Mar 24, 2011 One reason for Obama's decision on Libya: RwandaBy David Jackson, USA TODAY One apparent reason President Obama decided to take action in Libya: A lack of action 17 years ago in Rwanda. Some members of Obama's national security team also worked for President Bill Clinton, who has said his biggest regret was not intervening in 1994 when the Rwandan government killed hundreds of thousands of people. Clinton said his wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton -- then first lady, now secretary of State -- advocated intervention in Rwanda. He is a prominent supporter of the Libya action. Susan Rice, Obama's United Nations ambassador and a National Security Council staff member during the Clinton years has expressed regret for Rwanda. According to Time magazine, Rice told Harvard scholar Samantha Power, "I swore to myself that if I ever faced such a crisis again, I would come down on the side of dramatic action, going down in flames if that was required." By Monika Graff, Getty Images In the days since the United States and allies began setting up a no-fly zone over Libya with a series of airstrikes, Obama and aides have repeatedly invoked the specter of genocide in deciding to act against dictator Moammar Gadhafi. Speaking in El Salvador on Tuesday, Obama said there is an American interest in stepping in "where a brutal dictator is threatening his people and saying he will show no mercy and go door-to-door hunting people down." By Carolyn Kaster, AP Today, the White House promoted an op-ed column by an interested spectator: Rwandan President Paul Kagame, who titled his piece, "Rwandans know why Gadhafi must be stopped." "My country is still haunted by memories of the international community looking away," Kagame wrote. "No country knows better than my own the costs of the international community failing to intervene to prevent a state killing its own people." |
__._,_.___
__,_._,___





