(en) France, Alternative Libertair AL 11th Congress - Accommodation: Refuse speculation! (fr)


Housing is a major concern of residents and inhabitants of the neighborhoods. The 
struggles of the housing, even if they know the ups and downs, remain at a fairly higher 
than many other fronts of struggle. Moreover, the economic crisis generated and maintained 
by capitalism will, in all likelihood, increase housing difficulties and therefore the 
intensity of the struggle on this front. ---- Housing, a fundamental good in danger ---- 
The park office is insufficient today, 1.2 million households waiting for social housing 
in France. Housing available at a reasonable price are often far from workplaces, poorly 
served by public transport and lack of public or collective services. The owners allow 
themselves increasingly delusional requirements for documents to provide, guarantees and 
rent on the pretext of being victims of bad payers.

The state leaves do to protect speculators, friends of power. Thousands of square meters 
remain unoccupied to keep prices artificially high. Worse, it violates its own laws. Thus, 
the Opposable Right to Housing (DALO) is still not implemented: once recognized priority 
beneficiaries waiting for housing for very long. The authorities refuse to requisition 
empty slots.

Speculators are building fortunes on the backs of poor housing and tenants forced to 
devote an ever higher their income on housing (11% in 1960 to 27% in 2010, according to 
INSEE). 20% of households spend more modest housing a portion of their income twice as 
high as the 20% richest. Even homeowners who purchase a principal residence for living and 
not for speculation are squeezed by financial institutions that require interest rates too 
high.

Too often, social housing is built on minimum technical standards, source of excessive 
consumption in terms of energy and fluids. This has a significant impact on the budgets of 
occupants and occupants, but also in environmental terms.

Libertarian alternative claims ...
The accommodation must be recognized as a fundamental right and the means must be 
implemented so that this right is respected.

On the front of the housing as the other social fronts, Alternative libertarian 
articulates a share of immediate and urgent claims and secondly a social project 
articulating long-term claims.

The urgency is: Blocking rents: rents blocking can quickly undermine the speculation on 
housing and takes the rate of profit that the owners hope to get. requisitioning of empty 
homes and public control of land (including expropriation): it is at the same time to meet 
a specific need immediate classes, and to take ownership speculative. The struggles of the 
housing allow concrete object property use and property speculation. A punitive tax on 
unoccupied square meters, whether commercial or housing, and unused land. In fact, many 
homeowners prefer to pay the tax on empty homes rather than lower rents in order to 
maintain the speculation. Actual implementation of the SRU law (Law on solidarity and 
urban renewal), which defines the rate housing in the cities, accompanied by a very 
significant increase penalties for municipalities that do not apply. This claim can 
increase the supply of housing. It also allows management to move towards a public housing 
premise in a social service housing. Municipal executives, especially mayors, who do not 
meet the level of social housing should be revoked and rendered ineligible. implementation 
of a policy for new buildings but also the renovation of environmental standards concerned 
minimize environmental impacts and energy as well as reduce the economic cost of occupancy.

But the real solution to the housing crisis is the socialization of housing, that is to 
say, the implementation of Communism, self-management and direct democracy within the 
housing and therefore: Putting implementation of socialized housing service, funded by 
rents, the owners (depending on the floor area per person) and businesses (depending on 
the surface area), and the expropriation of speculators in favor of socialized housing 
service. This claim is clearly not in the context of project libertarian communist 
society, since it is assumed that private owners. Nevertheless, it is a concrete step and 
identifiable before the introduction of a generalized social housing, managing all 
resources and housing need. This service will also support socialized land management for 
the benefit of the community, instead of private interests. Allow access to housing for 
everyone is only a first step. Today, Libertarian Alternative is part of a dynamic 
collective struggle for the establishment of socialized public services allowing you all 
access to basic needs such as energy, heat, water ... This access Universal include the 
provision of a free share of these services unit corresponding to that group of people 
define as "normal", given the capacity to provide social and ecological balance. 's 
limitation rents to 20% maximum income. The notion of "wealth produced" can easily replace 
that income. It must be said that housing is a public good, it has a cost in terms of 
wealth produced. Housing can not be free: construction, maintenance, improvement require a 
portion of the wealth produced collectively. But housing is also a key asset, which should 
be accessible to everyone and evenly distributed. The prohibition to buy a home if it is 
to live. ownership and use need to be contrasted property and lucrative speculation. Have 
housing and be able to adapt to the taste and needs nothing scandalous: it is the property 
use. But derive income housing, or have multiple homes in order to speculate, it's 
capitalism. We refuse and fight any commodification of housing.

Reinvest the front of the housing
The most accurate claims have no chance of success without fighting organization for wear, 
popularize and implement effectively. Many organizations operate on the front of the 
housing, and are mainly three types of steps: The charity (or charities from the world), 
whose objective is to address the urgent "humanitarian" without addressing a priori causes 
of bad housing (capitalism, speculation ...) Squats, which do not fit in a logic of 
obtaining new collective rights organizations struggle and social transformation on the 
front of the housing, which demanding new rights for all and all for housing, and often 
use the squat to correct deficiencies emergency shelter and housing, and denounce the 
capitalist mess multiplication of empty buildings. These can enroll in time and provide a 
fulcrum for major struggles. For example, the CREA and the campaign "Zero street children" 
in Toulouse. They are often the target of repression.

In the latter category, an organization stands: Right to Housing (DAL). In fact, it has a 
wide geographical location, with groups all over France. It has a recognition of both 
media and public. It promotes self-organization of ill-housed, and are homeless. It 
implements direct actions requisition. But it does not only defends a conception of the 
struggle of charitable housing (that is to say focused exclusively on the immediate 
resettlement of ill-housed es), it articulates with a claim to new rights for all and all 
(but not be limited to institutional actions, unlike other organizations).

Right to housing occupies a special place in the landscape of social housing struggles. 
Obviously, there may be places where this organization is less interesting than it is 
nationally. However, it remains a place of organization on the issue.

Libertarian alternative must not neglect its own expression and its intervention as a 
political organization, the front housing.

But, as on other fronts of struggle, activists working Libertarian Alternative development 
of mass organizations, pluralistic (not extensions, screens or transmission belts 
particular organization). To do this, organizations of social transformation should be 
preferred as strategic line of action on this front of struggle.

Posted January 30, 2013 by commission congress