Geller sent YouTube a takedown notice under the DMCS, stating:
"I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed; I have a good faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law; and this notification is accurate".However, the EFF claims that Geller only owns the copyright in 3 seconds of the 13 minute YouTube video, and that this is precisely the sort of thing that would be covered by the fair use defence.
The IPKat reckons that the use of takedown notices in such circumstances is predicated on the belief that their subjects will ‘go quietly’ and will take down the clips with minimal fuss and publicity. He commends the EFF for ensuring that this isn’t the case here. Merpel adds, if Geller’s a psychic, why didn’t he see this lawsuit coming?
EFF’s full complaint is available here.