-s-the sterilization of disabled, or with 
psychiatric disorders.

As for the concept of wanting to reduce the population to reduce resource consumption and 
pollution, it fails to take into account many factors. Indeed, the use of available 
resources and pollution levels do not depend on the size of the population, but also 
patterns of consumption, production, processing, transport, agro-industrial pressures .. . 
The age structure of the population, his way of occupying space, the territorial 
distribution of resources are examples of other elements included in. So not only a 
decrease in population would not result in a systematic way a decrease in the use of 
resources, but more is no scientific study has ever shown that human population is too 
large given the planet's resources.

Malthusian policies fall within the patriarchal domination system targeting mainly women. 
These are reduced to the function of procreation, dictated by political campaigns, 
prohibited by coercive measures, or removed by physical attacks do not even theirs.
For us, environmental issues can not possibly be solved by imposing authoritarian any 
birth control. In addition, population control is not in itself a solution to 
environmental problems. Conversely, we believe that the direct support by the people of 
Economic and Social Affairs to organize the egalitarian distribution of wealth produced 
taking into account the resources available to answer closest to the needs of all. We know 
that across the population, the birth rate is influenced by the level of life and social 
organization. Out with religious discourse, patriotic and natalist, we demand a free 
access to contraception for the emancipation of having a child or not choice, the desired 
moment. Under these conditions, we believe that the desire to overcome the ecological 
crisis is not an obstacle to the individual to have several choices, or no children at all.

Promotion and mass acts of alternatives

If there is no political organizations that focus exclusively this policy option, she 
finds herself in a relatively diffuse especially in the libertarian community. Indeed, a 
large number of comrades think that the development of alternative projects according to 
libertarian principles will create a revolutionary rupture.
For us, the promotion and development of alternative self-management / environmental / ... 
deed, if necessary, can not alone be a central strategy for libertarian communists because:
these alternatives acts require a huge investment for a limited social impact;
they are in a political context that is their very unfavorable, resulting in a good chance 
of partial or total failure with recovery, prioritization, etc.. ;
they intersect is the activists who are involved in the social reality of exploited es-es 
apolitical;
and above all they are not a direct confrontation with the rule of capital and the state 
that adapt quite well to this form of political protest not so much. The dominant-es can 
also exploit these experiments to "prove" that it is possible to live so plural even 
radical in the capitalist system.

Although alternatives acts are rich, interesting, and sometimes copies and relay, we can 
not rely solely on these experiments to go to a social and libertarian revolution.

The antispecism 4

While most members of the current policy does not limit their actions to environmental 
problems, they often claim that they can solve their positions difficulties pointed above. 
For us, antispecism as a political project for the abolition of all forms of exploitation 
of animals, does not allow the resolution of environmental problems. More broadly, the 
current policy is not compatible with anarchism we defend.
Industrial livestock, mainly poultry and pigs is largely negative: high emissions of 
greenhouse gases, nitrogen, and high consumption of antibiotics. The abandonment of these 
sectors and modes of consumption are related is essential for solving environmental 
problems. However, the use of animals for us unsurpassable, especially in a context of 
scarcity of fossil resources. Indeed, farming improves soil fertility, condition for 
obtaining cereal and vegetable yields for measuring dietary needs. It also allows rapid 
recycling of food by-products such as bran (residues decortication cereals). It ensures 
the production of textile products with wool and leather ... The abandonment of farming 
and its functions would be greater use of petroleum products (chemical fertilizers and 
synthetic fibers) is a very significant reduction in the volume of food production 
(falling crop yields due to lack of fertilization and crop substitution food crops by 
textile fibers).

The abandonment of the use of animals deprive us of an important aid work for tillage, 
handling heavy objects ... that can not be compensated by an increase in oil consumption. 
Indeed, how skidded a tree in the forest without using a tractor?

For antisp?cistes, stop the use of animals is the establishment of equal rights between 
human and non-human. For us, equality corresponds to the establishment of a social 
organization where the decision-making power and access to resources are equivalent to 
all. This equality goes beyond equal treatment and requires to society, that is to say, to 
share a story and a collective work that the intergenerational transmission ensures the 
autonomy of individuals in society, which is not the case between humans and non-humans. 
The antispecism treats inequalities exclusively via discrimination, denying in fact the 
development of social structures leading to structural inequality between individuals of 
the same company.

Defining freedom and equality exclusively by the connections between individuals and not 
within a collective social structure, antispecism is for us essentially liberal. It is 
thus incompatible with anarchism we stand for, which aims to establish a political and 
economic equal society where freedom is the same for everyone since it can not really 
exist in unequal social relations. Far from being anecdotal, the definition of freedom and 
equality outside the definition of a corporation, is the ideological base which part of 
the partisan es antispecism assimilate factory farming to Holocaust breach to the 
trivialization of genocide denial, and the intrusion of this fascist movement.

Strategic axes on environmental issues for the cga

Activists of the CGA we say that environmental issues as social issues can not be resolved 
in the capitalist economy and under the yoke of the state. As the social question, we can 
act now by increasing the ratio of force to impose progressive conquests to taking es of 
power. To truly solve environmental problems, we want the socialization of the means of 
production and the federal organization, in terms of social and environmental 
reorganization of the economy.

