In a few weeks fell three decisions of the judiciary against the militants, activists and
ordinary protesters in Paris, Nantes, Tours. The challenge: the questioning of a
multinational interests in a devastating infrastructure project such as an airport, the
indictment of the police and the use by police of lethal weapons (which when they do not
kill, seriously injure and maim for life those they reach) during demonstrations, the
questioning of racist and xenophobic policy of the French government today. ---- More than
ever, the legal battle is not separable fighting against the company, its logical tax,
violence, exploitation, segregation and focus not (including financial) of those who s'
opposed. ---- Three examples among others. ---- The conviction of 14 militants Collective
Ile-de-France airport against Notre-Dame-des-Landes and a new complaint against a militant
of the group.
Peter's testimony, the Nantes student who lost an eye after a shooting flash-ball there
six years and has been unsuccessful in his appeal;
The release of two comrades, JC and Muriel de Tours (Thirst collective utopias) Cassation
rejected in the month of June.
Press the Collective against airport Notre-Dame-des-Landes Ile-de-France:
The Pinault are bent:
a new complaint against an activist of our collective
Our friend, who is one of 14 militant.es condamn?.es June 24 for having invit?.es in the
castle of the shareholder Vinci, relayed on his blog, after the verdict, a statement and a
poster the Paris collective fight against the airport in Notre-Dame-des-Landes. She is
summoned to appear Nov. 8, 2013 before the 17th Criminal Chamber of the Paris Court. It
was followed by Pinault father and son for defamation. The defamatory elements according
to the civil party: a poster of Fran?ois-Henri Pinault vampire with lambs on the head, and
the following passage from the press release: "Pinault polluter, thief, expropriation" .
Redial previous facts:
On January 27, 15 people were invited to the park for family castle multibillion Fran?ois
and Fran?ois-Henri Pinault to denounce their responsibility in the project to build the
airport in Notre-Dame-des-Landes. The Pinault family did not appreciate the picnic
protest! Put / are in custody for 45 hours, the pique-niqueurs/ses were accus?.es of
trespass, death threats, and some of them / it, refusal to submit to sample DNA
identification.
On June 24, the high court of Versailles condemned inculp?.es 14 to 2 months suspended
sentence to a fine of 5600 euros, 1250 euros in legal fees, 1 euro fine in favor of the
plaintiff. The seals were confiscated, and the demand for non-inclusion in the criminal B2
denied. The condamn?.es appealed this decision, they await a trial date.
RDV 8 November 2013 to 13 h 15 before the 17th Criminal Chamber, Chamber of the press
tribunal de grande instance of Paris to support our fellow accused of defamation.
Rennes, October 11, 2013:
travesty last episode
Non-story of deliberate appeal trial
Friday, October 11, 8 pm
Large droplets and rain and a cold wind welcomed us in Rennes metropolis. Already this
fall. This is the sixth fall since I've been hit hard in the middle of a crowd of
demonstrators students: a masked police had adjusted the barrel of his new weapon on my
face. That was in 2007. I was 16.
The gunman, Matthew L?glise is a repeat offender, he had volunteered to test the LBD then
experiment. One of his golf experience: the marches of students. Matthew L?glise had
continued to parade in uniform, armed, in Nantes streets in the months and years that
followed. To summon the police after several years is already the result of a bitter
struggle, long-term. I encountered the Kafkaesque wall of the French state, much more
armed, strong and organized than me.
In March 2012, the Court of Nantes, black, gloomy, stretched by a multitude of blue vans,
had pronounced the acquittal of police shooter. "He was only following orders" We appealed
against this map White Nantes a judge offered to all policies to maim with impunity.
Offering a favorable precedent for flash-ball shooters.
More than a year later, in June 2013, I pleaded not through, opposite the judges of the
Court of Appeal of Rennes. I recalled that the police had lied to countless times,
destroyed from the evidence (minutes of gunfire, police at the time of shooting films),
but my case was not isolated. He was part of a whole, a safe offensive militarization of
police impunity guaranteed. Dozens of people have been seriously injured or killed since
my injury in 2007. This court she will be less subject to the terror exercised by the
Nantes police? Deliberate then announced for October 2013.
"We are in a state of law" This is the argument belched a uniform to justify the roadblock
set up by his colleagues to help us - me, my friends, LDH civil party - attend the
deliberations of the case. I find a curiosity which I had never heard of: the deliberate
behind closed doors, where it prevents the complainants to attend hearings concerning them.
The Rennes judge makes a deliberate illegal. And all this in the name of law. The police
claim that there is no place, as they had already claimed the hearings that preceded: they
lie. They bring before us many, while blocking us. The journalists had - for some - more
than I could have some on my own business.
"I do not give a fuck" , adds the same officer when I warn you that I will find this new
judicial masquerade, intimidation, contempt that we are undergoing. Obviously, orders were
given to: Filter intruders. Others can go, not us. We're stuck in front of the security
gate of the court by the police. I could reasonably have expected the cowardly decision to
confirm the release of the shooter. I had not imagined by against judges may need a
curtain of police to prevent a complainant attends the decision is concerned. A policeman
raises his major in our direction. His colleagues are hilarious. Until the end, on the
bottom as on the form: pathetic.
