Another distressing side-effect of Bohrian QT:
—quantum systems are unanalysable
—therefore what is analysable is not quantum
—therefore reality is empirical
—determination is positivist
Bohr's position is basically positivism, in which only empirically measurable ontic things are analysable.
So again, if you base an ontology on this view of quantum theory, you are basing your ontology on an unanalysable system. You are consigning humanities to the garbage bin. Or you can embrace positivism, but you have to sacrifice your “quantum ontology.”
Bohm and Hiley begin their counter-argument like this. Chaotic systems are determinate but not in the strictly linear way that positivism prefers. Chaotic systems are classical. Reality can't be positivist...
We want to be able to say things about reality, not simply admire its intra-active processual unanalysability.
Home »
» Treating Objects like Women 4: Anti-Positivism





