Citation of: Effect of aquatic pollution by the detergent Bio-S on euglenas ~ CookingFood.Org

Citation of: Effect of Water Pollution by Bio-S Cleanser on Euglena, Gidrobiol. Zhurn., 1990, vol. 26, no.6, pp. 78-79 . Authors:Vasternak, K. and Ostroumov, S.A.,

**
The paper that was cited:

Vasternak, K. and Ostroumov, S.A., Effect of Water Pollution by Bio-S Cleanser on Euglena, Gidrobiol. Zhurn., 1990, vol. 26, no.6, pp. 78-79
This paper was cited in the article:

DUNALIELLA SALINA (CHLOROPHYTA) AS A TEST-OBJECT FOR ASSESSMENT OF DETERGENT POLLUTION OF A MARINE ENVIRONMENT
Markina Zh.V., Aizdaicher N.A.
Russian Journal of Marine Biology. 2005. Т. 31. № 4. С. 232-237.

**
More about the paper that was cited:
The original paper was in Russian:

Воздействие загрязнения водной среды СМС Био-С на эвглену // Гидробиологический журнал. 1990. Т. 26. № 6. С.78-79. Табл. Резюме на англ. яз. Библиогр. 9 назв. [Совместно: Вастернак К., С.А.Oстроумов]. [Синтетическое моющее средство Био-С 0.5 г/л полностью подавляло рост Euglena gracilis; в концентрациях 0.01 и 0.1 г/л существенного эффекта не отмечено].

Effects of water pollution by detergent Bio-S on euglens. – Hydrobiological Journal. 1990. Vol. 26. No.6, p. 78-79. Table. The text in Russian; Abstract in English. Bibliogr. 9 refs. [In collaboration: Wasternack C., S.A.Ostroumov.] [Detergent Bio-S 0.5 g/L completely inhibited the growth of Euglena gracilis; at concentrations of 0.01 and 0.1 g/L, no ~~substancial~~ substantial effect]. Translated into English:

Перевод на англ. яз.:

Translated and published in English:

Vasternak K., Ostroumov S.A. Effect of aquatic pollution by the detergent Bio-S on euglenas. - Hydrobiological Journal/Gidrobiologicheskiy Zhurnal [HYDROBIOL. J.]. 1991. Vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 92-94. http://md1.csa.com/partners/viewrecord.php?requester=gs&collection=ENV&recid=2844795&q=Ostroumov+S.A.&uid=788880522&setcookie=yes.

The effect of the detergent Bio-S at concentrations of 0.01-0.5 g/liter on Euglena gracilis was investigated. Concentrations of 0.01 and 0.1 g/liter produced no significant effect, but at 0.5 g/liter the surfactant completely inhibited growth of the culture.