"The Court of Appeal upheld the acquittal of Matthew total L?glise" This is ultimately a
secretary who then confirms me that I had to force the portal to get to the beginning of
an information. It is now nearly 10 hours, deliberate were read a long time. The argument
the judge will not give me that day, I would not know its content, I missed the deliberate
for "security reasons." After cynicism, humiliation and police impunity reigns. A huge
machine trying to destroy a second time those trying to survive the assault by security
forces. We find the same practices, the same lies, the same intimidation in the various
cases of flash-ball - and police violence at large. It is found that the injured judged
accused. This is double jeopardy. We must keep our heads. Without illusions.
Sarkozy's police mutilated me. Socialist Justice today confirmed the acquittal of police
shooter. Meanwhile, the successive Ministers of Interior offered hundreds of these "guns
for military use" - according to the official terminology that categorizes these objects -
that are the LBD. The mutilated multiplied.
A part of the fight continues the tribunal to convict the chain of command of the police,
the state has armed the shooter. This will not be worried. This is a page turns.
A thought for tou-te-s-are injured by police weapons. The last - to my knowledge: Salim,
14, in Trappes this summer.
Neither forgiveness nor oblivion,
Pierre
TRIAL OF 4 OF TOURS: THE RACKET If AMPLIFIED!
The Supreme Court delivered its judgment. On the one hand, justice (class) prohibits:
* To individuals, structures to publicly report their suspicions about possible abuses,
excesses on the part of the administration, police and gendarmerie;
* To make historical comparisons to analyze the current developments in the light of
experience, including the Petain regime. It should be noted that a comparison is not an
amalgam. There is no question that Sarkozy is Petain, etc.. Compare is to take into
account historical experience that brings us, in this case, the Vichy period, to examine
our past to affect the present and try to consider different futures. Make comparisons and
alerting is more than necessary;
* To rebel against racist and xenophobic policies of the state. For example, how to
describe the decision of the Ministry of the Interior ordered through the circular of 5
August 2010, the hunt for Roma? How is it that no official (administration, police and
gendarmerie) has refused to carry out this illegal order? These questions are still
relevant. The hunt for Roma has not stopped, quite the contrary. Valls is a virtuoso in
the field than its predecessors.
On the other hand, the justice (class) allows
* Minister to censor an opinion that the mind;
* The state to treat people differently according to whether they are leaders or peasants.
Only personnel policy caste may be considered defamatory remarks. This confirms that
political criticism should be made by professionals that are elected officials and party
leaders recognized by the system. Could this not lead to the prohibition of
anti-capitalist ideas as anarchism?
The Criminal Court sentenced Tours had 3 of the 4 accused of Tours 500 ? suspended fine
each, ? 300 in damages each ? 3,000 collectively to pay the plaintiff. The Court of Appeal
added ? 3,000 to collectively pay the same qualified recipient "victim" (that is to say,
the Minister of the Interior Hortguevalls) and ? 120 each for costs. The Court of
Cassation has extended this long list: ? 2,000 payable together.
For quoting Vichy it comes to a total of ? 9,260. Each letter of this famous spa town so
worth ? 1,852. It is expensive prose! It is not sure that Mr. Jordan has had the
opportunity to become a gentleman in the room rate. The support committee 4 Tours can
immediately pay the additional ? 2,000. We must therefore again appeal to solidarity.
On 21 June 2013, the prefect of Indre-et-Loire the question arose whether it would have
been Jean Moulin Papon or when the Vichy regime was rampant. Leave this question haunt his
mind and see what he actually ordered these last days:
a father is separated from his children and locked up in a detention camp;
a family of eight people is called to a police station to try to expel him.
There are a few months, the same prefect sent cops in college where there was the
commemoration of Jean Moulin June 21, 2013. One day he sends cops and another he raises
existential questions. How strange. Officials would they blockages about historical
comparisons?
Papon and Jean Moulin? We leave you the answer, sometimes it official solicit his Minister
for complaint.
Following the assassination of Clement Meric, many are realizing that right-wing
organizations are dangerous physically, politically and ideologically. The government
looks to ban them. This will not prevent their ideas continue to spread. This is, among
other things, the daily fight against racism and xenophobia state we can expect on store
shelves museums the memory of those obnoxious structures.
We can not ignore the history. We will have to confront a fundamental question. How is it
that the passage of the Third Republic, the Vichy regime is a smooth one in the
administration, the police, the gendarmerie and justice? The xenophobic, racist 30s did
she not helped facilitate such passage?
We accept no conviction. We will go to the European Court of Human Rights. We'll ask him,
among other substantive issues that we have never ceased to raise in court.
Tours on 24/06/2013
Jean-Christophe Berrier and Muriel El Kolli the collective THIRST FOR UTOPIES
soifdutopies@yahoo.fr
Home »
» (en) Organisation Communiste Libertarie (OCL) - When justice is bent on defending the social order (fr)