| The NWS Central Region states and offices participating |
This experiment was developed after an assessment of the May 2011 tornado that devastated Joplin, Missouri killing 158 people. There were three key findings from this assessment:
- The majority of people identified local outdoor warning systems as their first source of warning.
- The majority of people sought confirmation from additional sources before seeking shelter.
- Credible, extraordinary risk signals prompt people to take protective actions.
The IBW tags allow the forecasters to distinguish between a low-impact event (for example a weak, short-lived tornado) and a high impact event (a large, long-lived tornado) Large, damaging tornadoes are relatively infrequent, so most of us will never hear a warning for a tornado causing considerable or significant damage.
In 2012 NWS offices in Kansas and Missouri utilized the impact based warnings. Below is a warning issued last year using the enhanced wording. The changes from a "standard" warning are highlighted in red.
| Tornado warning issued on April 14, 2012 for central Kansas. |
At the conclusion of this storm season the IBW experiment will be independently evaluated to determine its effectiveness.
Will changes in wording actually make a difference? This is an experiment to find out. Public response to warnings is a complicated issue and something that the NWS and emergency officials have wrestled with for years. How the information is communicated (sirens, the broadcast media, the Internet) and the content of the message that is being communicated are two sides of the same coin.
You can read more about the Impact Based Warnings experimental product at this NWS Central Region page.
More background on what was learned from the 2011 Joplin tornado can be found at NWS Central Region Service Assessment Joplin, Missouri, Tornado–May 22, 2011





