IN DUBIOUS BATTLEBush’s Social Security “gamble” -- well, only to the extent he is willing to gamble OTHER people’s moneyhttp://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/30/politics/30plan.html“Progressive indexing” isn’t what it appears to behttp://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2005_04_24.php#005567[L]et's state specifically what this to-some-sexy-sounding proposal offers: steep benefit cuts for all