Social and libertarian revolution is our only option to stop environmental degradation. It 
is possible for us today to push for intensification of struggle against the nuclear 
industry against new oil extraction (gas and shale oil), imposing restrictions on 
intensive agriculture, stop the implementation large unnecessary and anti-social sites ...
It is important for us activists anarchists to address these struggles as well as 
revolutionary action alone can solve all the environmental and social problems, it is 
urgent to put a brake to degradations in progress if we not want a field of ruins in the 
medium term.

In this it seems necessary for anarchists to take environmental issues and to engage with 
others in the "environmentalists" struggles when it can develop a relationship of 
effective power while keeping the specific discourse.

We will develop this strategic positions and axes of the CGA overlooked a number of 
environmental issues.

Struggles against nuclear

Anti-nuclear struggles are still part of one of the cornerstones of the fight 
"environmentalist."
On this subject the CGA says it should phase out nuclear power immediately by the 
construction of a power struggle for the abolition of popular excessively dangerous and 
polluting industry and serves as a screen for military weapons.
We claim:
the dismantling of all nuclear weapons;
the shutdown immediate operation of all power plants and nuclear research;
remediation of former nuclear sites.

The oil industry

Main cause of the greenhouse effect and responsible for many environmental disasters (BP 
in the Gulf of Mexico), the oil industry is at the heart of the capitalist economic 
system. It makes sense for us to develop struggles that limit the development of this 
industry, or even reduce it.
Today capitalist multinational companies have large legal facilities to be exempt from 
liability when major ecological disasters (Erika, BP ...). Also the development of 
struggles for oil pay their full damage should limit the reproduction of these disasters, 
constituting a relevant issue facing the capitalists. We support the struggles that result 
in environmental damage, claim that the polluter pays.
In addition, we demand today:
Stop all new hydrocarbon prospecting;
free public transport, multiplication, and their accessibility to the greatest number;
reorganization of modes.

In the longer term, to reduce our needs in terms of energy expenditure, it seems necessary 
to consider a redesign of the territory. It should no longer be suitable only for mass 
consumption in malls and delivery of employee-es in their workplaces.
The land must be designed to reduce the distances traveled by people to access their 
decision-making bodies, labor, supplies of food, water, etc.. We need a general move 
towards the development of short and towards a decentralized energy system based on the 
least possible adverse renewable energy for the environment at a given location.

Biodiversity

At the global scale, ecosystem diversity and complexity are largely in decline. In case 
there are two major factors, significant releases of toxic substances from industry and 
household consumption and increased chemical inputs in agriculture.
In terms of toxic releases, we believe that we have to stop the use of polluting synthetic 
molecules, or their strict minimum containment and stopping the use of GMOs.
In terms of agriculture, we believe that the universal biological culture, that is to say, 
without synthetic chemical inputs, is real progress on our health and the preservation of 
"the environment." But disconnected from social demands, we find this claim 
against-productive. Because in the state of the capitalist economy, impose organic farming 
would drive up food prices well above inflation so impoverished workers, Artists, as 
supply decreases with application notes, yields " organic "being on average 30% less than 
the conventional. We believe that we must couple the claim of organic farming to claims on 
food prices with, for example, their cap and indexing or less inflation-third lower wages 
or RSA, or any other index representing the evolution of the wealth of the working 
classes. Without being dogmatic, this is to find a compelling and progressive claim 
conveniently.

Setting organically grown, although representing a majority progress "green" does not 
guarantee certain agricultural damage caused by structural problems. For example, the 
development of major production areas with a very low level of integration between 
livestock and crops, among other causes a very high proportion of nitrates in the water, 
making it unfit for consumption. Only the collective management of land, a holistic 
approach to agriculture in its environment, can avoid these problems by taking into 
account all the advantages and disadvantages of production.
To fight today against the loss of ecosystems and agricultural and industrial pollution, 
we demand:
stopping the use of all molecules diagnosed as dangerous and capacity certification systems;
stopping the use of GMOs;
universalization of organic farming and food price cap;
the increase in purchase prices of agricultural products and the improvement of working 
conditions of agricultural workers-es.

More generally, activists of the CGA, we believe that environmental struggles must bind to 
the social struggles that they both aim to reduce the negative impact of Capital and the 
State in our lives. This link is particularly important as some environmentalists alone 
struggles are easily manipulated and / or recoverable by bourgeois statist parties.
Obviously, the fascist movement is illustrated also in the recovery of some environmental 
struggles, the movement broadly as regards the defense of animal rights and more 
specifically the current identity clinging to a vision of "human land" traditions and 
excluding everything that is foreign (human or non-European cultures).

These claims, although limited, are our actual social progress on the field of 
environmental issues. Furthermore immediate progress, we believe that making immediate 
protest axes is essential for the construction of a report popular force that opposes the 
capitalist forces and is the embryo of the social revolution and libertarian 
environmentalist tomorrow.

Coordination of Anarchist Groups

in January 2014

1 Intergovernmental Group of Experts on Climate Change, commissioned by the UN on climate 
issues.

2 We believe among others WWF, LPO, Greenpeac e, etc..

3 The editors Managers would dispute this appellation, but for us this newspaper has many 
items to define "good" behavior of a descending-e-e, true green catechesis. Among the many 
politically questionable items, we use the December 2012 open debate on the Marriage for 
everyone who had on this topic only briefly describing a variety of made in the USA, 
speaking a couple of lesbians who allowed their trans girl taking a treatment to delay 
puberty, and purporting to be chemically castrated a boy of ten years. Rivarol would not 
have done better ...

4 For a more detailed development of the cleavage between anarchism and our antispecism, 
refer to texts on antispecism available on the website of the CGA in the theme of "ecology".